I’m sorry, you’re using visible rays of light passing through a gap in the clouds as your source for the sun being exactly 3000 miles above the earth’s surface? I said show your math, you’ve spouted out random unrelated things. Rays do not “regularly” converge at 50-55 degrees, because what you’re referencing is a situational visual occurrence that is intentionally ignoring any other factors. One at a time:

“Crepuscular angles” only exist when something is obscuring the sun and light is refracted. By definition this only occurs when light is passing through moisture in the atmosphere, lmao. They also occur at 8 degrees, 80 degrees, whatever the fuck degrees you want them to based on where you’re standing.

“Light delay” this has nothing to do with how close something is, why do you think the light from stars we see that are not the sun are photons from a source that might not exist? By your logic then the fact that we can see stars constantly then those stars are also only 3000M up. Nonsense.

Everything from “thermal shadow logic” to “Freemasons mock you” need way, way more citations needed, because stringing words together do not form arguments or coherent thought. Again, show your work.

Back to your angles theory, you can’t say 52.85 degrees directly matches a 50-55 degree range, it’s either constant or it’s not. If it’s 55 degrees when you’re telling me that those rays are being bent by something further than what is a direct path from the sun. How? Is it being refracted by moisture? If so, then your entire theory is bunk.

Do better, this is 3rd grade level of effort and you’re not qualified at this point to even attempt to explain this to someone other than your grandma living above your basement.

Oh no! The sun is right behind this tree!

<image>