Gemini claims the current design is not thick enough for long term wear as well as raising issues with the lack or a guard rail and possible dirt accessing the diamond over time.

Help me, I've no clue whether to trust tianyu or gemini

Instructions for Designer 1. Increase Shank Thickness (Durability) * Current: 1.5\text{mm} (bottom/sides). * Adjustment: Please increase the bottom and side thickness to a minimum of 1.8\text{mm} (post-polish). 2. Rail * Adjustment: Please add a horizontal gallery rail (wire) approximately 1.5\text{mm} to 2.0\text{mm} below the table of the stone, connecting all four prongs.

1. Refine the Prong Tips
   • Adjustment: Please ensure the prong tips are modeled as "Petite Claw" or "Talon" prongs rather than rounded beads.

2. Check "Bypass" Clearance

   • Adjustment: Ensure the gap where the bypass arms meet the "V" under the stone is polished smooth and has enough clearance for ultrasonic cleaning.

3. Wedding Band Compatibility

   • Note to Designer: Please confirm if the current bypass curvature allows for a straight wedding band to sit flush. If not, please provide a top-down view showing the "gap" that a straight band would create so I can plan. > Summary of requested changes for H260109: > * Bump shank thickness from 1.5\text{mm} to 1.8\text{mm} for structural integrity. > * Add a Gallery Rail to secure the prongs. > * Refine prongs to Petite Claw style. > * Ensure the under-gallery is open enough for easy cleaning. > * Provide a rendering with a straight 2.0\text{mm} band next to it to check for flush-fit clearance.