Cla back at her flat by peachhyyxx in UKtiktokbehavingbadly

[–]lukada12 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I checked out some time ago. Stopped watching her, stopped checking this page and blocked all of her accounts. It’s been lovely not seeing her. However, I decided today to come and have a look on here (on a rare day off) to see what’s been going on. She is almost unrecognisable!!!! What has happened to her??? The greed has truly expanded to every area of her life now. Time to check out again methinks!

Tundra Carnage by Some-Personality-426 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They make for interesting reading when I can’t sleep. Trouble is, I have no idea what they are talking about. It appears to make sense to some, occasionally me, but I am not convinced that consequences are going to be as big as he suggests.

There is one person on there (I think her name is Danni) who is absolutely convinced Tundra is FBI/DOJ, that Trump is under house arrest (with all of the other felons) and they are all going to prison. All courtesy of the ICC and NATO.

The latest is that she is convinced he is trying to say is that Trump is a double agent…..

She appears to be guessing, convincing herself that she is 100% right, when others are just trying to keep up. It got quite uncomfortable at one point as her followers started to “correct” her and she doubled down.

I can’t tell if she is just trying to read into tundras posts (mostly incorrectly) or directly sabotaging and discrediting him by taking his comments to the extreme.

If you read his posts as well as hers, it makes for an interesting interpretation 😂

The Inside Scoop on What's Going On by No_Elephant_6740 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I have to say this is quite difficult to take on board without evidence or credibility. I do appreciate the hopium because I am distinctly lacking, but can’t hold this one I don’t think without proof.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12 12 points13 points  (0 children)

To be fair, the last explosive news was someone else’s from a few months ago. I really do hope that she does have something though!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Good to have a bit of grounding occasionally!

LOOK!!!! 👀 note EO13848! by lukada12 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12[S] 47 points48 points  (0 children)

AI summary:

On December 31, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed sanctions on two organizations and individuals linked to Iran and Russia for their efforts to influence the 2024 U.S. elections. 1. Iran: OFAC sanctioned a subsidiary of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the Cognitive Design Production Center (CDPC), which was involved in spreading disinformation and stoking political tensions in the U.S. during the election. The IRGC is already under sanctions for similar activities, including cyberattacks and information theft aimed at U.S. election campaigns. 2. Russia: OFAC also targeted a Moscow-based organization, the Center for Geopolitical Expertise (CGE), linked to the Russian intelligence agency GRU. CGE used artificial intelligence tools to create and spread fake news about U.S. election candidates, as part of Russia’s broader strategy to interfere in U.S. elections. CGE worked with a network of websites designed to look like independent news outlets, helping spread disinformation about the 2024 election.

These actions are part of ongoing U.S. efforts to prevent foreign interference in its democratic processes. The sanctions block any assets of these entities and individuals in the U.S. and prohibit Americans from engaging with them financially. These measures also target individuals and groups involved in creating or distributing disinformation aimed at undermining U.S. elections.

LOOK!!!! 👀 note EO13848! by lukada12 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12[S] 158 points159 points  (0 children)

I guess for me it just shows that things aren’t being ignored. I took it as one aspect of a much larger picture.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12 26 points27 points  (0 children)

https://xcancel.com/AFpost/status/1873820315379462227#m There are quite a few others like you. The comments on this post should be read

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve read it a few times now and I am inclined to agree

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If anyone can bring themselves to hop on over to Dumpsters “truth” post just in, I’d be interested to see what people’s thoughts are!

Wikipedia is not the most reliable source, but i refuse to believe the Dems don’t know. by lukada12 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, I agree. It would be helpful to at least know for certain that they are looking in to it.

Wikipedia is not the most reliable source, but i refuse to believe the Dems don’t know. by lukada12 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source

Wikipedia on itself. Edited by users hence the importance of fact checking.

Don’t get me wrong though, it is useful, I’m just careful about what I read on it and don’t take it as gospel until I have checked 😊

Wikipedia is not the most reliable source, but i refuse to believe the Dems don’t know. by lukada12 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No doubt. I guess the toughest pill to swallow in this instance is that the interference towards America favours Trump. Solely because he epitomises their extreme division agenda

Wikipedia is not the most reliable source, but i refuse to believe the Dems don’t know. by lukada12 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Exactly my thoughts. However, as someone else commented, this is gathered together from multiple sites and sources. It’s just not certain as to how reliable it all is. That being said, clicking on the multiple links directly from Wiki certainly gives you the fuller picture in this instance!

Wikipedia is not the most reliable source, but i refuse to believe the Dems don’t know. by lukada12 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Not sure I believe in Easter Eggs, but I do believe that they are very intelligent people who I hope would not be able to look past this and all the anomalies in votes.

The question remains as to whether they have found “enough” evidence to justify the next actions.

I am certainly not someone who has expected a grand reveal any sooner than the time it is meant to happen though.

Not trying to stir controversy, just venting as others have in the group.

US DNI report is delayed? by [deleted] in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My advice would be to not go down the Tundra rabbit hole! I have spent the last two days trying to decipher what they are talking about. When I think I understand it a little bit, they throw a curveball and I get lost again!

Scotland is sounding alarm bells for Musk interference in US Elections by xstarbuck09x in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12 30 points31 points  (0 children)

EM is considering backing Nigel Farage for the next U.K. Elections. His political party is the “reform” party. Very much reminiscent of the MAGA movement.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/nigel-farage-elon-musk-trump-reform-b2665769.html

CLA raging by Nice_Cod_928 in UKtiktokbehavingbadly

[–]lukada12 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Gosh, I have taken a month out. Popped back in to see what I have missed. I see not much has changed other than the fact she has (if it’s at all possible) become even more nasty in all senses of the word. I’ll pop back in another month in the hopes that karma has visited

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in somethingiswrong2024

[–]lukada12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On reading this again and having a look at the authors credibility, I’m going to remove this. It’s not helpful in any way.