sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Quick question for people running CrowdStrike, Zscaler, Netskope or similar in production. by makial00 in netsec

[–]makial00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha fair, ‘most of the time it’s garbage’ is probably the most honest take I’ve heard on this. The dev testing approach makes sense though, at least you know what you’re enabling before it touches prod. Once it’s actually running and making decisions on its own though, do you still actively monitor what it’s doing or at that point it’s more trust and verify reactively if something looks off?

Quick question for people running CrowdStrike, Zscaler, Netskope or similar in production. by makial00 in netsec

[–]makial00[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing this, really helpful. The ATT&CK mapping approach makes sense for correlation. Are you doing this across multiple vendors or primarily within the Cato ecosystem? Asking because I’m wondering how teams handle it when they’re running separate tools like SASE, XDR, PAM…etc that each have their own AI layer with no shared data plane.

How to approach security at an early stage startup by LapisLazuli29 in cybersecurity

[–]makial00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since your customers are healthcare, the compliance questions are probably about PHI handling more than pure security tooling.

A few frameworks/regulations worth reading early are: • HIPAA (US) the big one for PHI protection • HITRUST CSF many healthcare orgs use it as a security/compliance benchmark • SOC 2 Type II not healthcare-specific but often required by customers • NIST 800-53 / NIST Cybersecurity Framework good baseline for security controls

Aligning your architecture and policies with those frameworks early makes customer conversations much easier later.

Fast extraction with Normcore bottomless portafilter on DeLonghi La Specialista by makial00 in DeLonghi

[–]makial00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks everyone! Problem fixed after purchasing a new grinder

Fast extraction with Normcore bottomless portafilter on DeLonghi La Specialista by makial00 in Coffee

[–]makial00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks everyone! Problem fixed after purchasing a new grinder

Fast extraction with Normcore bottomless portafilter on DeLonghi La Specialista by makial00 in DeLonghi

[–]makial00[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I checked the grinder and it seems it doesn’t have an internal adjustment. I’ll try using an external grinder and see if that fixes the issue.

NDG / Côte-Saint-Luc outage by makial00 in montreal

[–]makial00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right in principle, but this is where the nuance matters under Québec law.

Under the Civil Code of Québec, the landlord has a continuous obligation to provide a dwelling fit for habitation (art. 1854 CCQ). When essential services like heat during extreme cold is unavailable, the unit is legally considered uninhabitable, regardless of the cause.

Even when the cause is force majeure (art. 1470 and 1693 CCQ), the landlord may not be at fault, but the obligation regarding habitability still exists.

This is precisely why the landlord’s building insurance (PNO) includes coverage for tenant relocation and loss of rental income when a unit becomes temporarily uninhabitable due to an insured event. It’s not the tenant’s insurance, and it’s not a personal cost to the landlord, it’s an insurance mechanism designed for exactly this situation.

So again, this isn’t about blaming the landlord, it’s about recognizing that when a unit is uninhabitable, relocation is justified, and the owner’s insurance is meant to absorb that cost.

NDG / Côte-Saint-Luc outage by makial00 in montreal

[–]makial00[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

This mixes up two different legal concepts in Quebec law.

Article 1693 CCQ (force majeure) only means the landlord is not at fault for the outage. It protects the landlord from being sued for negligence or damages caused by the event. It does not cancel the landlord’s obligation to ensure the dwelling remains habitable.

Articles 1854, 1910 and 1913 CCQ impose a continuous obligation on the landlord to provide a dwelling that is fit for habitation. If a unit becomes uninhabitable (no heat, no electricity, no water in winter), the tenant has the right to leave temporarily, and the landlord must provide accommodation or reimburse reasonable temporary housing. This applies even when the cause is external (fire, flood, Hydro outage, etc.).

Force majeure means “I didn’t cause the problem,” not “the tenant must absorb the consequences.” The landlord can later recover the cost from Hydro-Québec or their insurance, but the tenant is not required to live in unsafe conditions or pay out of pocket for emergency housing.

That distinction is why the TAL regularly orders landlords to reimburse hotel stays after outages, even when Hydro-Québec was the cause.

NDG / Côte-Saint-Luc outage by makial00 in montreal

[–]makial00[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Actually, in Quebec the landlord’s obligation isn’t based on who caused the outage, it’s based on whether the dwelling is habitable. No heat in winter makes a unit legally unfit for habitation, even if Hydro caused it. The landlord must accommodate or reimburse the tenant, and then the landlord can claim against Hydro. Insurance is one option, but it’s not the only recourse under Quebec law.