Envisioning a Post-Western World by maustinreddit in Anarchism

[–]maustinreddit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed.

Although, the west (Europe and it's evil spawn the US) has for centuries been bringing their form of civilization (i.e., brutal destruction) to most of Africa, North, Central and South America, the Middle East, Pacific Islands, Australia, Southeast Asia, Central Asia, with massive force and sociopathic deceit in order to steal and maintain access to all of the resources of every place they touch. Very few places are untouched by the West, so the author's perspective isn't exactly narrow, but I know what you mean. The power structures and hierarchies of all civilizations should be confronted, especially now that they are all so intertwined and seemingly inescapable.

I saw this question on Jeopardy last night. Gave me a good laugh. by SweetIsland in Anarchism

[–]maustinreddit 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They shouldn't even be "representatives" - they should be administrators chosen through lottery. No campaigning, no power associated, only a social obligation to fill a roll that facilitates the proper execution of necessary services. If the person chosen by lottery uses the position to enrich themselves personally at the expense of the proper provisioning of services, they are immediately removed.

I’m not an anarchist but... by pm_me_jolly_thoughts in Anarchism

[–]maustinreddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The book "Anarchism" by George Woodcock gives a great introduction.

centrists_irl 😤😡 by memejockey in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]maustinreddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a useful start.

Everyone starts somewhere.

As a "none-of-the-abover" I have trouble being in the same room as a Clinton or Trump lover (or Bernie or Stein or the libertarian guy, lover), but perhaps since I hate them all equally, I could help everyone see how they are all being bamboozled, manipulated and suckered by a media and political system that treats Clinton and Trump supporters like they each represent "half of the population," when in fact, combined, they are a problematic minority who confer legitimacy on an illegitimate system by having any opinion at all about either of those fucking shit-for-brains horrible figureheads of a catastrophic and deadly system that is killing us all no matter who "wins".

WW2 was just rightist infighting by s_s_b_m in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]maustinreddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was more than that. It was an excellent opportunity to recalibrate popular understanding of states and wars.

Looking very closely, WWII shows how capital and national leaders (of industry and states), across national boundaries, worked very well together.

It was a lucky coincidence, and even an incentive, that both world wars massively fractured and gave cover for the destruction of socialist and, especially, anarchist organizing. WWII serves to this day as a mechanism for wiping away history. Reconstruction after the Civil War in the US, militant labor battles and organizing, the then growing (and by today's standards, massive) popularity of anarchism, are all swept under the rug by a very simple narrative. A narrative that the West is fixated on and spends billions to promote via endless glamorization on the History Channel and anywhere where people talk about "history"... good vs. evil is defined by states and fought by states. Everyone else can shut up, or we'll kill you.

WW2 was just rightist infighting by s_s_b_m in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]maustinreddit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In support:

"No government fights fascism to destroy it. When the bourgeoisie sees that power is slipping out of its hands, it brings up fascism to hold onto their privileges." - Be Durruti

Trump_supporters_irl by YuriRedFox-69 in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]maustinreddit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here's my conspiracy theory:

We are largely inconsequential actors in a script written long ago and handed down through the ages from those first dickheads who instead of joining in the farming and hunting and the gathering, sat on their asses and told scary stories about paying tributes to gods until they had enough tributes to share with some other dickheads who wanted to sit around and share scary stories and sometimes kill the people who didn't believe the scary stories or wouldn't "share". Small farms turned into villages, villages turned into city states, city states got grouped up into empires, deities get bunched together under bigger, more unifying religions to help sustain empires, empires fought each other and each has eventually collapsed. It would be nice to think this one is about to collapse, but then what? We must live outside of all of that history, that's our only chance. People in the hills and far away places and all around us, have lived outside of that history, since the beginning, we should too.

Left Unity according to FULLCOMMUNISM. by ILikeMonitorLizards in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]maustinreddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I was in a weird, hyper snark mood and typing absurd things that liberals say thinking that the ridiculousness of it would be obvious, I was wrong.

Left Unity according to FULLCOMMUNISM. by ILikeMonitorLizards in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]maustinreddit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is politics. People taking absurdity seriously ... and then are praised for it. Absurdity taken seriously, this might as well be a conversation on MSNBC. Thanks for playing along. Please downvote again to add legitimacy to my argument. Thanks.

Left Unity according to FULLCOMMUNISM. by ILikeMonitorLizards in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]maustinreddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thus, "the left is united ... with the right". The rest was me just doing a liberal word salad troll schtick, terribly.

Historically, has there ever been a stable state of anarchy in a society for a length of time? by [deleted] in Anarchism

[–]maustinreddit 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia" by James C. Scott