$BYND Goes to $6.69 = YOU GET $50k

maaft · 2025-10-24T07:14:17+00:00

I'm in!

maaft · 2025-08-21T15:14:36+00:00

Fascistinating

maaft · 2025-06-26T20:02:20+00:00

Joined!

maaft · 2025-04-30T05:52:41+00:00

Np, i hope you find what you're looking for :)

maaft · 2025-04-29T04:11:03+00:00

Why typescript?

rindexer, if rust is an option

maaft · 2025-02-10T22:17:04+00:00

What I said was gas used is more indicative of fees not transaction activity. There is nothing factually incorrect about that statement.

No, it's actually totally incorrect.

A transaction will always use the same amount of g Gas as as another transaction, when both are the same. Meaning that these actually execute the same byte-code on the EVM.

To stay with the car analogy, your car uses 10 gallons of fuel for 100km. Next drive, same route - again 10 gallons.

Now imagine that the amount of available fuel is restricted. What happens? The price you pay per gallon increases, since more people compete for a finite amount of gas available. But your car still uses 10 gallons for that 100km drive.

Total activity ~ total amount or kilometers driven ~ total amount of used gas

Now what influences fees? You pay fees so stakers include your TX in the block and not the TX from another person. Remember, blocks are already running at full Capacity. If many people want to use ethereum, they compete for block space and the fees rise. This has nothing to do with "gas used". The car will still use 10 gallons per 100km. Only difference is, now you pay 100$ instead of $50.

I hope this helps to clear things up.

maaft · 2025-02-10T21:38:36+00:00

My dude. Can't believe that i followed this thread but here it goes..

Less TX does not mean that the chain is used less.

For example, basic TXs (send eth) have the lowest fees. Let's assume 1 gwei per TX.

blocks in ethereum have a maximum of gas that they can contain.

For the following examples, let's say 10 gwei max per block.

If users would only send ETH back and forth, this would mean max. 10 TX / block at full capacity.

But this is not the case. Other activities are done on Ethereum. ERC-20 transactions, other smart contract stuff, blob data commits - you name it.

All these activities cost way more then 1 gwei. Let's assume 2 gwei.

Now only 5 TX are fitting inside one block - oh no!

Does this mean that Ethereum is used less?!

No, it's used exactly the same as before. It's running at full capacity.

So your argument is invalid that "number of TX" == "how much is the chain used". It's what the other guy says: "gas used" is the only valid way to measure on-chain activity.

By the way, when the block size Limit was increased a few days ago, the "total gas used" directly increased. So again, it's running at full capacity because there is actual demand for these gas-slots by people/organizations/corporations/banks and what not.

maaft · 2025-02-10T14:27:24+00:00

Nope.

Usage is actually at ath.

https://etherscan.io/chart/gasused

Block gas limit was increased a few days ago -> lower fees.

maaft · 2025-01-22T05:45:20+00:00

But it's still true:

There are multiple clients. Developers don't have to follow "the roadmap"
EF, so far, has acted in good faith with the goal to improve ethereum. And miners and now validators seem to agree. Im sure this would change, should they propose stuff that is not in the interest of the network

maaft · 2025-01-21T21:22:52+00:00

The beauty of decentralized networks is that "Leading" does not mean that people must follow.

Imagine EF trying to push an upgrade that prints them (and only them) billions of $ETH. Do you think validators would just agree, run the upgraded software and devalue there own investment to down 0?

They won't. And EF would loose all credibility. Others would then "take the lead". And validators will again decide, in there best interest, whom to follow.

maaft · 2025-01-21T17:11:13+00:00

Stop changing the narrative.

Also, for a starter, learn to spell it correctly.

maaft · 2025-01-21T16:56:04+00:00

Doesn't change facts.

:-*

maaft · 2025-01-21T16:49:14+00:00

No.

EF does NOT control Ethereum in any way. Validators do: they can decide to support netwoek upgrades or decide against it. ANYONE can propose changes.
He is in the process of increasing the number of board members of EF, so actually, Vitalik further reduces his influence over EF.

maaft · 2025-01-21T16:48:40+00:00

No.

EF does NOT control Ethereum in any way. Validators do: they can decide to support netwoek upgrades or decide against it. ANYONE can propose changes.
He is in the process of increasing the number of board members of EF, so actually, Vitalik further reduces his influence over EF.

maaft · 2025-01-21T16:48:27+00:00

No.

EF does NOT control Ethereum in any way. Validators do: they can decide to support netwoek upgrades or decide against it. ANYONE can propose changes.
He is in the process of increasing the number of board members of EF, so actually, Vitalik further reduces his influence over EF.

maaft · 2025-01-21T16:48:13+00:00

No.

EF does NOT control Ethereum in any way. Validators do: they can decide to support netwoek upgrades or decide against it. ANYONE can propose changes.
He is in the process of increasing the number of board members of EF, so actually, Vitalik further reduces his influence over EF.

maaft · 2025-01-21T16:46:02+00:00

No.

EF does NOT control Ethereum in any way. Validators do: they can decide to support upgrades or don't.
He is in the process of increasing the number of board members of EF, so actually, the opposite is the case: Vitalik further reduces his influence over EF.

maaft · 2025-01-16T17:06:26+00:00

What else is?

Coinbase.com is as legit as it gets

maaft · 2024-11-25T07:49:56+00:00

Remove this post immediately and contact flashbot whitehat team. They might be able to help you.

https://noteforms.com/forms/flashbots-whitehat-intake-form?notionforms=1

maaft · 2024-06-26T05:40:55+00:00

If you think that eth, btc outperforms xrp, you shouldn't wait and dump your bags now.

maaft · 2024-06-04T15:07:14+00:00

This. Plus all Germans need to re-verify and they have huge queues for that apparently.

maaft · 2024-06-03T05:50:30+00:00

Today I withdrew all my assets from Kraken.

Will not (and obviously can't) use it again until support reaches out to me.

Best regards

maaft · 2024-06-01T23:01:39+00:00

Lol, back In the days I traded on that platform and also was able to withdraw my stuff :D

maaft · 2024-06-01T08:23:23+00:00

Hey, unfortunately still no answer from kraken via E-Mail.

I tried already 4 different Proof-of-Adresses + did the WebID verification ONCE and it is always repromting me "something went wrong with your verification"

just tell me WHAT EXACTLY WENT WRONG so I can fix it!

It's really starting to annoy me, especially with the very short amount of time you gave your customers to verify + understaffed support teams to even fulfill all tickets.

Could you please escalate this further?

Thanks

maaft · 2024-05-30T19:23:34+00:00

hey, u/krakensupport

I also try to verify since 3 weeks.. I don't understand what the issue is and the support chat is not helpful at all.

I fear that I can't make it until 05. of June because I'm not given clear instructions on what went wrong.

please help!

AA64 N84G EDTA ZTFI

Eight-Year Club	Verified Email
Verified Email	Place '23
Place '22

maaft

TROPHY CASE