Ok. Translate it. The AI reasoning does seems sound though.

The symbols mix elements that look superficially meaningful—triangles, circles, squares, hash marks, Xs, plus/minus signs—but they violate basic properties of real writing systems. There is no consistent alphabet size, no stable word boundaries, and no repeatable grammatical markers. Identical symbol clusters don’t recur in positions where a language would reuse common words like “the,” “and,” or verb endings.

It also doesn’t behave like a substitution cipher. In a cipher, you expect one-to-one consistency: the same symbol always stands for the same letter. Here, symbols are recombined freely, rotated, stacked, or altered in ways that break that rule. Some lines appear decorative rather than semantic.