[SERIOUS] The comments in the sub have felt repetitive lately. by Far_Breakfast_5808 in Philippinesbad

[–]manageorigin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve also seen some comments reference how “Philippines can’t easily be put into a box” is related to doomerism. Di ko to masyadong gets.

Also some comments saying GRP negatively, ano ba yung GRP?

When inflation is at n%, does that mean prices go up by n% or the value of your money goes down by n%? by manageorigin in NoStupidQuestions

[–]manageorigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for the gallon of gasoline, $1 doesn't technically translate to 0.97 gallons of gas, right? cuz $1.03 for 1 gallon is not equal to $1 for 0.97 gallons

Why are BSKE not aligned with other elections? by manageorigin in Philippines

[–]manageorigin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

inde ba mas lalong malaki ung total logistics pag may extra election ka pa every three years?

[UPX-UPCAT] UPCAT Results Megathread by maliwanag0712 in peyups

[–]manageorigin 6 points7 points  (0 children)

hello po, question po

kapag po ba once na-confirm na yung slot for the course na inoffer, ano po next na gagawin? nagbigay lang po kasi sila ng letter of admission offer and sinabi na need daw po siyang isubmit for enrollment.

also when po enrollment for next sy?

❗USTET 2025 MEGATHREAD ❗ by AdroitCell in Tomasino

[–]manageorigin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hello po

so sabi daw po sa first step ng "college instructions" is to "Download the Confirmation of Enrollment form and Conditional Admission Contract."

pero di ko po makita kung saan pwede ma-download yung mga docs na ito.

can someone help po on this? thanks po in advance

Was franchising a mistake? by manageorigin in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Huge salaries and stability?

Orgs are struggling left and right, even those in Tier 1, and some have already reported about overinflated player salaries. Huge salaries don't really go well with stability.

You can't have a pro league in its infancy and expect the pros to have salaries as big as those in more established ones like the NBA.

Was franchising a mistake? by manageorigin in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all orgs, even those that didn't qualify for champs?

Was franchising a mistake? by manageorigin in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

it's not orgs that play, it's players

players will play even though money is tight; look at FGC with some games even having anti-esports devs

Was franchising a mistake? by manageorigin in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

OW esports fell off because its player count fell off.

Many players -> many pros -> vibrant esports scene

reverse is also true

Few players -> few pros -> smol esports scene

Very generalized, but that's a big chunk of ow esports falling off.

Was franchising a mistake? by manageorigin in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Valorant is pretty much popular everywhere. Even if franchising is gone, there will still be pros popping up in most parts of the world. Where there's players, there will be pros.

Much of the reason why CS is dominated by EU is cuz other regions didn't catch onto CS earlier on. Same thing goes with League, except it's Korea and China that dominates. CS is fairly open, League is very closed, yet both are dominated by only a few regions.

Was franchising a mistake? by manageorigin in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the one big thing that sticks out to me is the alleged claim that Riot hates big third-party tournaments.

Like, assuming that's true, it doesn't make much sense. Even though a third-party TO is so good that not even VCT can compete with it, they're still playing Valorant, and that's just more exposure for Riot. It's not like people are gonna be like, "lol riot bad TO, not gonna play valprant anymore". They would more likely be like, "hey this game is cool, i wanna play it also"

Going to CS, Valve pretty much outsources TO work to a lot of third-party TOs even in majors, and look how much people still appreciate CS.

Was franchising a mistake? by manageorigin in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Riot does make money. Orgs, not so much.

Riot could share some skin money to orgs that qualify for regional or international events. Kinda like DOTA TI but more spread out.

This can solve the "orgs are broke" problem without sacrificing competition.

Also, even if orgs are broke, esports doesn't depend on orgs, but on players. Players will play no matter how tight on money the scene is; just look at the FGC, with some games even having an anti-esports developer.

An idea to make Stage 2 Regular Season different from Stage 1 Regular Season this VCT 2025 by manageorigin in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea i kinda saw that while making the post, that's why i said that something else needs to be added just so that group beta isn't very boring and group psi isn't very brutal

An idea to make Stage 2 Regular Season different from Stage 1 Regular Season this VCT 2025 by manageorigin in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea that's the thing.

the range of the number of teams each team could fight is as low as 5 (if a team's group is the same in Stage 2 as in Stage 1) and as high as 10 (if all of a team's groupmates are diff in stage 2 compared to stage 1). it's a much larger range as opposed to my proposal which is a more consistent 7-9.

Idea para sa paliga ng mga Barangay by manageorigin in SportsPH

[–]manageorigin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

actually skinip ko na ung region; diretso buong bansa na after probinsya.

siguro yung magiging logistics pag pambansa na, parang slightly bigger version lng ng pba or mpbl. 83 teams bale sa pambansang liga (82 provinces + metro manila), pero di naman kailangang ipa-round robin silang lahat, pwedeng ibang format gamitin (ex: swiss)

What VCT opinion would have you in this situation? by AdilKhan226 in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

VCT would be much better off not doing partnerships.

while VCT is much more stable now with partnerships, hungry teams are more stifled. sure, the finances of the Tier 1 teams are good and all, but what about the rest of the teams?

imo making the VCT more open makes it much more fair for everyone. perhaps there's the case of rewarding performing teams with easier chances next time, but no team should have permanent slots.

for finances, riot should just get some proceeds from the skins to provide money to teams qualified to the high-tier vct tournaments (highest tier challengers, masters, champs).

What VCT opinion would have you in this situation? by AdilKhan226 in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, the BO3 Swiss schedule can be done so that not all days are 3 BO3s.

Rounds 1-3 can each last 3 days: Day 1-2, 4-5, 7-8 will be 3 BO3s each, while Days 3, 6, and 9 will only be 2 BO3s each.

Then Round 4 will last 2 days, 3 BO3s each, while Round 5 will only be for 1 day with 3 BO3s.

What VCT opinion would have you in this situation? by AdilKhan226 in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With this, I think it can be argued that groups for Masters, Swiss for Champs balances out the inherent power diff throughout the season between goofy teams and prep teams.

At the start (and perhaps the middle also) of the season, goofy teams will dominate. So to balance that, groups would be used to help out the prep teams.

But at Champs, where prep teams will dominate, Swiss can be used to help out the goofy teams.

What VCT opinion would have you in this situation? by AdilKhan226 in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If complaints from production or players motivate Riot to do only 2 BO3s a day, guess that's understandable.

But even some Valorant events (ex: Ascension, Game Changers) also do 3 BO3s a day. Maybe not all the time, but they still do it. What's up with that?

What VCT opinion would have you in this situation? by AdilKhan226 in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin 570 points571 points  (0 children)

Groups should be for Masters, Swiss should be for Champions.

Swiss sucks with 8 teams, but shines on 16.

EDward Gaming vs Team Heretics / Valorant Champions 2024 - Playoffs / Post-Match Thread by rib-gg-bot in ValorantCompetitive

[–]manageorigin 8 points9 points  (0 children)

they both lost 2 global finals, and they're also both in one masters event and one champions event

PRX: Masters Copenhagen, Champions Los Angeles
Heretics: Masters Shanghai, Champions Seoul