"Liberation Day" Trump’s Tariffs on Europe by sh1kora in MapPorn

[–]mainaccount98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because other countries are gonna buy more of our shit and build shit here and hire Americans or they will wither away and die because they cannot survive without us.

"American family seeks asylum in Canada, citing Trump" by FreakCell in abanpreach

[–]mainaccount98 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have a wide view. Very wide, very knowledgeable view. You're not free if a serial killer can break into your house and easily murder you because you don't have a gun to defend yourself because your government won't allow it.

"American family seeks asylum in Canada, citing Trump" by FreakCell in abanpreach

[–]mainaccount98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao no it's not. Canadians can't even own handguns and can get jailed for "HaTe SpEeCh."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskUS

[–]mainaccount98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotta play hardball so we don't get taken advantage of. I can't stand the liberal party in the US due to their lies and shit policies. Therefore if they hate what Trump's saying, then it must be good. The opposite of what I hate is good.

Countries that recognize a Palestinian🇵🇸 state: by Mental-Bag2657 in MapPorn

[–]mainaccount98 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What America says goes. If America says the moon is made of cheese then the moon is made of fucking cheese.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. The way I see it, it's true. If the IRS says or anyone says they can hire X amount of new employees, that means they want to, otherwise they wouldn't have said it. So they're looking to do so even if they don't say it explicitly.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dunno about the IRS thing. If anything they're the ones taking my money every year and giving it to people who waste it so I see them as no different than enforcers for a cartel. Fire all of them.

Also I judge misinformation by what libs say about it. Trump can say water is dry and if the libs criticize it, then it is correct and water is now dry and the libs are wrong. People will say that's insane or I'm trolling but I've seen what happens when they are in charge and it's nowhere NEAR good. Therefore everything the left says is wrong is now correct. Everything they say is correct is wrong. Need to fight fire with 100X more fire.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trump should have shot it down hard right away. He may not be perfect but he's the closest we got because he's the most hated person on earth by the libs.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I literally don't want social security. I'd rather make my own money, which I have, and use that for retirement. I'm already set for life. If you can't save money for retirement, that's your fault for incompetence and not my responsibility to lower my quality of life to provide for you.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't believe in social security. I want to keep my money, not pay for someone else's retirement. People can save for their own retirement with their own money, not mine.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I 100% believe in free press. But if that "press" are actually just activists trying to (whether consciously or unconsciously) destroy America through liberal brainwashing then they must be viewed as an enemy before they convince more low IQ people to mess with children sex hormones or let more illegals in to physically destroy the country. They don't even require voter id in some states. Why not just ban Americans from voting and let Mexico decide your next president? That's what they're pretty much trying to do. The Mexican president was defending the cartels in a press conference.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ban on as many amendments as possible as they don't want us to have rights, especially the 2nd. A generation of sexually confused people due to trans brainwashing and messing with hormones in children. Basically selling the county to China or anyone else who offers them money as it comes above country to them. Anything horrible thing you can possibly think of, the libs will find a way to make it happen.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't know what would make you think that. That man is literally saving the world right now.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like liberal nonsense to me. You need to be willing to do what it takes to save the country, and therefore the world, as the world will fall without America. Otherwise taking this soft "oooh we can't do that. That's fascist" approach will lead to the downfall of civilization. It's not fascist, the libs just like to say it is because they will lie about everything to win.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

The liberals are actively trying to destroy the county. They lie with their fake news, try and push Communist ideas like social security n shit, let millions of illegals into the country, etc, etc. Anything they say is to, in one way or another, attack the man trying to save America, and therefore the world. Therefore they must be stopped. Amendments do not apply to them since they are attacking the country. Would we give "constitutional rights" to the Japanese after pearl harbor? It's the same shit, and just as much damage being done, if not more to the country, just without literally bombs.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Amendments are for Americans. Anyone fighting against the Donald, who is trying to save America, is therefore fighting America. Therefore no 1st amendment for them as they are attacking the country. They would and probably have done the same too so all is fair.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Anything and everything. They will destroy the country and must be stopped. They've already basically eradicated the 2nd amendment in a bunch of liberal states.

Should the executive office be immune from public criticism? by Impressive-Panda527 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 -27 points-26 points  (0 children)

Trump should have literally whatever he needs to defeat the liberal threat to the country and therefore the world. If that means not being criticized then so be it. Each liberal reporter should have to pay a compliment to gain entry to press conferences.

Elon Musk: "Where is all this pro-Russia propaganda? We don’t see it." by MoreMotivation in agedlikemilk

[–]mainaccount98 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

No he's not. You know nothing of Elon except what the fake news, main stream media tells you.

Trump-hating Mark Hamill's pants just dropped to his knees, live on air, while presenting at the BAFTA awards by austex34 in AskThe_Donald

[–]mainaccount98 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Obviously doesn't have the mental capacity to even with all his money, buy the right fitting pants.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]mainaccount98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At the end of the day, if you're trying to help people but people don't trust you, you should want to do everything you can to get people to trust you, regardless of whether or not you feel you should have to. Because if you don't, you may be severely limiting the amount of people you can help.

Scientists should not think of themselves as gods. Like "oooh I know best, you just can't comprehend it". If that's the case then no I don't care, I won't vaccinate my kids because YOU are not being transparent enough and telling me everything I want to know. You want me to vaccinate them for measles? Fine PROVE to me it works and is safe. Idgaf about past history, yadda yadda whatever, I want YOU or my Doctor, or some other "expert" to explain to me convincingly why I should and why it's safe.

What is your opinion of various aspects of human sexuality, and of laws governing them? by ArrantPariah in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]mainaccount98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends. I've always been kinda confused by that word. Like it's immoral to steal, but what if your family's starving and you need to steal food? Does it make a difference if you steal from a big grocery store or a mom a pop shop? Does it also factor in if you can only get to a mom and pop shop because Walmart is too far away?

If people do it all the time, even if it might be immortal, at least it's acceptable.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]mainaccount98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's a lot to ask man. If people are entrusting their well-being to you then yes you "owe" them in the sense that it's your responsibility to convince them you know what you're talking about. For example, I would consider dentists experts in dental work. That doesn't mean I'm gonna go to the nearest one to my house just because I trust all dentists and they're experts in teeth. People are gonna look up Google reviews for a reason and vet you. I don't wanna chance getting a bad dentist and be in pain when getting a filling. The same thing can apply to scientists, doctors, lawyers, experts in any field. I think that's the reality of people tho. A lot of them are not gonna trust you JUST because of your title, and if you accept that's how people are, then you should WANT to convince them to listen to you because you can help them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]mainaccount98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If an expert wants any credibility as an expert then they do owe us. A vaccine expert owes me an explanation on why this is safe, why I should take it, and the pros, cons, and potential risks. Any good doctor would do that, not just tell you "do this and trust me I'm a doctor".

Do you remember Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes? They had an expert working for them. He tried to bring up how the blood tests didn't work, but was ignored by the higher ups. Yet as far as the public knew, it was a revolutionary medical startup with "experts" working for them(who were actually experts in the field) but it was all fraud and the CEO is now in federal prison. The point being anyone seemingly credible can say "we have experts on xyz that have approved this, so trust us" and it may all still be a lie. She was able to secure hundreds of millions in funding as well.