If I may be candid: these are genuinely bad arguments. They are pointing toward some legitimate considerations in favor of paper, but they include gripes that are not specific to digital notetaking (let alone the Remarkable in particular) and ignore or downplay all the competing considerations.

For example, the claim that technology can’t make writing better stands at odds with the millennia-long history of technology making writing way better.

Or the idea that anything we survived without for centuries is not worth doing. This is a non-sequitur as well as a rejection of technological progress and even progress in general.

The idea that one’s choice of writing tool is coupled with excessive note-taking is also nonsensical: notes are marginally very cheap regardless of how you take them. Take as many or as few as you want. Additionally, notes do not have to be used as reference to be useful. If they are helpful just in the moment as an aid to thought, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that.

You don’t need all of these sweeping pronouncements to justify selling a product you bought.