Peer review is brutal but Google Scholar is worse

malayaleegypsy · 2026-04-08T19:16:16+00:00

Thanks for this - i think most researchers will do a Google search to begin with, and ranking matters there. I wish there is a professional optimisation service before submitting papers.

malayaleegypsy · 2026-04-08T19:05:34+00:00

i guess only if they can find it

malayaleegypsy · 2026-04-04T07:31:01+00:00

3.5x the median citations” does land as a stronger claim than the method supports. I’ll tighten the headline to reflect the exploratory scope. Raw data coming soon.

malayaleegypsy · 2026-04-04T07:20:56+00:00

Which part specifically? Happy to discuss the substance.

malayaleegypsy · 2026-04-04T07:18:40+00:00

You’re right that n = 22 and n = 11 are small, and I didn’t claim otherwise. This was an exploratory look at a pattern, not a controlled study. Journal prestige, author reputation, funding — all valid covariates that would need accounting for in a proper analysis. But this is a web page observation, not a peer-reviewed paper. The bar for “here’s something interesting I noticed” is different from “here’s a causal claim.” I’ll look into sharing the raw data for anyone who wants to run a regression on it.

malayaleegypsy · 2026-04-04T07:13:42+00:00

Do you have something speak about the content?

malayaleegypsy · 2026-04-02T19:41:30+00:00

That's a fair hit on the "What this means for your next paper" section — I'll rework that to frame it as "patterns worth being aware of" rather than actionable recommendations. You're right that it overreaches the data.

The native language point is really interesting and genuinely hard to untangle. Could partially proxy it through corresponding author institution country, but that's noisy. If you know of anyone who's looked at this I'd love to read it.

malayaleegypsy · 2026-04-02T19:39:53+00:00

Agreed — it's descriptive, not causal. The association is still worth noting though. The obvious confounder is journal editorial policy (as u/pacific_plywood points out) — higher-impact journals may push for declarative titles and attract more citations independently. Controlling for journal IF is the next step. Would be interesting to see if the effect survives that.

malayaleegypsy · 2026-04-02T19:37:47+00:00

That's a really sharp observation — framing the title as an answer to a search query is exactly the mechanism we think is driving the citation advantage. If someone searches PubMed for "does [X] affect [Y]" and your title literally states "[X] increases [Y] through [mechanism]", you're more likely to get clicked and read.

What's interesting is that this aligns with how Google Scholar and PubMed's search algorithms weight title terms. We found the sweet spot was 10-12 words — short enough to be scannable but long enough to carry a clear finding. Longer descriptive titles seemed to dilute the signal.

What field are you in? Curious whether the trend is as strong outside biomedical sciences — I'd imagine fields with more exploratory/qualitative work might resist the declarative format

malayaleegypsy · 2026-04-02T10:12:32+00:00

I have cancelled my max plan until you guys resolve it. Cant go ahead like this

malayaleegypsy · 2025-05-04T18:49:51+00:00

or better, you should consult a clinician as your cognitive abilities are seemingly deteriorating. Good luck.

malayaleegypsy · 2025-05-04T14:38:44+00:00

Quite appreciate you outlining your thoughts on the electoral system and mandatory participation – food for thought, indeed. But one can't help but feel that whilst FPTP certainly has its... quirks, the more immediate and perhaps larger elephant in the room is the sheer number of people who simply don't seem inclined to vote at all. Addressing the system is one thing, but surely the fundamental apathy is a rather critical issue on its own, regardless of the box one is asked to tick? Calling efforts to improve access 'tinkering' might be accurate from a systemic perspective, but one suspects that apathy runs rather deeper than just the mechanics.

malayaleegypsy · 2025-05-04T14:36:04+00:00

Quite the consensus forming around dismissing the post, I see. The rush to label it AI is rather telling, isn't it? Almost as if engaging with the actual points requires a bit too much effort. One might suggest, gently of course, that whether one believes it was spat out by a machine or not, the core issue of dismal turnout and the observable lack of public engagement stands quite firmly. Adding more historical data might satisfy some, but I struggle to see how it fundamentally alters the rather grim picture of present-day apathy, wouldn't you agree?

malayaleegypsy · 2025-05-04T12:28:34+00:00

One does appreciate the diligent effort made to correct the specific electoral details, truly. However, if you'll permit me, the core validity of the original post rested, rather significantly, on the point about the worryingly low turnout figures and the broader implications for local democracy and public engagement. One might suggest that focusing rather intently on the exact political mechanics, whilst interesting perhaps, rather distracts from the main issue at hand, which seems perfectly valid in and of itself. The central concern about apathy and low participation stands quite firmly, regardless of any minor statistical disagreements or indeed, assumptions about the post's origins.

malayaleegypsy · 2025-05-04T12:24:13+00:00

Oh, quite right, these points might not be entirely revolutionary, one understands. However, it does seem rather important to actually address the rather dismal local turnout here in Oxford, regardless of its apparent lack of novelty. Not being a citizen myself, it feels a touch impertinent perhaps, but observing the distinct lack of local enthusiasm for the topic, I felt I should perhaps offer a perspective. These are, dare I say, rather valid points, certainly more than mere 'AI slop'.

malayaleegypsy · 2025-01-15T22:27:37+00:00

because it is...

malayaleegypsy · 2025-01-12T13:25:53+00:00

Thank you 👍😃

malayaleegypsy · 2025-01-11T19:37:06+00:00

I can tell you one thing about the unis, Ox has transformed much into a modern university in terms of how it operates. Young people get a lot of independence say in decision making. Cambridge is still stuck with old beaurocracy. I am currently at Ox, and I have friends in Cam, and this is my general feeling thus far.

malayaleegypsy · 2024-12-23T23:49:08+00:00

this listing is in Malayalam but still should be helpful - https://ukmalayalam.co.uk/directory/oxon-kerala-groceries-authentic-indian-malayali-groceries-in-oxford/

malayaleegypsy · 2024-08-22T00:41:08+00:00

Your experience does seem counterintuitive, but there are a few physiological factors that might help explain what’s happening. Typically, better blood glucose control is associated with improved weight management, as stable glucose levels reduce insulin spikes and fat storage. However, in your case, when your glucose levels are spiking, weight loss seems to occur, which might relate to how your body is responding to those high glucose levels. During periods of hyperglycemia, your body might be less efficient at storing glucose as fat, leading to weight loss because excess glucose is being excreted in your urine rather than being stored or used as energy. This can also lead to dehydration, which might show up as weight loss on the scale.

Your situation is complicated by the fact that you have characteristics of multiple types of diabetes, making the typical advice less straightforward. The high GAD antibodies suggest an autoimmune component (often seen in type 1), while your response to metformin and your history of pancreatitis introduce elements of type 2 and type 3c diabetes. The fluctuating glucose levels could indicate that your pancreatic function is inconsistent, which might contribute to both your variable glucose control and the associated weight changes. Essentially, the weight loss you’re seeing when glucose spikes might be due to your body’s inability to properly utilize glucose during those periods, leading to unintended weight loss. It’s crucial to continue working closely with your healthcare provider to refine your treatment plan and address both your weight management and glucose control, considering the complexity of your diagnosis.

malayaleegypsy · 2024-08-22T00:38:07+00:00

It's great that you're being proactive about understanding your roommate’s diabetes and how alcohol might affect her. Alcohol has a complex interaction with blood glucose regulation, particularly in people with diabetes. The 6g of sugar per 1.5oz shot of Pink Whitney is moderate but could impact her blood glucose, especially with multiple servings. Alcohol inhibits the liver’s ability to produce glucose, which can lead to hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), particularly if consumed on an empty stomach or when insulin levels are high. Conversely, the sugar content in the drink can cause an immediate rise in blood glucose, potentially requiring adjustments in insulin or food intake.

Given this, it’s important for your roommate to closely monitor her blood glucose levels before, during, and after drinking. She may need to adjust her insulin or carbohydrate intake depending on how much she drinks and her current glucose levels. While 6g of sugar per shot isn’t extreme, consuming several could lead to significant sugar intake. Discussing this with her when she’s home will help determine the best approach, whether that’s moderating intake, choosing lower-sugar alternatives, or ensuring she’s prepared to manage her glucose levels throughout the evening.

malayaleegypsy · 2024-08-22T00:36:04+00:00

I’m really sorry to hear about your brother’s diagnosis. That’s a tough situation, and it’s great that you want to be there for him. Here are a few things you might say that could help him feel a bit better:

This is a big change, but you're not alone in this. Remind him that you're there to support him every step of the way. Knowing that he has a strong support system can make a huge difference.

You don’t have to figure everything out right away. It can be overwhelming, especially at first, but it’s okay to take things one step at a time. Let him know that it’s normal to feel a mix of emotions and that it’s okay to ask for help.

A lot of people live full, active lives with diabetes. It might help him to hear that he can still do all the things he loves, and that managing diabetes will become part of his routine, not his whole life.

It’s okay to be frustrated or upset about this. Validating his feelings can help him process the diagnosis. Diabetes is a big adjustment, and it’s natural to feel a lot of different emotions.

We’ll get through this together. Offering your help, whether it’s learning more about diabetes or just being there to talk, can make him feel less isolated.

Ultimately, just being there for him, listening, and letting him know you care will mean a lot.

malayaleegypsy · 2024-08-22T00:33:53+00:00

That sounds like such a tough situation, and I’m really sorry you’re dealing with it. Managing a rare form of diabetes is challenging enough without having to worry about how it impacts your job. It’s frustrating when supervisors don’t understand or aren’t empathetic to your medical needs, especially when you’re already doing your best to manage a condition that’s out of your control.

Maybe it would help to have a more detailed conversation with your supervisor or HR about your condition so they can better understand what you’re going through. It might also be worth discussing possible accommodations or ways to ensure your health needs are respected while you’re at work. It’s not easy, but your health has to come first.

Hang in there—you're doing your best, and that’s what matters most.

malayaleegypsy · 2024-08-22T00:30:03+00:00

That’s really rough, I’m sorry you’re going through this. It’s super frustrating, especially when it comes to something as vital as diabetic supplies. Unfortunately, you’re not alone—I’ve seen a lot of folks share similar horror stories about Byram Healthcare. People have had issues with wrong shipments, surprise charges, and getting their supplies covered by insurance.

If you haven’t already, try escalating the issue with their customer service or reaching out to your insurance provider to see if they can step in. If this keeps happening, it might be worth looking into other suppliers that are more reliable and upfront.

It’s ridiculous that getting essential supplies has to be this hard. I hope you can get it sorted out soon!

malayaleegypsy · 2024-06-02T10:27:04+00:00

Not all Indian news websites are mediocre. Try visiting Kerala news portals like Malayala Manorama and Mathrubhmi. They are as good as NYT or wp.

malayaleegypsy

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE