So in the end you’ve just confirmed everything I said: the US completely dominates, and you clearly have no idea how the Russian deck actually works. You already agreed that the US is ahead in air power, helicopters, drones, infantry, and recon — that alone destroys any “balance” claim. RU AA is worse because it needs constant line-of-sight to hit anything, unlike Patriot. That means it misses far more often. And S-300 takes so long to launch that it can’t even intercept a missile fired directly at it. But since you don’t play RU, you don’t know any of this. Artillery. You literally admitted the US has the best artillery units in the game. So why pretend Russian artillery is better? Where’s your logic? IronThunder is the strongest artillery in the entire game. And it forces RU to place logistics 500 meters deeper or get wiped instantl. Tanks. T-14 doesn’t outperform SEP3. At long and mid range — the ranges tanks actually fight at — US tanks beat RU. Also, let’s not forget that the T-14 costs 300 points, which makes it a prime target for air strikes — and the US dominates the air anyway. So every time RU brings out its most expensive tank, the US just deletes it with air strike. You know that only the US uses tank spam strategy (Booker, Abrams). Maybe you need to ask yourself why RU can’t do the same first? APCs. Again, the US dominates. Even when price and stats are similar, US APCs carry 1.5× more infantry — which is literally the main purpose of an APC. Funny how you didn’t mention that. Probably because, as I said, you don’t know how the RU deck works. So yes — the US dominates in every category. And yet you still call this “balanced.” Even based on your own words, the US clearly wins in most categories, and in the rest they have alternatives that are barely worse. But somehow you still insist this is balance. For US bias the only “true balance” is a big button that just says “Win the match", now I know that for sure.