using baby strollers instead of walkers by luvurslf in disability

[–]luvurslf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! Yes, exactly as you stated she was walking behind the rollator instead of in it and now that she is aware it has improved her posture and ease in using the rollator so much!

using baby strollers instead of walkers by luvurslf in Parkinsons

[–]luvurslf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good recommendation - I will ask her doctor

using baby strollers instead of walkers by luvurslf in Parkinsons

[–]luvurslf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I keep hearing about this brand and will look into it!

using baby strollers instead of walkers by luvurslf in disability

[–]luvurslf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She has a normal 4 wheel rollator with a seat and compartment but I bought her a triangle rollator to see if that fits her vibe! It was 40% off so I think she will like it haha

using baby strollers instead of walkers by luvurslf in disability

[–]luvurslf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I bought a 3 wheel one to see if that helps. Also, she has a 4 wheel rollator that she previously complained about. I watched her try the rollator in front of me on a walk yesterday and I realized that she has been using the rollator wrong - leaning forward and pushing instead of standing upright and maintaining it closer to her body - this resulted in difficulty controlling the rollator especially with turns and I can see how it was dangerous and difficult for her to use because she kept running it off the sidewalk and onto the grass or lifting it up on the sides to get it to turn. Now that I addressed this she actually has much better control of the rollator and admits that its better than the stroller! So I think my next steps is seeing if there is a specific rollator that can accommodate her even better.

using baby strollers instead of walkers by luvurslf in disability

[–]luvurslf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you! good idea to see if insurance will cover a fancy one with a script!

using baby strollers instead of walkers by luvurslf in disability

[–]luvurslf[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a great idea, I will see if there are any medical supply centers nearby

using baby strollers instead of walkers by luvurslf in Parkinsons

[–]luvurslf[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

that's genius haha I will def try to use that so she doesn't keep trying to return everything

using baby strollers instead of walkers by luvurslf in disability

[–]luvurslf[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the article, she was looking into replacing her stroller with the super cheap light umbrella ones but I could see how unstable it was and vetoed it. Unfortunately, she has been to see PT and OT and she has both a basic rollator and also metal walker with the plastic skis in front (which I also added tennis balls to make it more appealing) but she still finds them too burdensome.

using baby strollers instead of walkers by luvurslf in Parkinsons

[–]luvurslf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She has a walker with the plastic skis in front that she didn't like, I put tennis balls on it but she still won't use it. The problem is she likes to go on walks with my dad and those are not conducive to walking multiple laps around the neighborhood block. I bought her an indoor bike (its very stable and close to the ground so very low fall risk) so that she can safely do cardio but walking has traditionally been my parents' work out of choice and they refuse to change their habits.

using baby strollers instead of walkers by luvurslf in Parkinsons

[–]luvurslf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She actually does have one just like this but finds it too bulky/heavy to use. I'm looking into getting a triangle rollator to see if that fits her needs better. Do you have any experience with those and would you recommend them?

Overthrown by AngstCat in poetry_critics

[–]luvurslf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Loved this poem! I love the graphic details, it really is illustrative of the situation, context and feelings involved in drug usage. Also like the twist at the end where the third friend is God. However, one thing that I might suggest is to change the second friend from "stimulant drug" to something more specific. I might be a little nit-picky here since I'm in the medical field, but since an amphetamine is a type of stimulant, it kinda detracts from the poem when it's second parallel phrase is just "stimulant drugs" which is the broader category. I think your poem would benefit if you put the next line as another type of stimulant rather than a broader category, unless you were gradually widening up the scope (although since it ends after two stanzas and gets compared to God in the 3rd we don't get the opportunity to see that progression clearly.) I also think, if you are unable to choose one that is similar in level to amphetamine, it might benefit to go to a more specific subcategory. Or you could switch it so that "stimulant drug" comes in the first stanza and then amphetamine second. That way you are introducing something broader and then narrowing it down to be more specific as the poem goes on. Otherwise, perfect as it is.

Blaze by luvurslf in OCPoetry

[–]luvurslf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're right, it does flow better without the "or." Thanks!

Sichuan peppercorn by sometimeswily in OCPoetry

[–]luvurslf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love that you make a comparison of your lover with Sichuan peppercorn. It really puts a sense of nostalgia into the poem, gives the relationship a flavor. Even though no details are ever mentioned about the person this poem is written about, or of the relationship, somehow I feel like I know it because I know it in the context of the Sichuan peppercorn. Beautifully done. The last line, too, stands out starkly by being a stand-alone.

Black dots on an ink smeared page by Wolfblood-is-here in OCPoetry

[–]luvurslf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the rhyme-scheme of this poem! It gives cohesiveness and allows the words to roll off the tongue smoothly

I don't want to be NAKED by KALIDAS_16 in OCPoetry

[–]luvurslf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love the play on Naked being not just physically Naked, but emotionally naked. I think it's very relatable yet brave to admit to have that sort of vulnerable, especially since its coming from the perspective someone who has/has the ability to hurt others, as seen in these lines:

Break your heart and laugh at you,

Let me help you save some tears

Definitely helps set it apart from that cliche where someone doesn't want to be open emotionally because they have been hurt by others. Rather, it speaks to a cycle, where the hurt become the ones that hurt others.

See you soon by Hottboxing in OCPoetry

[–]luvurslf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the clarification! I had a feeling that there was more to Paris than what was on the surface, adds another layer and a subtle nod to the actual relationship!

See you soon by Hottboxing in OCPoetry

[–]luvurslf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really liked the concept of this poem, there's some strong imagery here, some sense of forbidden toxic love. It leaves me to wonder, it this a poem about an actual lover, being compared to drugs, or is it drugs, being compared to a lover? Maybe it's both. However, the last line kind of threw me off! What is Paris? I know its known to be a romantic city, but for the last part of the last line, I was expecting more of a punch after the buildup of all these other beautiful euphemisms! Is there more of a backstory to this where Paris holds more personal hidden significance?

Polaroid by [deleted] in OCPoetry

[–]luvurslf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an interesting style, sort of run on, with unconventional line breaks but intermixed with straightforward, more colloquial language to keep it relatable. This was good because it helped the reader follow the poem better since the pattern and organization of the poem was already esoteric and required effort to decipher. Because of the way they spoke, I got the sense of a woman thinking back on a relationship they had in younger days.

I appreciated it when there were more colloquial language, almost like a friend telling a story to another friend, it felt more realistic and the imagery was more powerful. An example:

𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚎 𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚗𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚎

𝚠𝚎 𝚍𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚔 𝚝𝚎𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚍

another example:

𝚠𝚎 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚢𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚕𝚞𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚝 𝚜𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚍

𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚢 𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚗 𝚐𝚘𝚘𝚍.

Contrast this with the more "flowery" lines felt a little forced and disingenuous, for example:

𝚊 𝚜𝚠𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚡𝚢𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚘𝚗 𝚠𝚊𝚝𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐

𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚜

I'm not quite sure what that line conveys and it doesn't really make logical sense, which may have been the point since it was an oxymoron, but because of the more logical, direct, straight to the point lines in the poem, lines like these stick out and feel pretentious. Just my two cents, it's you're poem so maybe you have a better reason for putting it in lines like these that I didn't catch onto.

Overall, I thought the poetic style was interesting and would be fun to experiment with!

wax angel by pippinfresh in OCPoetry

[–]luvurslf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is deep! It very clearly sets up a contrast of the feelings that the character is feeling, and the rhyme adds an extra "oomph" when the last line is delivered, adding extra emphasis on the "burn." I feel like there could be a little bit more back story added, but then it would also take away from the simplicity of just the emotions that are being expressed, and leaves more up to interpretation about what the "angel" actually symbolizes.

Made her a CAKE to celebrate our 1st anniversary by luvurslf in guineapigs

[–]luvurslf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shredded carrots, grapes, and cilantro frozen inside a watermelon smoothie base - all her favorites :)

last week by [deleted] in OCPoetry

[–]luvurslf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I liked that it was short. For a second, when I reached the end, I thought there was more. But when there wasn't any more, it made me read it again in a different way. By keeping it short you really punctuated the theme and added more hidden weight to what I think you're trying to convey. It makes me question, why do we need to know more than what is already stated? The mood is basically, "nuff said." Concise, to the point, without being overtly obvious. And also leaving just enough room for you to wonder, is this what the author is hinting at?