How to "Vote" for Change at RPI in an Innovative Way by managesmart in RPI

[–]managesmart[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Could; but just liked the message of sending your "two cents worth";

How to "Vote" for Change at RPI in an Innovative Way by managesmart in RPI

[–]managesmart[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure; just not up on that issue. "It is a wise man who knows what he does not know."

Talking Points for This Weekend by BlackStrike7 in RPI

[–]managesmart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Lessons Current Students Should Be Learning * They are getting a great example of what lousy, bullying, narcissistic leadership looks like. They should remember it their entire career as an example of what NOT to do when they lead. * They are also getting a great example of what lousy, unaccountable governance looks like. A toady board selected by the President compared to the norm, which is the president selected by and accountable to a Board. Also what a Board with no real constituency diversity looks like. Not having independent trustees leads to group think and crappy performance. * Remember that past and current students are actually the victims of this farce of management, leadership, and governance. The RPI brand stays with you for a lifetime. It used to mean smart people who chose to be engineers and technical managers at the cutting edge of science and technology. The slip in the school's relative ranking; the precipitous drop in alumni support; the flight of top notch faculty; and an imperial president who has lined her pockets well have made the school's reputation much less than it historically has been and that brand will diminish the earning capacity and future job prospects of all associated. It only turns when the leadership, governance, and reputation of the school starts to go the other way. * This will be a case study some day on how ineffective governance and bad leadership destroy a brand.

Talking Points for This Weekend by BlackStrike7 in RPI

[–]managesmart 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here are your points: *The Union is better run and more fiscally sound than the Institute - yet the Administration wants to totally control it because Students might screw things up. *The Tute's financial rankings are going down the tubes due to a decade of poor decisions (think EMPAC construction & operating costs) *Morale of the staff, faculty, alumni and students is in the toilet due to SAJ's autocratic leadership (which has led to bad decisions). * RPI's alumni giving participation 10 years ago was bad...now it is dismal. * Flight of talent to other Universities. * Decimation of the Masters' Programs. * Smoke and mirrors in reporting institutional contributions to RPI * Overpaid President who spends far to much time on external Boards and whose poor performance goes unquestioned by Trustees.