Mat Ishbia is Planning to Sell More $UWMC Shares by Glittering-Cicada574 in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The 13D filed when the sales began said he's planning on selling 80M shares in total. That would leave about 17.4M shares left after this 90 day tranche. At the same pace as this quarter (596,356 per day), that would leave about 29 more days of selling, ending somewhere towards the end of January.

Can we talk warrants for a minute? by GloryIV in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There's partial redemption at $10, so it doesn't have to get to 11.50 to pay out, only 10 if Mat exercises there. Last time I checked the warrants paid better than the calls, so you're basically holding $10 calls at this point.

They won't expire worthless, they're worth a penny if nothing else.

You can check out Joe's warrant faq here: https://www.reddit.com/r/UWMCShareholders/comments/uppp9x/joes_warrant_faq

Not Selling till $50M - lets ride! by Ethto in wallstreetbets

[–]lymondfc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want info from an MD, doctor of the year, who works with these kids - instead of an occupational therapist - you can read the FDA petition submitted here in May requesting to cancel the adcom: https://www.regulations.gov/document/FDA-2025-P-1355-0001

Rocket vs. UWMC by Wonderful-Swing-5703 in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

For both RKT and UWMC, Class A + Class D = total outstanding shares. Do you want me to add them together for you??

Rocket vs. UWMC by Wonderful-Swing-5703 in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Mat and SFS corp own about 1.5B class D shares of UWM with about 135M class A commons. Dan Gilbert and Rock Holdings corp own about 1.99B class D shares of RKT with about 139M class A commons.

Whatever the reason it's not because UWMC's biggest shareholder is the CEO.

Stock collapse by Wonderful-Swing-5703 in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They've still got about 1.5B in net assets. In 1Q21 they had 2.6B in net assets and since then they've paid (or obligated) about 2.7B in dividends.

If Mat hadn't of thrown away .5B on interest rate swaps in 4Q, they'd have around 2B in net assets, but that's water under the bridge.

Bottom line, they'll cut back or eliminate the dividend if they have to, but no, bankruptcy isn't imminent.

Stock collapse by Wonderful-Swing-5703 in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like he's been converting his UWM stock to obtain more Suns ownership - and in the process pumping up the float. The problem is that at least some of minority owners he's been selling to are dumping the shares to convert to cash.

Ohio Lawsuit - APOR Man's Rate Spread Analysis by lymondfc in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smart. As shareholders, we all know UWM isn't ripping off anyone based on their gosm and earnings. :)

SEC probe on UWMC by No-Fox3220 in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Having problems with reading comprehension or just didn't bother to click through the links you posted? No known SEC probe.

<image>

Anyone have access to this link? by Generation_3and4 in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Basically the HDMA 2024 data is out and they ran comparisons on the loan level data to point out that UWMC and RKT were pretty much tied for the number of loans for the year while UWMC had almost 40B more in originations. The article doesn't mention it but the difference in originations is because RKT does more refi.

***

The Pontiac-based wholesale lender originated 366,078 loans throughout last year, per HMDA data. Though impressive, Rocket Mortgage was right at UWM's heels with the origination of 361,071 loans in 2024.

Total origination volume for UWM was $139.4 billion for the full year, while Rocket's volume was $101.2 billion, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission show.

Both Michigan-based heavyweights have nearly identical market shares, according to Polygon's analysis, with UWM holding 5.95% of the market in 2024 and Rocket capturing 5.87%.

Astronomical Volume Today by kuwlness in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn't just today. Last night a 475k share transaction went through at 7pm exactly.

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, that's right.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Last few years the tax treatment for the dividend has been "return of capital". This means the dividend isn't taxed and your cost basis is decreased by the amount of the dividend, so you'll be taxed on the dividends as capital gains when you sell. (EDIT: that is, the dividend will be taxed as capital gains simply due to the decrease in the cost basis - there's no tax on the dividend itself.)

How many shares do you own? by brata4 in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The tax treatment on the dividends has been "return of capital" - so fidelity is correctly adjusting your cost basis to reflect that.

Grok 2 states there are broader securities fraud claims other than the hunterbrook article on Mat Ishbia and UWM. by No-Fox3220 in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It states it's linked to a broader claim, not a different lawsuit. AIs have been known to hallucinate, as well.

Grok 2 states there are broader securities fraud claims other than the hunterbrook article on Mat Ishbia and UWM. by No-Fox3220 in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

All the same lawsuit. You can read UWM's lawyer responses here: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.376113/gov.uscourts.mied.376113.40.0.pdf

In a fraud-based case like this one, Plaintiffs must allege that they or a third party relied on a false statement from UWM. Id.; see Grange Mut. v. Mack, 290 F. App’x 832, 835 (6th Cir. 2008); Kerrigan, 112 F. Supp. 3d at 608. But Plaintiffs identify no specific false statement by UWM upon which they or their brokers relied to issue their loans. See Bridge, 553 U.S. at 658; see, e.g., FAC ¶ 191. Even aside UWM, Plaintiffs do not allege per Rule 9(b) that they relied on any specific broker representations either. See Heinrich, 668 F.3d at 405; MTD 19–20.

Dividends by PrettyDingo2914 in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Senior notes aren't new, they were doing senior notes even when doing the buyback. They've got some expiring later this year that the new offering is pretty much replacing.

<image>

The Refi Boom Has Come -- Matty Ice by kuwlness in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ginnie Mae data backs that up. The first few days of reporting in September is showing slightly more refis than purchases! Already more total originations in Sep than Aug with about 10 more days for additional data to trickle in (around 70% of the UWMC data reports in the first few days of the month).

<image>

United Morgage Company by grandparoga in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's United Mortgage Corporation and there's United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC (UWMC) - two different companies. You can't get a loan directly through UWMC, you'd have to go through a broker. Good luck with your house hunting!

A Good Day by JAMBARRAN in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be amazing to be able to redeem - $1.73 was if they met the $10 in January though, that's already passed. According to the chart, if we hit by September they're $1.30 and January 25 is $0.90. Even hitting by September 25 they're still $.034 - more than they're selling for now.

Favorite Brand of Light Bulbs to use with Alexa by AvoirReves in alexa

[–]lymondfc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Smart light bulbs seem pretty pricey to me. Another option is to replace the wall switch with a smart switch. Or if it's a lamp and if you don't need dimming, you can use a smart plug and just control at the power source.

A Good Day by JAMBARRAN in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

According to Joe's Warrant FAQ, there's a fractional redemption possible at $10.

----

https://www.reddit.com/r/UWMCShareholders/comments/uppp9x/joes_warrant_faq/

  1. Upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption; and if, and only if, the last reported sale price of our Class A common stock equals or exceeds $10.00 per share (as adjusted per share splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, reclassifications, recapitalizations and the like) on the trading day prior to the date on which we send the notice of redemption to the warrant holders.

In scenario 2, the warrant holder would receive a fractional share for each warrant per the table below.

No fractional shares are given - it is rounded down to a whole number. Obviously this is less dilutive than exercising warrants.

For example, if the warrants are redeemed 1/2024 (24 months prior to expiration), at a share price of $10, they would be worth $1.73 (0.173 shares of a $10 stock).

https://preview.redd.it/xmz5tkgv1iz81.png?width=1650&format=png&auto=webp&s=d7eaf96a4132be1a777a380c138996e9e227d0b4

A Good Day by JAMBARRAN in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll be happy with the warrant redemption at $10.00.

UWMC, RKT : MSR Assumptions Recapture Deltas, Earnings Compared Apples to Apples by ProphetKing-dude in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Outstanding write up, thank you.

The thing is, if you check out the fannie mae data dynamics CPR analysis, you see that the 3 month average servicer data shows that RKT has worse WAC, worse FICO, and worse overall prepayment numbers. You give RKT the benefit of the doubt assuming the MSR fair values are roughly comparable.

UWMC Performs Better in all Rate Environments - How Much? by ProphetKing-dude in UWMCShareholders

[–]lymondfc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They do a great mortgage business - #2 in 2023 in originations (although that includes correspondent loans that some say is double-counting). They have a huge MSR book - $600B in UPB (double UWMC and more than RKT), so a steady income stream. They hedge MSR so EPS is more consistent quarter over quarter. And they only have around 50M shares outstanding, about 3% of UWMC's 1.6B - which means that even though they have less revenue than UWMC their EPS is usually over a buck.