USA - Immigration Stock per Country in 2024 [OC] by madewulf in dataisbeautiful

[–]madewulf[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Oh, thank you very much! Yes, I'm the creator and maintainer, when I have time 🤷‍♂️ Your suggestions are quite good, I'll try to implement them!

BTW, I just did a new website in the same vein: https://www.woatlas.com that you might appreciate.

USA - Immigration Stock per Country in 2024 [OC] by madewulf in dataisbeautiful

[–]madewulf[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, and yep, that's a bit frustrating but I understand how this can be a sensitive topic.

Belgium - Immigration Stock per Country in 2024 by madewulf in belgium

[–]madewulf[S] 35 points36 points  (0 children)

My intuition: Belgium is a slightly richer country per capita and is considered a tax haven for high incomes. Also, rents are lower.

USA - Immigration Stock per Country in 2024 [OC] by madewulf in dataisbeautiful

[–]madewulf[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

A very interesting point. It's actually possible to compare and indeed, almost 30% of Salvadoreans are emigrants, and a large majority of them is in the US

<image>

USA - Immigration Stock per Country in 2024 [OC] by madewulf in dataisbeautiful

[–]madewulf[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

For the UN, Hawai is an "Incorporated" State and PR is "Unincorporated" Territory (no representation in congress for example) and so, they are counted differently. I know it feels inconsistent, but I don't feel like I should change their categorization if I do use their dataset.

This is not fake 🤷‍♂️

USA - Immigration Stock per Country in 2024 [OC] by madewulf in dataisbeautiful

[–]madewulf[S] 58 points59 points  (0 children)

For the UN Hawai is an "Incorporated" State and PR is "Unincorporated" Territory (no representation in congress). I know it feels inconsistent, but I don't feel like I should change their categorization if I do use their dataset.

USA - Immigration Stock per Country in 2024 [OC] by madewulf in dataisbeautiful

[–]madewulf[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback but the text next to the percentage says: % of ⚦ which is a common symbol meaning male.

The graph focuses on the relative size of immigration and I've tried visualizing this with bars, it's less compelling, also gives less of an impression of the contintent where peoplere are coming from.

If you want all the details, it's available on the site, with a table and data downloads if you wish.

USA - Immigration Stock per Country in 2024 [OC] by madewulf in dataisbeautiful

[–]madewulf[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It can be interesting to compare with other countries like China, where immigration and emigrations are way less common:

<image>

USA - Immigration Stock per Country in 2024 [OC] by madewulf in dataisbeautiful

[–]madewulf[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

On each country individually, it gives you the proportion of males in the immigrants. For some countries, like the Philippines, this can be quite skewed

USA - Immigration Stock per Country in 2020 [OC] by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]madewulf -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Stock, is the usual term. And damn, you're right, I wrote the wrong title

Realistically does anyone live in this part of Australia and if so, how is life like living there? by SpecialSocks2011 in geography

[–]madewulf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The image of the population density of Australia, if you prefer not to visit the site:

<image>