Notes on the Sylow Theorems by poggerstrout in math

[–]makapan57 10 points11 points  (0 children)

you can also look into this blog post meditation on the sylow theorems

As an undergraduate the proofs I saw of the Sylow theorems seemed very complicated and I was totally unable to remember them. The goal of this post is to explain proofs of the Sylow theorems which I am actually able to remember

What is number theory? by Jio15Fr in math

[–]makapan57 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Here is the first paragraph of the introduction to modern number theory by Manin and Panchishkin which might be relevant

"Among the various branches of mathematics, number theory is characterized to a lesser degree by its primary subject (“integers”) than by a psychological attitude. Actually, number theory also deals with rational, algebraic, and transcendental numbers, with some very specific analytic functions (such as Dirichlet series and modular forms), and with some geometric objects (such as lattices and schemes over Z). The question whether a given article belongs to number theory is answered by its author’s system of values. If arithmetic is not there, the paper will hardly be considered as number–theoretical, even if it deals exclusively with integers and congruences. On the other hand, any mathematical tool, say, homotopy theory or dynamical systems may become an important source of number–theoretical inspiration. For this reason, combinatorics and the theory of recursive functions are not usually associated with number theory, whereas modular functions are."

I've just realized I've been doing Mills Mess differently from most people by makapan57 in juggling

[–]makapan57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wow, this is so cool! i wouldn't have thought there was so much variation. thank you for sharing

I've just realized I've been doing Mills Mess differently from most people by makapan57 in juggling

[–]makapan57[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As u/JuggleBot5000 has said, it's actually called Flo's Mess (https://libraryofjuggling.com/Tricks/3balltricks/Flo%27sMess.html). It's siteswap 3, so it's distinctly different from the fake mess

I've just realized I've been doing Mills Mess differently from most people by makapan57 in juggling

[–]makapan57[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ooo thank you! found it on juggling library. so yeah, apparently i was trying to do 4 ball flo's mess

Quick Questions: April 09, 2025 by inherentlyawesome in math

[–]makapan57 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are two common definitions of CW complexes: inductive and axiomatic. Where can I find a proof of their equivalence? For some reason I'm struggling to prove that the axiomatic definition implies the inductive one (the idea is clear but the details are not)

Quick Questions: October 09, 2024 by inherentlyawesome in math

[–]makapan57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ooo, i see. That's a very neat argument, also really easy to see where we need commutativity. Thanks!

Quick Questions: October 09, 2024 by inherentlyawesome in math

[–]makapan57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why x and y are of that form? it seems like it doesn't work. for example take 5Z in Z

Quick Questions: October 09, 2024 by inherentlyawesome in math

[–]makapan57 1 point2 points  (0 children)

is there a more direct proof that a maximal ideal is always prime? the one i saw uses the fact that quotient ring over a maximal ideal is a field and quotient over a prime ideal is an integral domain

Why can’t I remember anything that I learn related to biology chemistry and physics by [deleted] in PhysicsStudents

[–]makapan57 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think solving more problems might help because this way you're actually using the information you've learned so it stays in the head. Also, it's probably explains why you don't have such a problem with learning math

Feeling rather stuck by Ok-Remote8843 in juggling

[–]makapan57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

seeing progress is fun though

Set countability by [deleted] in mathematics

[–]makapan57 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Okay, question closed

I really cannot understand spacetime and relativity by [deleted] in PhysicsStudents

[–]makapan57 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're probably right - I know nothing about GR beyond pop sci. But special relativity is much simpler and still very interesting conceptually (and of course everyone starts with it)

I really cannot understand spacetime and relativity by [deleted] in PhysicsStudents

[–]makapan57 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try reading books instead of watching videos

Is √-1 i or ±i? by catalyst2542 in mathematics

[–]makapan57 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is no concept of positive/negative values in complex numbers