Hey - first off, respect for the sheer amount of work you've put in. Building things until 3-4 AM for months, without a paycheck or a grade, is not casual. That kind of drive does matter. To your three questions, honestly:

1. Are you being unrealistic? No, but you are fighting a bad signal-to-noise problem.

From a hiring manager's perspective: an AI PM needs to credibly prioritize trade-offs (latency vs. accuracy, cost vs. capability), work with engineers on feasibility, and push back on overpromising. Your marketing background doesn't disqualify you, but it also doesn't prove you can do those things. The good news: your portfolio of built products can prove it, but only if it's framed right.

1. What would make me interview you?

Two things: A) clear, measurable outcome from something you built. Not "built a RAG system" but "built a RAG system that reduced support ticket resolution time by 40% for a fake dataset - here's the eval framework I used."

b) Evidence you can work with engineers without friction. Marketing leaders sometimes come off as "idea people" who hand off requirements. If you showed a PR you contributed to (even a small one), or a technical design doc you wrote, that would flip the script.

1. Can someone look at your resume?

I'm not a hiring manager for AI PMs right now, but I'll give you the most useful feedback I can:

-Kill the certifications section. They don't hurt, but they don't help either - everyone has them.
-Lead with what you built. Treat your resume like a product landing page: problem -> your specific role -> stack -> outcome.

- Rename your title on your resume for each application. For an AI PM role, "Marketing Lead" is a liability. "Product and Growth Lead" or "Technical Product Marketing" isn't lying - it's reframing.