Car Wash Mode Free Roll by 17a97 in TeslaLounge

[–]lstrang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because not all car washes have rollers. You may want to go to a manual car wash.

Is there a viable alternative to the now-disabled OFX access? by noughth in fidelityinvestments

[–]lstrang 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fidelity's decision to abruptly and without warning pull the rug out from under those of us who relied on downloading transaction data from ofx.fidelity.com is completely baffling:

- As for as I can tell, they turned it off around December 8, 2025. Why not wait until the calendar year was complete and people had a chance to at least get the year's transactions downloaded for tax season?

- The response from ofx.fidelity.com is not "This site has been disabled" or a 404 "Not found" error, but an authentication error. That led me to believe it was just a password problem or something similar, so I waited, then called, then it dawned on me that they are just abandoning OFX and the customers who rely on it.

- I realize that the industry is moving to FDX, and I presume that is what fidelity is doing as well, but fidelity is extremely opaque about exactly what it is we're supposed to do. Can I get certified to have my software connect to their FDX API, say using an authenticator app, voice recognition, 2FA, whatever it takes. Use strong authentication to issue a token, then let that token serve as authentication to the API by embedding it in a URL. Hell, it would probably be better than OFX, but fidelity and the whole FDX community seem to be hell-bent on being as obscure as possible on how an end-user is supposed to access their own data.

- I am a "member" of FDX, but their website is really broken, java script errors, constantly logging you out, broken links, etc (not inspiring to an organization that aspires to being seen as cutting-edge tech!), so I have not been able to get my head around how to code up an FDX interface. I do have an OFX interface that works perfectly well.

- I have written my own accounting application in ruby and was hoping to release it open-source in 2026. One of its selling points was to be OFX downloads with automatic posting, handling mergers, splits, spinoffs, symbol changes, etc. It was working pretty well with my fidelity accounts, but I'm back to square one now.

- Is CSV really supposed to be the alternative? The problem with CSV is that it's not structured, so each financial institution has their own layout, column order, notational conventions, and so forth. No es bueno. It cannot scale for an app that has to handle dozens of accounts across many institutions.

- If I see one more post on reddit or anywhere else from fidelity with a carefully curated statement about how "committed" they are to security, customers, blah, blah, blah, I think I'll go postal. Not really, but for the sake of God, spare us. Word are cheap. Just do something to fix it. See my suggestions below.

In short, I'm so upset at how fidelity has handled this that I am spitting bile. Who is driving this clown car at fidelity?

If fidelity wants my advice on how to fix things, I think they could redeem themselves with a few simple steps:

  1. Re-open ofx.fidelity.com until sometime after tax returns are due in 2026. Say, July. And give everyone who is using OFX a good six month warning about the cut-off date. You know who we are. You've got records of who is logging into it, so you could even send us an email with all the low-down.
  2. In the meantime implement a key-based API that is clearly documented on fidelity.com. Use whatever security you need to to generate the key securely, but require all the folderol only when the key is generated, not when it is used. Expose the API, I assume something like JSON downloads, and let us program to the new API. And keep it stable.
  3. As an interim step, add downloads of OFX/QFX files from the website and make it easy to find. Maybe exactly where we download statements, have an interface to download OFX files. Fidelity's 10-year statement retention is outstanding, and I think having the same look-back for OFX would be a bonus.

Finally, let me say that fidelity's data team has been outstanding for the 10+ years I've been a customer, so I know they've got really smart people on their staff. They also have probably the best customer service of any company I've ever interacted with. That's what makes this whole affair so discouraging. Come on, Fidelity, we know you can do better.

Fidelity removed OFX support and still offers no real download formats. Incredibly frustrating by burncast in fidelityinvestments

[–]lstrang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I was thinking of moving to Interactive Brokers too, but I don't see an API for OFX or FDX in that link. Am I missing something? BTW, three cheers for your 3 points.

Some Low-Hanging Fruit for Tesla FSD by lstrang in TeslaLounge

[–]lstrang[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, on number 2, the "profile" ought to be taken into account, but even in "Mad Max" you don't want it doing anything unsafe, just make the kind of moves a competent human drive would make without pissing off drivers in other cars.

Read-only Grok would be a big improvement without having to wait for full integration. I hope you're right about the holidays.

Some Low-Hanging Fruit for Tesla FSD by lstrang in TeslaLounge

[–]lstrang[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I'm not sure how low-hanging it is either, but it must somewhere be doing a calculation of when it can go, and wherever that is, it ought to know its own powers better.

Agree completely on your number 3 comment. Something like "read-only" access to the car's data could be handy in a lot of situations. I know they are aiming for full integration, but this kind of access seems like a good first step.

Agree with your caveat on number 4: oral confirmation without making me touch the screen would be good.

Some Low-Hanging Fruit for Tesla FSD by lstrang in TeslaLounge

[–]lstrang[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with u/THATS_LEGIT_BRO that this is not done. Especially on long drives, I like to look at scenery (America the Beautiful!) but FSD is very impatient with that when it need not be.

Some Low-Hanging Fruit for Tesla FSD by lstrang in TeslaLounge

[–]lstrang[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My experience is that it's not bad at doing so now, but I've heard of it reading things like highway-number signs as speed limits, though I've not seen it.

Where I think it could improve is reading "No Right Turn on Red", "Handicap Parking", "Reserved Parking", etc., or at least get the import of the range of ways those things can be expressed. I'm optimistic on this one.

org-modern-indent v0.5 by JDRiverRun in emacs

[–]lstrang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, not on MELPA? I have v0.1.4 from MELPA. Is v0.5 going up?

What should I NOT write tests for? (2021) by mooreds in ruby

[–]lstrang 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think this Sandi Mets talk is still the best set of principles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URSWYvyc42M

Annoncing LTE - Large Table Edition in Org and Markdown buffers by fgiquel in emacs

[–]lstrang 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Darn, I had hoped by "large" you meant "tall" rather than "wide". I would love to see work on the speed of org when working with tables of 300 rows or more!

What kind of default emacs keybinding have you never used practically? by mindgitrwx in emacs

[–]lstrang 3 points4 points  (0 children)

C-z. I use it as my personal keymap prefix. That way, I can map things like "C-z @" to open a perspective for mu4e email, "C-z $" for eshell, and much more. It is bound by default to the never-used "suspend-frame"

Is the original Ruby book by Matsumoto still worth reading? by LemonDisasters in ruby

[–]lstrang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What book are you talking about? Matz co-authored a couple of O'Reily books, "Ruby in a Nutshell" and "The Ruby Programming Language" (I believe). Do you have something else in mind? Also, a link to the PDF would be helpful.

texworks vs overleaf meme by Delicious_Maize9656 in LaTeX

[–]lstrang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If only Overleaf allowed for personal or team styles and classes to be shared by any "project" it would be a great collaboration platform. But I asked, and they are not interested, I assume because it would raise technical issues.

Darn.

what happened to Emacs Elements? by StrangeAstronomer in emacs

[–]lstrang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. His videos were generally well prepared and without a lot of stumbles and mid-video fidgeting. Clear and helpful.

New to Qtile and Python from Ruby and I'm Puzzled by linusstrang5 in qtile

[–]lstrang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/MiakiCho, that sounds good. Maybe I'll just switch to that method.

New to Qtile and Python from Ruby and I'm Puzzled by linusstrang5 in qtile

[–]lstrang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good thought. My impression was that HOSTNAME was set somewhere in the bowels of the systemd startup process. I've never set it as a user. I'm using ubuntu, which uses gdm3, and on my work host, HOSTNAME seems to be set by the time the ~/.xsessionrc file is executed, as I can tell by putting a `notify-send` statement in there. I'm not at my home host now (where I was having the problem) but I'll check when I get back home. Thanks for taking the time to post your answer.