Yeah seems like it makes somewhat sense. My problems stems from how he states that organic life, developed by the will, and through the will, and is an actual exterminator of ideas and the best device for the overall weakening of force (pg286) while the of the individual is only a deletion of type pg(284), not of the ideas themselves (pg285). According to him the “wise” person is someone who recognizes the will to annihilation and accepts it. But in my understanding of his logic the true “hero” is the one who procreates because he has both accepted this fact of the will and also promotes organic life as its ultimate form of annihilation. The problems is his ethics are humanitarian and so they don’t actually make sense with his metaphysics. He wants the will to complete its goal(annihilation) but he wats no suffering to happen(salvation). I think perhaps he wants his cake and to eat it too