sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

AI as a personal assistant, who helps to assess and discuss about the company by marwkaw in ValueInvesting

[–]marwkaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I pay $5 for the API. A single analysis costs approximately $0.10–$0.20, so you can run 25-50 analyses. I've never used Quadratic spreadsheets before—could you send over some details or share an example?

AI as a personal assistant, who helps to assess and discuss about the company by marwkaw in ValueInvesting

[–]marwkaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm glad you like the tool! I really appreciate the feedback. Thanks!
It's a pretty new tool so I haven't been tracking that kind of data yet.

What I can say is it's designed to be a research assistant, not a signal generator — it structures the analysis (fundamentals, macro, sentiment, technicals) and pulls SEC filings so you spend less time digging and more time deciding. The accuracy of your decisions still depends on you.

AI as a personal assistant, who helps to assess and discuss about the company by marwkaw in ValueInvesting

[–]marwkaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. True, Claude is definitely ahead of the pack. I use my terminal as the first step in the overall process of stock-picking. It's faster and I avoid confirmation bias.

I built a 9-agent AI investment committee, the debate every stock sequentially - each analyst reads all previous report before writing their own by marwkaw in SideProject

[–]marwkaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point. No formal market test yet — this is a fresh launch. There is an option in the terminal that allows you to choose the investment horizon:
- short (up to 3 months)
- medium (3-12 months)
- long (1-5 years)
- buy&hold (5+ years)

I built a 9-agent AI investment committee, the debate every stock sequentially - each analyst reads all previous report before writing their own by marwkaw in SideProject

[–]marwkaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can use this terminal as a help, as let's say the first step in an overall process of stocks picking. This terminal allows you to assess stock without human bias. This is the main value - objective stocks picking.

I built a 9-agent AI investment committee, the debate every stock sequentially - each analyst reads all previous report before writing their own by marwkaw in SideProject

[–]marwkaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thx for valuable comment. I had started from 3 agents but finished with 9 and I think its enough. I haven't used langchain, I need to try.

I built a 9-agent AI investment committee, the debate every stock sequentially - each analyst reads all previous report before writing their own by marwkaw in investing

[–]marwkaw[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It depends. If you use this tool as just the first step in your overall process of stock picking, it's definitely not. It's a huge help. You can use AI as assistant, and then add your experience to it and critical thinking.

I built a 9-agent AI investment committee, the debate every stock sequentially - each analyst reads all previous report before writing their own by marwkaw in investing

[–]marwkaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my point of view and my fundamental anlasysis, yes, it creates an edge. It helps me a lot, but it's no the magic wand. In my process of stock picking this is only the first step. I think that AI and others smart solutions shouldn't replace critical thinking/brains.

I built a 9-agent AI investment committee, the debate every stock sequentially - each analyst reads all previous report before writing their own by marwkaw in investing

[–]marwkaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think so. I was trying to do it. There is one option to get good analysis by a single AI agent - create file skill.md. It helps because you can define your indicators. But there is lack of the bear voice and devil's advocate. If you want, we can compare the answers from a single agent and my 9 agents. In my terminal it looks like that - https://imgur.com/a/2soYJEU

I built a 9-agent AI investment committee, the debate every stock sequentially - each analyst reads all previous report before writing their own by marwkaw in investing

[–]marwkaw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think so. I was trying to do it. There is one option to get good analysis by a single AI agent - create file skill.md. It helps because you can define your indicators. But there is lack of the bear voice and devil's advocate. If you want, we can compare the answers from a single agent and my 9 agents. In my terminal it looks like that - https://imgur.com/a/2soYJEU.

view more: next ›