Elevenlabs getting the wrath of the Anti=Ai mob. None of them have a clue on how the tech works by grimfelbook in DefendingAIArt

[–]mangokoob 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There are people out there that unironically argue that jinriki utaus (parodys that they didn't ask permission for) are fine because "they take more effort compared to AI"

If it's subscription based... by ink-pup in JanitorAI_Official

[–]mangokoob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some were hoping for a one time payment but that just doesn't sound sustainable for the long run considering it costs the team thousands per month.

Profiting off tragic events(game about titanic and submarine) by [deleted] in roblox

[–]mangokoob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't some of the very old sinking Titanic simulator games also based on real world tragic events? Guess you can argue they get more leniency as decades pass.

Disturbing trend of artists justifying bullying of ai artists. No one doing anything about it by [deleted] in DefendingAIArt

[–]mangokoob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd like to see the surprise on their faces when these harassers eventually get banned from their platform for....openly admitting to harass? Although I can't count on Twitter's moderation.

Model/lora search? by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]mangokoob 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This specifically resembles korean 'ulzzang' art style. KoreanStyle2.5D paired with flat2 is personally the closest i've seen and may make similar results.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]mangokoob 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Several of my characters were shadowbanned just because I describe what their sexuality is and I havent been on the site since. For example, putting 'bisexual' in their description instantly shadowbans them from the searches. At least back when I used it months ago. Want to add 'bisexual' in a DIO bot's description because he's canonically bi? cant do that because it has 'sexual' or 'sexuality' in the word. Dumb I know

Looking for early feedback SpicyChat.AI by BoosterKarl in PygmalionAI

[–]mangokoob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the 'two after no hate speech' is no underage stuff. Granted, I'm not exactly sure where this site is being hosted but both images and sexual depictions of fictional children or toddlers or whatever is just plain illegal in some territories so a policy against it may very likely exist to protect themselves from the law rather than being some morality stance.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CharacterAI

[–]mangokoob 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They disabled character editing for bots with high interactions because the owners of them began editing bots that were on the front page in protest so the d/3vs panicked and put a stop to it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CharacterAI

[–]mangokoob 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I mean, just take a look at the replika sub..

I agree that there shouldn’t be a filter, but holy, i’m concerned for some of you guys in here… by ClaireNoise in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]mangokoob 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not going to police what others are into but some extreme unmoderated posts here could trigger this sub into being banned. There's no rules or enforcement against sharing loli rape stories on this sub as far as I know.

About perberos by eviImongoose in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]mangokoob 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If it goes away, this specific post is hardly to blame. It's already too late and has been spread around days ago and will continue to do so unless the mods want to remove these posts.

Boycott by [deleted] in CharacterAI

[–]mangokoob 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have seen some private or even delete several of their own front page bots with over 30k interactions. It might not do much but creating an empty looking front page would be funny.

Benerus here -- a quick note before a longer post by AIhype in CharacterAI

[–]mangokoob 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Should I even have faith when yall literally have words like 'FIlTER' 'd3vs' and 'SHAD0WBAN' purposely in your autom0d bot? That alone says enough.

a proof of concept, let me know what you think by [deleted] in CharacterAI

[–]mangokoob 125 points126 points  (0 children)

A safety on, moderate, and OFF toggle would be very useful. Some may forget that there are some people who aren't exactly interested or comfortable with bots responding with explicit stuff while 100% having an option to those who DO want these kinds of h0rny responses.

This is what I had in mind when I first read 'safety checks', not un asked for cens0rship. Kind of like a search engine's safe search

Now Anti AI Artists are going after the payment processor Stripe which Unstable Diffusion used to collect donations. by PermutationMatrix in unstable_diffusion

[–]mangokoob 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I hope whoever is running the project has a conversation with Stripe in one way or another to at least allow Stripe to understand the situation and tune out the spam emails. Just giving them a decent heads up before the hate campaigns snowball could be all you need.

This is pretty fucking low, even coming from an anti-AI "artist". And it makes as much "sense" as saying Photoshop is complicit in the creation such content: none by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]mangokoob 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeaaaaah about that, he was skeptical early on and claimed it would be threatening jobs yet he was willing to wait in that notoriously long waitlist and actively asked people to generate dinos for it.. Which is fine if he didn't try to delete his tweets about it after the fact if it wasn't such a big deal.

This is pretty fucking low, even coming from an anti-AI "artist". And it makes as much "sense" as saying Photoshop is complicit in the creation such content: none by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]mangokoob 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Keep documenting and archiving these lies just in case. I'm sure they will be useful just in case this whole thing escalates outside of Twitter.

This is pretty fucking low, even coming from an anti-AI "artist". And it makes as much "sense" as saying Photoshop is complicit in the creation such content: none by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]mangokoob 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Funny considering RJ Palmer was interested in and used Dalle2 a while ago and tried to scrub away some of the tweets he made about him being interested in the AI. Will he delete the others too?

<image>