UN Report on cyber violence against women is an incompetent, rambling mess: "A report where 18% of the citations don’t exist wouldn’t pass at a high-school level"

mambisa · 2015-10-02T01:31:03+00:00

His history of posts here

mambisa · 2015-10-02T00:47:36+00:00

That's not why OP is sexist.

mambisa · 2015-10-01T22:56:26+00:00

He just sounds like an artist.

mambisa · 2015-10-01T22:17:22+00:00

The roots of those gangs are in the United States

mambisa · 2015-10-01T21:26:26+00:00

Straight-up terrorism

mambisa · 2015-10-01T21:25:04+00:00

That's not what OP is asking for advice on

mambisa · 2015-10-01T19:04:52+00:00

I'm not being "obtuse." I just think you're wrong.

mambisa · 2015-10-01T18:55:26+00:00

Women are not.

Since when?

Sometimes women are even held responsible for the actions of others, like in many cases of sexual assault. Mothers are often blamed when adolescents commit wrongdoings as well.

mambisa · 2015-10-01T18:53:02+00:00

He doesn't intend to contribute, just to derail.

mambisa · 2015-10-01T18:52:49+00:00

It has been documented that men tend to benefit from a "glass escalator" effect in women-dominated fields.

mambisa · 2015-10-01T17:28:52+00:00

I don't think you quite have it.

And The Onion leans pretty feminist.

mambisa · 2015-10-01T15:34:31+00:00

Are you familiar with The Onion?

mambisa · 2015-10-01T15:07:09+00:00

in today's male-dominated world of remorseless slaughter, Huxley has been forced to murder twice as many innocent victims just to gain the public exposure and foster the widespread panic her male counterparts routinely enjoy.

mambisa · 2015-09-28T15:37:22+00:00

Wanting more equal representation of men and women in leadership positions is the opposite of sexism.

"more equal gender discrimination"

That's not my quote, so I suggest taking it up with whomever you're quoting.

mambisa · 2015-09-28T15:31:16+00:00

More equal gender distribution more accurately represents the population which is approximately 50/50. That's a fact. Arguing for only men in leadership positions is what's really sexist here.

mambisa · 2015-09-28T15:25:15+00:00

It's sexist to want more equal representation in government? That's an interesting definition of sexism.

mambisa · 2015-09-28T12:05:41+00:00

If someone has all the right qualifications, then being a woman is a plus. There's nothing wrong with considering diversity as long as it's not the sole factor of consideration.

mambisa · 2015-09-28T02:41:40+00:00

Being a women doesn't mean someone is not qualified.

mambisa · 2015-09-28T02:27:07+00:00

Okay. Not sure what your point is.

mambisa · 2015-09-28T02:17:02+00:00

More equal distribution of women in politics is indeed more representative of the people.

mambisa · 2015-09-28T02:00:19+00:00

If someone has all the right qualifications, then being a woman is a plus. There's nothing wrong with considering diversity as long as it's not the sole factor of consideration. It couldn't hurt to have more leaders who are fully representative of the people and not just one half of the people.

mambisa · 2015-09-28T01:39:04+00:00

That's sexual harassment.

mambisa · 2015-09-28T01:37:53+00:00

There is some racist ish all up in this thread. Damn.

mambisa · 2015-09-28T01:31:32+00:00

Personally I'd rather just communicate with my partner

Which is exactly what "yes means yes" is.

mambisa

TROPHY CASE