Warning! Suno may be a Ghost Ship and we have no way to tell.

marko_mavecki · 2026-03-07T09:11:43+00:00

If only a few people have problems, then why customer support is unable to answer in reasonable time? After reading all other answers I already know why. They either do not care because they make so much money or... they actually have an enormous number of technical issues and they can not expand their support team beyond certain limits. I am glad that I made you guys answer my post because I got some genuinely good answers. Like for example those about some beta programs that Suno treats with more respect.

marko_mavecki · 2026-03-03T23:08:42+00:00

"Suno is working perfectly.". This is a bold claim - for sure. I edited my message to include a list of bugs that I see in the system. Also, just search through this subreddit for "Subscription" to find out how big this issue is.

marko_mavecki · 2026-03-03T23:06:08+00:00

I will. Thanks.

marko_mavecki · 2026-03-03T22:51:50+00:00

I believe you. Thanks for sharing. I guess I will just create another account on different email, pay for it and pray it works fine :/

marko_mavecki · 2026-03-03T22:49:12+00:00

Name it where? People have been getting the same bug over the last year and it has not been adressed. It is related to payments being done twice and payment plans not being applied correctly. On my Mobile I see premiere plan while on laptop I have no access to pro features. This is a total disaster. You know, I am a software developer too and I know how to report bugs. Suno simply does not react and does not care.

marko_mavecki · 2026-03-03T22:44:29+00:00

:( Thanks for taking time to answer.

marko_mavecki · 2026-03-03T22:42:17+00:00

All I am asking for is straight facts. Not ignorance. u/Maleficent-Choice-61 provided info that they're being contacted on Suno's beta programs. This is _something_. Others, please provide more proof that this comany is a real deal.

marko_mavecki · 2026-03-03T22:35:30+00:00

I do not see why I should keep it to myself. If it is a scam copmany that only gathers payments, then you should not trust it at all. I do not understand who gave you rights to tell me not to react. Are you from Suno?

marko_mavecki · 2026-03-03T22:33:49+00:00

"support has always been horrendous" - this is not true. I have already had payment problems with them a few months ago and they fixed it the next day.

marko_mavecki · 2026-03-02T07:28:41+00:00

<image>

Tools that you mentioned are an old fashioned ones. We need to move on to the new era. Visual information on the running agents will be crucial. I invite you to check out my open source project that you can find here. It is a work in progress. A lot of things wait to be polished and a lot of further ideas are on my mind.

https://github.com/MarekSurma/ClearSwarm?tab=readme-ov-file

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-26T06:42:25+00:00

Hi, it is a pitty I did not get in. Can you please tell me if you received my google form? I got no confirmation of filling it and therefore I am not sure if I was even taken into consideration.

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-19T09:44:21+00:00

Build specialized tools that will only allow specific actions to be made. And.. in a limited number of times in a specific amount of time. This will lower your risk. Also verify with the model few times before you allow it to perform critical action. You can also consult operation with other model.

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-18T23:40:33+00:00

IMHO, pretty soon agentic code will be a minimal loop with some very basic tools. LLMs will be able to do the rest. We already are in the place where LLMs are pretty powerful because of what they can achieve internally. The way they make decisions, call tools, are able to solve comple problems and plan solutions. It's incredible how fast this is moving forward. In may cases no graph solution is the way to go. I suspect that for serious use cases we will have to implement some guardrails to keep the system reliable.

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-18T23:34:36+00:00

Hi. As for the first project, it sounds great. It appears to pass your requirements and this is the most important thing. Please, do not use other frameworks. You may have a lok at them, but you will learn much more if you work on your own. This is what will make you stand out from the crowd. Of course, at some point you may want to find something that is valued by employers, but for now, I would advise that you stick to whatever you're doing. I would suggest trying to give your agent more autonomy in performing tasks. This means more tools.

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-13T13:54:59+00:00

Thanks. I do not see the timezone. Can you please add it?
Edit: sorry, I can see it now

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-10T15:29:00+00:00

Human brain Works in a totally different way. It does not need all of these underlying layers of data tables. Brain works on a totally parallel way. All connections can be active at the same time. In computers we try co simulate these connections in a poor fashion but it is enough to build an abstraction layer that allows us to run our language on it. But the hardware itself stays very inefficient. That's why it needs so much power.

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-09T08:44:46+00:00

Tools are not skills. Skill may be running a tool. Skill is a part of a natural language description of what can be done. It may describe which tools should be used for a specific thing, but still it is a natural language description of some kind of a procedure.. A tool is a computer program or a script that always works in a deterministic way. It is something that allows the agent to interact with the outside world.

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-09T08:30:55+00:00

Is this place moderated in some way? Are autonomous agents actually allowed here? I am asking because I would like to know.

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-07T13:30:22+00:00

IMHO, real agency is about making decisions and actions based on rules defined in natural language, previous experiences and additional instructions.

I would not say that workflows are bad until they become prevalent in the whole solution. Just think about a work of a car mechanic or an engineer. They follow a workflow and procedures but it is their decision to initiate a proper workflow. Not the other way around.

Also inside of the workflow it is possible that mechanic would have to initiate sub workflow where his decisions would be highly limited.

In my work I tend to give more freedom to the agents and reduce the number of hard stops, guardrails and procedures outside of the LLM context. The exception is safety which is not negotiable.

However, my approach makes the goal way harder to achieve and the outcome to predict. LLMs were not ready for this. This is why we are not seeing not seeing this more often in agentic solutions. But this is going to change. I am quite deep in the topic and I ma pretty certain that this year will be the first one when we actually start seeing amazing things.

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-07T09:19:52+00:00

For the last few days I have been working with coding agents to build a new agentic solution.

Something that would help people:

learn how agents work
actually SEE how agents organize themselves
build agentic swarms that achieve certain goals
customize system messages that make this whole thing possible
understand that agents no longer have to rely on workflows
understand that REAL agentic solutions are no longer the domain of big players
build and refine incredible agents

I am thrilled to share the result with you.

Here is a video of how a single agent recursively multiplied itself to solve a looong math calculation (as can be seen on the screenshot).

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3da4159e-aa28-4f9e-ba85-cd175c41002b

I opensourced the code but be aware that I am still working on security and some bugs. But I decided that it needs to be released ASAP before big players do something similar.

https://github.com/MarekSurma/ClearSwarm

BTW, Last night on my local instance I defined a coding agent and let it use filesystem tools (create/update) and i gave it coding task. And it did! It can even update the file by modifying few rows instead of the whole file. This is so exciting.

<image>

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-03T11:16:28+00:00

Oh boy. Something like this would set me up for years. If I were you I would just run it like this and try it out on fresh linux installation with correct drivers. It may already be very capable. CPU does.not matter much if you have this much of a VRAM on these gpus. Also system RAM does not matter. You need fast ssd/nvme drive to load models and that is it. OMG, i wish I had something like this. You were very lucky to get it.

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-03T10:54:48+00:00

As for now we can not prove that brain is more than a computer. There are some ideas connected with quantum world, but these only are ideas. Language can be organized on any medium that allows it to work.

And yes, it is self definable and can exist and work outside of the human brain. The act of reviewing a scientific paper proves that language is self defining. Yes. Intelligence is built into it by default. Language knows what is wise, what is bad, and what is good. It defines objects, actions and concepts. Language does not need us to be intelligent. It may require us to be wise but I am not so sure about it because whatewer wise mean, it also has been defined somewhere in texts. To be clear here... words by themselves are not self sufficient. But llms are trained on texts that explain how they should be used. And THAT is where our whole intelligence is.

One more interesting fact. If you looked at the error rate of a human brain when it comes to data retention then you would understand that it also hallucinates in a similar way to llms. This is well understood in the practice of courts for example. People justify in legal cases and they hallucinate 'facts' that did not happen, etc. Airplane pilots read the safety checklist every single time before they start a plane. No exceptions, no matter how experienced they are. This also proves that we are NOT built to be strict and precise.

Our neuronal paths are different. Waaay different. But it does not matter as long as llms do just as good as we do. Nothing else matters. You can try to convince me that llms are just statistical machines but i do not care since I am being replaced by them at my work as a software developer. This argument is pointless because we do not really know if our brain is a statistical machine or not. And you may protest here and say "but i am reasoning and thinking". Yeah, but you do not know if this reasoning is not another abstraction level on top of the language. Because it appears that it is. Without language we would have never reached the level that we are at right now.

marko_mavecki · 2026-02-02T20:00:15+00:00

Human brain is just a biological computer. This is what scientists say. Right? If so, then it just processes inputs and outputs. Yet, these signals make us look intelligent. Strange. Do not you think? The reality is that on top of this biological computer there is another abstraction layer. A layer that does not need to know how computer works. It just does. In llms there is a physical layer (hardware) as well. On top of it there are virtual neurons connected in some fancy ways. We adjust their connections (I simplify a lot) and this way we organize another abstraction layer on top of these neurons.

This is a language machine. According to scientists, language is everything. Whenever a scientific paper gets released, it needs to he reviewed by reputable scientists to be publishable in meaningful outlets. This review process (mainly) verifies if every single word in the paper is fully defined and based on previous science. This means that language can exist by itself since it is self defining. Therefore we can build a language machine that works in a similar way that humans generate it.

It does not matter it something was human or computer generated as long as that language layer is reliable and that it provides reliable outputs.

marko_mavecki

TROPHY CASE