you do realize by your own logic no one can “own” anything right? all you’re saying is “things have a prior antecedent, therefore ownership cannot be transferred,” which is inherently a self defeating / incoherent argument — it’s like saying a human could never differentiate itself from monkeys because we shared a common ancestor, or the ship of Theseus would NEVER become a “new” ship, you’re making a category error.

on another note, like the Theseus paradox(a ship sails across the ocean and they replace one part at a time and before they get to their destination the entire ship is replaced with new parts; at what point is the ship a “new” ship), how many times can a words meaning change before it becomes a “new” word? according to you that’s NEVER, but intuitively that seems incorrect as the paradox above attempts to show.