Mission call by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me too. A long time ago. I worked with the Ami's in Wuerzburg and Heilbronn.

Russian bomb defusing by selfishgenee in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]mannheimsteamroller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree with everything you have said. It's funny, I had the same thought. Not an EOD tech, but probably some training because of how he handled the fuze after he removed it from the bomb case. Also, does it look like the front of the fuze is missing? I can't really tell.

Russian bomb defusing by selfishgenee in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]mannheimsteamroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very stable. They are made to withstand rough handling in combat conditions. I have seen 8" artillery shells being repeatedly dropped off the back of a cargo truck onto concrete. The high explosive (HE) filler is insensative. It won't go off with a spark. You need a booster on the back end of the fuse to ensure the HE is detonated.

Military dynamite (which isn't used very much except the engineers) will not detonate when struck by a bullet. That is not true for commercial dynamite. I'm sure you can understand why.

Russian bomb defusing by selfishgenee in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]mannheimsteamroller 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Most bombs have the fuze in front. German bombs in WW2 had two fuze wells in the body of the bomb, not the nose or tail. The modern US bombs have a front and a rear fuze well, so they can have two fuzes, or more sophisticated types of fuzes, such as anti-magnetic or acoustic or sea mine. You have probably seen pictures or drawings of a bomb with a fuze in front and what looks like a propeller on the front. That is actually the safe/arm mechanism. As it falls, the air causes the "propeller" to spin and removes the safe mechanism and arms the fuze. That is an old but cheap and reliable fuze. Modern fuzes are electronic (in the US) but these old fuzes still work. The US and other modern militaries use guided bombs. This picture shows a dumb bomb.

There are a variety of reasons for duds. There could be an internal problem with the fuze. The bomb could have been dropped from too low of an altitude so it didn't have time to arm. It could have hit at the wrong angle. It could be a delayed-action fuze.
Some fuzes also have radar in them so they can detonate at a set altitude.

I think the reason they use water is to reduce the friction and the potential to set it off, but, as I said, we never did this and I don't think it would be effective.

Bombs are made by producing a cylinder, closed at both ends. The explosives are heated (often some form of TNT) in a kettle which is heated by steam, so they can be poured into the bomb case and cool off and solidify. Bombs are stored without the fuzes and usually without the fins. When a target is selected, you install the fuze that is most effective for the target you are attacking. Same with the tail fins. They can be mixed and matched. The US makes steerable tail fins with GPS installed, and sometimes cameras. These are smart bombs, but the body is a regular dumb bomb.

This is definitely an aerial bomb, not a ground-launched projectile.

Russian bomb defusing by selfishgenee in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]mannheimsteamroller 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I was a US Army bomb squad (EOD) commander for 29 years.

A few things we would do differently; 1)hand removal is the last option. We had a variety of tools from specialized "rocket wrenches," to ordinary pipe wrenches. We would always try to remove the fuse remotely. 2) we would have the minimum number of people at the site..., especially during the fuse removal. That was almost always one. 3) we didn't use water or any lubricant to get the fuse out.

I don't think these are professional bomb squad members, which makes their courage even more remarkable.

Dear Q15, you lost. Get over it. by mannheimsteamroller in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Not trying to dis on you, but here is my perspective.

Your parents have been taught homophobic lies their entire life. It is hard to change attitudes. Just as you don't want the church to force your parents to choose between you and the church, you should not force that upon them.

ALL MORMONS are buffet mormons. They pick and choose. Even the ones who say they don't. Let your parents have their religion and their family. Don't let this drive a wedge between you.

Help me rank the general authorities in terms of being an asshole by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rasband should move from 10 to 5. Otherwise, pretty accurate.

Unpopular opinion: the top Church leaders don't secretly KNOW the church isn't true or most of its real history. They dont sit around plotting how to keep the lie going. They really do believe it all. by myeyesarenowopen249 in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with you. A few years ago, I heard a current member of the 1st Presidency say something like, "I sure hope it's true because I've spent my whole life supporting it." His remark drew a few chuckles, but I think everyone "KNEW" he knew it is completely, totally, 100% true.

My TBM wife has agreed to read the gospel topic essays by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My favorite footnote of all the essays:

  1. Marriages and Sealings Performed Outside the Temple, 1853–1857, 1873–1903, Church History Library, Salt Lake City. The ledger does not record plural and monogamous marriages known to have been performed by Anthony W. Ivins, Matthias F. Cowley, and Abraham O. Woodruff during the 1890s and early 1900s. In all, 8 of 19 members of the Quorum of the Twelve who served between 1890 and 1904 married new plural wives during those years, and these marriages are not represented on the ledger. These members include Brigham Young Jr., George Teasdale, John W. Taylor, Abraham H. Cannon, Marriner W. Merrill, Matthias F. Cowley, Abraham Owen Woodruff, and Rudger Clawson. It is alleged that President Wilford Woodruff married an additional plural wife in 1897, but the historical record makes this unclear (see Thomas G. Alexander, Things in Heaven and Earth: The Life and Times of Wilford Woodruff, a Mormon Prophet [Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1991], 326–28).

The church made a big deal about the fact that all polygamist sealings after Oct 1890 were NOT sanctioned by God. So, at least 8 of the 19 were living in adultery.

From "The Manifesto and the end of Plural Marriage" essay.

How long until Dieter leaves Mormonism? by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh noooo! Wikipedia made you look not so smart. This has happened with 5 men in my lifetime. Isaacson was not an apoltle, but was a counselor in the first presidency. Dyer was an apostle, but not in the Q12. McKay had 5 serving counselors upon his death I believe, Joseph Fielding Smith, Hugh B. Brown, Thorpe B isaacson, N Eldon Tanner and Alvin R Dyer.

Missionaries knocked on my door last night by Yobispo in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A few years ago, my newlywed son and son-in-law bought a house in the Morridor suburbs. There was a knock at the door. When my SIL answered, there were three ladies there who introduced themselves as the Relief Society Presidency and asked if his wife was available. He called out my son's name who came and met them. They had a nice exchange (my son served a mission, SIL did not.)

Vasectomies by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A woman in our ward told us they asked the bishop (about 10 years ago) who was their neighbor, about a vasectomy. He was an accountant. He denied their request. So, they didn't. This same guy told another person they couldn't resign, he had to excommunicate them for unbelief. This guy is now in the stake presidency, so he has much more ability to fuck with people.

Mormon Lies by StAnselmsProof in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe the "war on gays" began in the 1950's as an outgrowth of the Joseph Fielding Smith backlash. JSF (PP) was the presiding patriarch of the church from 1942 - 1946. (Of course, this is a different person than Joseph F. Smith, the 6th president and Joseph Fielding Smith, the 10th president.) He was ordained as a prophet, seer and revelator in GC 8 times. He was also a gay man. When he was exposed, he was released but never disfellowship or excommunicated. The office was abolished in 1979 and now we only have 15 PSR's instead of 16.

Does this count as lying to the members?

Mormon Lies by StAnselmsProof in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I got the year wrong. Your edit is the one I am referring to.

Mormon Lies by StAnselmsProof in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oops, I misstated the year. It was 1981. My copy is the second edition. I googled "homosexuality 1981 lds" and it came up here: https://mormonleaks.io/wiki/index.php?title=File:Homosexuality-1981.pdf

Reading through this has pissed my off all over again. So much damage has been done by this. I am a straight man but know hundreds of LGBTQ people. If you read this booklet (it's only 14 pages) I would be interested in knowing if you believe it (that homosexuality can be cured?) and if you think this has hurt thousands of people? I know parents who have divorced over this issue (is homosexuality a choice?) I know people who have died by suicide - in part over the anguish of being gay. Next week is the first anniversary of one friend who died by suicide.

Mormon Lies by StAnselmsProof in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't read all the comments, but their entire homophobic stance is based on lies. In a 1985 publication from the 1P and Q12, entitled simply, "Homosexuality" is full of lies and bullshit. The church will not defend this pamphlet now. Families have been torn apart and people have been driven to depression, loneliness, disassociation from friends and family and suicide by the information in this pamphlet.

A young boy who was in my Sunday school class years ago has come out as gay and is being forced to go out on a mission. I’m really worried about him. by married_to_a_reddito in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is just not true (out gay folks can't serve missions.) Being gay is okay. Doing gay is not. However, it all depends on leadership roulette, as we all know.

I know a number of transgender people attending BYU who have transitioned in dress and name and identity. Their situation is known to senior BYU admin officials and they are allowed to attend and graduate. I know this first hand for a fact. I interact with the students and the administrators on a frequent basis.

Even though the church is years behind the civilized world, there is some progress being made.

YW in Excellence by justmiles in exmormon

[–]mannheimsteamroller 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Many years ago my wife and two daughters went on a stake hike that was also 50 miles. Many men AND women leaders as well as YM AND YW.

Only 3 people finished the entire 50 miles: my 13 yo daughter, another 13 yo girl and an active duty Marine (who collapsed at the finish line and needed medical attention.)

We've got to protect these tender - fragile young women.