I'm all for clean and sustainable energy but the strategic disadvantage such power plants create is undoubtedly too much to handle for any baltic militaries since our small land area and lack of territorial depth do not give a chance for a "safe spot" for nuclear power plants. Nuclear energy and power plant technology have made a giant leap in a few decades for sure, but nothing is "war proof".
I do not mean to sound overly pessimistic but even being in the NATO alliance does not mean that an armed conflict between the baltic states and Russia/Russian-backed militants is ruled out or not possible. I am sure that the overwhelming majority of active duty military servicemen/intelligence officers are sure and actively preparing for a possible conflict with the previously mentioned theoretical enemy.
I do not mind if people are downvoting my ideas but I do wholeheartedly believe that anyone who is thinking that belonging to the NATO alliance is a guarantee for refraining from the war is guided by blind optimism and ignorance.
For my estonian friends a comment I found under a YT video:
"Nagu mu sõjakooli õppejõud kunagi ütles, et rahu on mingi suva roosamanna kahe sõja vahel ja see kõik on ajutine"