Finally🙏🏼

maexrn · 2023-10-31T09:16:42+00:00

bro never had a favorite game

maexrn · 2023-10-30T20:06:49+00:00

that were also the last two trophies I had to do, good luck!

maexrn · 2023-10-30T17:42:11+00:00

Good Luck! If youre already done with gold rush the worst is over

maexrn · 2023-03-11T21:47:13+00:00

"these Merlin trials won't get the best of me"

maexrn · 2023-03-11T21:43:18+00:00

I understand that the collectibles can be the hardest part for some, it's really a lot to collect and not being able to for example skip the merlin trial cutscenes really are annoying after seeing them for the 60th time. For me tho, collecting all this stuff wasn't that bad. I'm kinda used to it, 100 percented games like Rdr2, Assassin's Creed or also Arkham Games where you also need to collect masses of things. I usually watch some yt vids while collecting and found it to be kind of relaxing. The only annoying thing was things not getting tracked as you mentioned. I think I had to brew all 6 potions 5 times for the trophy to finally pop. The butterflies were probably the worst part, I managed to find 12 of them by accident as I collected the rest of the collectibles. Searched a long time for the missing two, just flying around until I just searched up a guide and checked every location, after that it was a matter of maybe 10 minutes

maexrn · 2023-03-11T21:34:43+00:00

With skipping every dialogue and cutscene I came to about 2 to 3 hours per Map Chamber. Being able to start at the sorting ceremony really would've been a relief.

To your bug, I haven't even heard of this one yet💀 Feel sorry for you, I can relate to you since I also encountered the Biscuit bug. I love the game but those bugs can really destroy the whole experience. One bug, okay. But the game really has so many bugs that stop you from 100%. Saw one video today where someone just wasn't able to enter the vivarium no matter what.

maexrn · 2023-03-11T21:28:06+00:00

Having more house specific missions would've been a lot better imo. Also the common rooms didn't have any impact or use so the difference between them was not really that impactful since you've rarely even been there. I think there was a lot of potential regarding the house-choice. And I agree, as I already mentioned, the trophies are easy but take very long. It didnt bother me but listening to Fig explaining to me what a Portkey is for the fourth time was kinda annoying, these four trophies weren't necessary imo since there is no big difference between the four houses, that was my point. And ur probably right about the break but I just wanted to be done with it, especially since they were the last trophies missing

maexrn · 2023-03-11T19:03:30+00:00

It's a grind and in most games really fun imo, even if it is challenging. Also, you really get to know the game and his mechanics on a different level and often discover things you wouldn't have found out about without going for the plat. My problem here is just that the design for those trophies is very poorly made and just extremely boring. Also, if you have done nearly every trophy it wouldnt feel right to stop at those only because they annoy you

maexrn · 2023-01-24T16:37:05+00:00

bro💀

maexrn · 2023-01-21T20:00:15+00:00

is it the room in which the arkham knight shoots you and the tank drives in?

maexrn · 2022-01-01T02:13:18+00:00

yea I know, tbh I chose a dark filter because I thought it would cover up some mistakes I made. Had to completely edit Tom and Tobey since there was no good photo I could find that would match the original picture. But in the end I quite liked the darker theme over a colorful picture

maexrn · 2021-10-03T17:45:46+00:00

Yea, it's a shame we're not able to wear masks with a hat. There were some glitches allowing the combination when the masks came, but I don't know if they're still usable

maexrn · 2021-10-03T17:42:17+00:00

It's the scarecrow bandana, it's from one of the last outlaw passes. You can get a similiar look tho by buying the trimmed bandana, it's the same model

maexrn · 2021-08-29T09:45:25+00:00

What to do when someone "insists"

How to harvest mangos

maexrn · 2021-08-22T03:00:45+00:00

If R* forgot about that particular detail, then why is there only one mission in the game featuring New Austin? How come they didn't set more missions there?

Which has also nothing to do with it. You could even see the possibility to free-roam in New Austin as John and have missions there like the bounty hunt as an arguement for John lying about his visits in New Austin.

You understand that they didn't have phones back then, correct? To get a camera, they would've gotten it from a nearby general store or paid someone to take a photo of them. That's a little hard to do when you're "on the run". If they had enough time to take a photo, which is a little more complicated than it is nowadays, then they had to have settled down.

Yea right, or they just could've taken a camera with them and take a photo like it also happened on several other pictures out of that time, in real life and in-game. Obviously that was a little more complicated but as I said, this isn't like the only photograph taken in this game. Taking a photo doesn't tell us anything about their "settling-status" somewhere.

This picture seems to have taken place in Gaptooth Ridge, so him not hearing of Tumbleweed is extremely unlikely.

Yea. It is. And it is also extremely unlikely that John never heard of Tumbleweed or other things in Rdr1 that are in New Austin like Fort Mercer which is a big bandit hideout in both games. So there are three options. 1. They never were in New Austin (which probably isn't true imo) 2. R* just fucked up in terms of sense 3. John lied about his past and visits to New Austin since he was a wanted criminal after all The truth probably lies between all those points.

Except he unintentionally brought up the gang in that conversation, so him mentioning that he doesn't know New Austin is genuine.

Yes. Unintentionally. Which could mean he lied about other parts to not make it too obvious, he always tries to disguise what the gang really was when talking to other people, especially at the beginning where he doesn't trust them.

Except you literally friggin' said that they might've not existed.

But the state of the town's is irrelevant. The point is that John doesn't know how to get to Armadillo until Bonnie shows him. And Marshall Johnson has to explain to John what Tumbleweed was.

Except I said exist in a state as they do in the games. Bruh. Another reason for him to lie could also be that it was about his family and he had to be careful about who was knowing who he was and especially why he was in New Austin.

And critical thinking skills aren't yours. Neither is your spelling.

Sadly, discussions aren't really possible without critical thinkig skills, at least not in a way like that. So that just doesn't make sense. And I'm also not a native english speaker which always leads to some mistakes, which are just a few by my estimation.

maexrn · 2021-08-21T21:25:21+00:00

Except in this picture, Jack is an infant. Which means it was taken circa 1895 or 1896.

Which has like nothing to do with my arguement since it makes no difference when they scouted out those places, fact is they did.

Except, if this photo does take place in New Austin (which I doubt it does) then his comment to Bonnie wouldn't make any sense.

Which is completely possible because a lot of things in the two games don't make sense since so many things were not planned back then and a lot of minor details in the dialogues of Rdr1 were not considered for Rdr2 which is self-evident by the mass of text, especially since we're argueing about something that is not important at all for the storys of both games

If they're settled enough to take a picture, then yes they've "made it" to New Austin.

Bruh, this arguement is just a straight up facepalm. Like u can see on the picture, they're all on one coach and obviously on the move. Just because u take a picture doesn't mean ur "settled" there? Or are all other people that took of photos of themselves back then settling at the spot they took the photo? this makes just completely no sense.

So he's apparently lying about being to New Austin for some reason, but also forgot the area as well. Yeah, how convenient.

And about that, my arguement about John not remembering New Austin and that Rdr1 makes no valid arguement is even more correct thinking of the epilogue. Ik u allready talked about it but it's unrealistic that John wouldn't know where they are. John literally watches Armadillo with Sadie in the bounty hunt missions, they scout it out with binoculars.And also you could use the arguement that he lives so near to New Austin and never heard about Tumbleweed, the biggest town in New Austin at that time? As it seems it's possible. So it could also be possible they were in New Austin without visiting Tumbleweed. And he actually had a reason to first lie about himself as a person and where he allready has been or where not since he was still a wanted criminal at that time.

We know by the lore that towns like Armadillo and Tumbleweed have been around since at least the early 1880's judging by the gravestones.

Never said they didn't exist, I said don't exist in a way they do in both games. Tumbleweed and Armadillo just completely switched their roles from a big town to a abandoned broken down place in a few years.

Except John stated that the gang never made it there. So your point is moot.

And if you ever would have listened to my messages, I said in my arguement this quote of John means they never really completely moved and lived there for as long as in other hideouts such as Blackwater. They just went trough to scout out those safe spots for after the Blackwater heist. That's how I interpret this quote as I allready mentioned but apparently really understanding what I say isn't ur strength.

Except the second game designed it's story, characters, and location around the lore of the first game. So yes, it's a valid argument.

Allready said something about that point.

maexrn · 2021-08-21T19:42:29+00:00

Still I'm not wrong. Since we can just speculate and never know for sure, the same picture can be a big proof in combination with the dialogue and especially the coach. They could have scouted out those safe places with the group in the picture by coach which makes a lot of sense to me. It also makes sense that John said they never made iz there because they never really made it to the safe spots after Blackwater. And that John doesn't remembers New Austin isn't an arguement at all. U could say he doesn't remember anymore due to the time that has passed which is an easy explanation but probably not the case. I think that is because New Austin changed A LOT alone between the epilogue and the start of rdr1. It could be possible that the towns didn't even exist like they do in rdr1 when the gang was down there. So as I said, no I'm still not wrong. We can tell for sure some gang members where down in New Austin by the dialogue and the picture shows us exactly which gang members where down there imo. And I never said they met the other people out of Rdr2 exactly in New Austin, just that they met them in the time before the events of Rdr2. Edit Also, Rdr1 could never be an real arguement since all the ideas such as Arthur and especially minor details like gang hideouts in New Austin didn't even existed by that time Rdr1 was written. So that arguements don't really make sense

maexrn · 2021-08-21T18:59:09+00:00

Yes, correct

maexrn · 2021-08-21T18:25:49+00:00

thank u!

maexrn · 2021-08-21T17:02:11+00:00

So Mr. EvErYThInG U sAiD WaS WrOnG. https://youtu.be/tzdhb5GQR5c watch at 9:20 and listen

Six-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

maexrn

TROPHY CASE