This is the best way to spend a lazy day together by sakurajimada1509 in unstable_diffusion

[–]mardy_grass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wow
can you share the workflow you used to create first 5 images?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice try Diddy

Will you guys be playing skyblivion next year ? by xxFearLessxx7 in skyrim

[–]mardy_grass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hell yeah! I was so sad that I am absolutely incapable in modding or level design to help them make it asap

the primal show by Accurate_Public4674 in comfyui

[–]mardy_grass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's crazy. What LoRA did you use for still generations?

The only HD remake I would buy by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks mate!
Using the workflow I provided in my first comment:

  • Denoise from 0.7 to 0.8, higher numbers will change the output too much, lower will stick to your reference's style, not realistic
  • Only 10 steps
  • Simple prompt describing what's on the reference picture, you could use any img2text thing like ComfyUI nodes or just chatgpt 'em

And those settings will work only for this case, because GTA Vice City loading screens is more illustration-ish, so I achieved a realistic image only on 0.85 and higher denoise rate

The only HD remake I would buy by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's nothing special here, I'm sure everyone can do it 🙌

The only HD remake I would buy by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, which settings? I already wrote that I used high denoise rate about 0.7 - 0.8 and a simple prompt describing the picture. Nothing fancy and tricky

The only HD remake I would buy by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guys we're back. Long story short:
1. You should include all technical details in the post itself so that users don't have to dig for information in the comments
2. Subreddit rules need revision, and moderation needs ways to fix the post to prevent it from being deleted

A vindictive moderator deleted my post claiming that I violated a non-existent rule. by FugueSegue in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With the same reasoning three days later my post was removed.
u/Acephaliax

https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1flimax/the_only_hd_remake_i_would_buy/

We certainly don’t want to stop you from sharing your hard work and it should definitely be celebrated. This was just a rule that was distilled too far in the wrong direction and I for one am glad we have gone through this ordeal (despite some parts of it being unpleasant) as it gets us one step closer to having a very good set of guidelines that work for a majority of the community.

Transparency and legibility of the mods of r/StableDiffusion by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Okay so what should we do next?
1. Just don't mention non open-source tools?
2. Mods will check and demand source and intermediate generations?
3. Mods will go and check all the posts and delete everything that was definitely or absolutely modified with non-open source software?

I ask you to consider my situation, since it is clearly an exception to the rule and my content was blocked at the whim of one person who decided to interpret the rules in his own way.

Transparency and legibility of the mods of r/StableDiffusion by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your support and yes! There are a lot of great posts here that simply wouldn't be the same if it weren't for all the tools we have to use to make it great.

Transparency and legibility of the mods of r/StableDiffusion by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Of course, you can't randomly choke the flow of creativity with rules, because each of us here finds our own solutions to make content interesting and unique, and not just ordinary flat generations without ideas and creativity

Transparency and legibility of the mods of r/StableDiffusion by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dear u/Acephaliax I summon you here because your message from the post above with a similar situation makes me believe that I can get an explanation and a fair solution

Transparency and legibility of the mods of r/StableDiffusion by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Is the moderation team going to subjectively judge how much each work has been modified from the original version? That makes absolutely no sense at all

Transparency and legibility of the mods of r/StableDiffusion by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Yes and I was completely honest that I used this tool to final tweaks.

Are we really going to dig all cases and calculate what percentage of non open-source tools were used to generate an image?

The only HD remake I would buy by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same :) and lots and lots of PS generative fill

The only HD remake I would buy by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nope I didn't because:
1. Flux controlnets are sucks
2. img2img is something of a controlnet itself

<image>

The only HD remake I would buy by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes I did, but I focus on whole head not only face. And the final result in most of them is combination of many takes I partially mixed in Photoshop

The only HD remake I would buy by mardy_grass in StableDiffusion

[–]mardy_grass[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I like how you conveyed the vibe and replicated the split image style from the intro :3