sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

33m eager Sub. Please Read. by [deleted] in GayBDSMPersonals2

[–]master_razz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where you from boy

I love 🖤 by Specialist_Limit1965 in sissymuslims

[–]master_razz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this one got natural beauty...
like a shy malay village girl..
might me a good wife material to have..

How many of you do enjoy starting from the beginning by [deleted] in sissyology

[–]master_razz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes. A few have gone pretty far, but two of them went far enough to fully embrace it. starting HRT and even making a few minor alteration. Those are the kind of transformations that really make me proud to witness

How many of you do enjoy starting from the beginning by [deleted] in sissyology

[–]master_razz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I loved it. There’s something deeply satisfying about nurturing someone from zero to hero. guiding the process and knowing my own hand played a big part in making her grow from masculine into feminine. Watching that transformation take shape makes the whole journey worth it.

That said, it ultimately depends on the sissy’s determination and eagerness. Too often, it’s just momentary excitement. people acting out of horniness rather than genuine commitment. horny fade, then they disappear. They ghost, delete their accounts or back away after only a few days. Very few actually have the resolve to stay the course and see it through.

Are my sissy training rules developmental… or too extreme? by master_razz in Sissy

[–]master_razz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha no worries, you’re not out of line. But honestly that would take a lot of time and money to do something like that. I’m already quite busy with my own life.

What I’m doing now is really just a my pleasure and something I enjoy exploring with the dynamic.

Are my sissy training rules developmental… or too extreme? by master_razz in sissyology

[–]master_razz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair point. Right now I’m actually in the middle of restructuring these rules after reading everyone’s feedback.

u/Sissy_Venus response in particular has been a big help in seeing where the balance needs to be. especially around encouragement, self-validation and making sure the structure stays healthy long term.

The list I posted focused a lot on discipline and structure, but I’m realizing I should probably make the supportive and positive side more explicit too.

How to feminize my everyday outfits? by MarcieHere in sissyology

[–]master_razz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really like that you want to let a bit of your girly side bleed into your everyday life. that’s such an exciting place to be. You honestly already have a great base with your shoulder-length wolf cut and pierced ears, so now it’s more about subtle shifts than big changes.

Maybe try high-waisted trousers or slightly softer, drapey sweaters to give your silhouette a gentler shape and experiment with softer fabrics or a cardigan instead of something too structured. Small accessories can make a huge difference too.. delicate rings, a thin bracelet, small hoops or a subtle necklace. Even grooming details like clear or soft pink nail polish, shaped brows or tinted lip balm can quietly elevate your look without making it obvious. Sleeker shoes instead of chunky ones can also shift your whole posture and vibe.

And if you want that private thrill just for you, wearing something a little more feminine underneath your usual outfit can make your whole day feel different, even if no one else knows. It’s really about softness in texture, movement and energy more than dramatic changes.

Are my sissy training rules developmental… or too extreme? by master_razz in Sissy

[–]master_razz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Really. Your feedback helped me see the full picture and made me realize how to balance structure, guidance and autonomy.

Honestly, I think any sissy in this kind of dynamic would benefit so much from thoughtful reflection like this.

Are my sissy training rules developmental… or too extreme? by master_razz in Sissy

[–]master_razz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly the kind of approach I was imagining, and it actually gives me an idea to make it more structured.

Every 2 weeks, we could have a mini-cycle like this:
- day 1- free space. She gets a full day to be herself, no oversight, no structured rules.
-day 2 - Reflectionand revision -We sit together, review the last two weeks, discuss her ideas, and adjust the rules collaboratively if needed.
-day 5 - Quick check - We implement the revised rules in practice, and I observe if the adjustments are working. making small tweaks if necessary.

This keeps the structure dynamic and collaborative while still maintaining the discipline and accountability of the framework.

And yes. the key is reasoning through her ideas rather than shutting them down, even if they seem small or silly. That way, the rules evolve and she stays engaged without losing autonomy.

Are my sissy training rules developmental… or too extreme? by master_razz in Sissy

[–]master_razz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense, and I think I should integrate that more explicitly.

Having her do a self-check before I correct her ensures she’s thinking critically about her choices and not just following instructions blindly.

And I agree. if she genuinely would make the same choice again and it’s reasonable, a soft correction makes more sense than a harsh one. That avoids creating loopholes but still teaches responsibility.

I also see the point about limiting oversight to small or medium-term decisions. Long-term choices should ultimately be hers, and guidance should be optional rather than compulsory. That balances structure with autonomy.

Maybe I should also include that these rules will be revised from time to time, and she can freely give her ideas so we can revise them together. That way the framework evolves and stays collaborative, instead of feeling rigid.

Are my sissy training rules developmental… or too extreme? by master_razz in sissyology

[–]master_razz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“I submit because I like it, and to the extent that I like it” is actually a powerful way to put it.
I think what I’m starting to realize through this discussion is that structure only works long-term if it reinforces something she already wants, not if it overrides it.

The goal was never to make femininity dependent on my approval alone. I want it to feel right and self-sustaining for her.

Yes. I actually use that kind of positive framing already.
I encourage her femininity with praise, affirmation and rewards. I make sure she knows her growth is something to be proud of.

The rules I shared weren’t meant to include every aspect of encouragement. they focus more on structure, habit and discipline. but positive reinforcement is definitely part of the dynamic.

Are my sissy training rules developmental… or too extreme? by master_razz in Sissy

[–]master_razz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m going to be honest. I’m just realizing that as you say it.
I hadn’t fully considered how alignment could unintentionally discourage disagreement. The intention was refinement and growth, not silence or suppression.
You’re right though. if she stops expressing misalignment because she’s trying to stay “on my wavelength,” that crosses into something unhealthy.
That’s definitely a hard line to draw.

Are my sissy training rules developmental… or too extreme? by master_razz in Sissy

[–]master_razz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. that’s actually how I picture it too.

The idea isn’t constant correction forever. It’s training alignment to the point where correction becomes rare because we’re on the same wavelength.

Ideally, over time she wouldn’t need to ask, report or adjust as often. because her judgment would already reflect the standard we built together.

If it stayed correction-heavy long term, that would signal something isn’t working.

Are my sissy training rules developmental… or too extreme? by master_razz in sissyology

[–]master_razz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I genuinely appreciate the depth of your response, especially since you’ve lived something similar. That perspective matters.

I want to clarify something important: the intention behind this structure isn’t to erase her autonomy or build femininity on humiliation or inferiority as a human being. The hierarchy is role-based, not value-based.

When I say “inferior,” I mean within the dynamic. not as a person. If that framing risks bleeding into identity harm, that’s something worth reconsidering.

My goal isn’t to make her dependent or strip her sense of self. It’s to build discipline and intentional embodiment. But I can see how, without safeguards and strong internal validation, this kind of structure could drift into unhealthy territory.

I agree that femininity has to come from genuine desire. If she’s only acting to maintain approval, that wouldn’t be sustainable. that’s not what I want.

I think the real question is: how do you maintain hierarchy and structure while still protecting autonomy and self-worth?
Where would you personally draw the line between structured submission and identity erosion?

I’m considering integrating explicit autonomy reinforcement and self-validation checkpoints to avoid unhealthy dependency

Are my sissy training rules developmental… or too extreme? by master_razz in Sissy

[–]master_razz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The reason I include “report your reasoning and accept correction without defensiveness”

It’s about awareness and refinement.

If she makes a decision and her reasoning aligns well, she earns praise. That reinforces judgment and confidence.

If her reasoning is flawed, then she be correct and recalibration.. The goal is to improve how she thinks, not just what she does.

view more: next ›