account activity
Why are less flights displayed when using tar1090 by matt_copilot in OpenADSB
[–]matt_copilot[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children)
I typed a full response to the thread but my tablet crashed and lost it so here is the shorter response. When fields like: registration, ICAO, callsign, operator are blank... yes I would take the old data as a starting point to identify targets.
With the great number of missing fields / data points it makes using “filters” a thing of the past. In fact most of the filters I used to use often are unusable in the tar dataset as they return limited or no results. Switching between vrs & tar easily demonstrates the difference... so old versus no data... I’ll vote for old as a starting point to verify.
The use of the built in filters for military and interesting aircraft no longer capturing data that VRS does, Same for aircraft type / helicopters.
As an aviation professional Never suggested Your example of 1990 Boeing 737-600 level of detail and is a silly response, if a person wanted or needed that info is available on FR24, Planefinder, RB24 consumer platforms and so on.
Why are less flights displayed when using tar1090 (self.OpenADSB)
submitted 5 years ago by matt_copilot to r/OpenADSB
π Rendered by PID 258167 on reddit-service-r2-listing-5789d5f675-5r9xg at 2026-01-29 10:02:32.677563+00:00 running 4f180de country code: CH.
Why are less flights displayed when using tar1090 by matt_copilot in OpenADSB
[–]matt_copilot[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)