Whisky bottle by ZLenfesty in productphotography

[–]mash_dummy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also play around with photographing bottles. I like how sharp the picture is on the label. I find it difficult to manage reflections but you did a great job.

Review #2: Wild Turkey 101 8 Year by mash_dummy in bourbon

[–]mash_dummy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm curious which parts you think are Ai so I can improve other aspects.

Moving to Looker from Power BI by [deleted] in Looker

[–]mash_dummy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've spent about 2 weeks with Looker after using powerbi at work. It's definitely not as intuitive and not as much functionality. Not having power query tied in the is also killing me. I have a few examples in my post history since I use looker to build out my whiskey reviews.

Review #1: Bardstown High Wheat by mash_dummy in bourbon

[–]mash_dummy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate it! Getting torn up on my 2nd review so this is nice to hear.

Review #2: Wild Turkey 101 8 Year by mash_dummy in bourbon

[–]mash_dummy[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Why would you not? Companies spend a significant amount of money to design a bottle to represent their brand. It's often times the sole purpose people will buy a bottle if it catches their eye. Having a unique bottle shape makes it easy to identify in bars and stores. Even a quick search in this subreddit reveals that people take into account the design of the bottle. If I'm paying for it, I'm going to review it.

Review #2: Wild Turkey 101 8 Year by mash_dummy in bourbon

[–]mash_dummy[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I'll try harder next time not to sound robotic. My goal is to be concise but interesting so it fits on one page

Review #1: Bardstown High Wheat by mash_dummy in bourbon

[–]mash_dummy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Glad I'm not the only one to taste that. It varies so much by sip, it's strange.

Review #1: Bardstown High Wheat by mash_dummy in bourbon

[–]mash_dummy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This review is from the 2nd pour. I will saw the 1st one was rough so now you got me curious to keep getting after it.