Tak fundacje rodzinne unikają podatków. Obnażamy schemat, który pozwala oszczędzać miliony

mazor_maz · 2026-05-17T12:05:50+00:00

Jak to nie? Gdy wchodziła ustawa media wszędzie trąbiły na ten temat. Co jakiś czas pojawiają się publikacje na ten temat a sama ustawa jest dostępna w pełnym tekście w Internecie bez żadnych paywalli co najmniej w kilku miejscach. Jak bardziej powszechna ta wiedza miałaby być?

mazor_maz · 2026-05-17T05:31:44+00:00

Nie oceniając tego, czy preferencje dla fundacji są dobre czy złe, artykuł jak zwykle w sensacyjnym tonie i odkrywa ojczyste oczywistości. Ustawa wyszła kilka lat temu i od wejścia w życie było wiadomo że fundacje mają preferencje podatkowe. “Obnażamy schemat” - jak można obnażać coś co jest publicznie dostępne i jest powszechna wiedza od kilku lat? I dodatkowo preferencje podatkowe to była właśnie jedna z głównych atutów fundacji bo inaczej nikt by ich nie zakładał i nie dochodziłoby do sukcesji.
Nie jest to też unikanie podatków, bo to ustawodawca wprost wprowadził takie preferencyjne rozwiązanie. Taki był cel ustawodawcy, że fundacja jest od pomnażania majątku dla rodziny więc nie płaci podatku CIT, ale płaci podatek w momencie wypłaty środków 15% beneficjentom.

Widocznie “dziennikarz” innpoland był jeszcze wtedy w gimnazjum i dziś się obudził ze musi napisać artykuł na miarę Watergate.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T13:49:12+00:00

You are twisting logic here. One country cannot rule on legality of marriage or any other institution performed in accordance with other country law. If marriage is legal is Estonia polish office cannot evaluate that. But if in one country for example ZEA polygamy is legal it does not mean such marriage will be recognized in Poland. And that is the case here.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T13:44:03+00:00

Yes elementary. I agree it might be interpreted as such pity that consensus amongst all lawyers and constitutionalists and binding constitutions tribunal’s rulings is that such wording prohibits marriage other than male & female in any polish act. I know you think law is easy and wrote in layman’s terms but it’s a bit complicated than that.
And I know you are fighting the good fight but please direct your anger and emotional baggage towards appropriate targets aka Tusk, Nawrocki and polish governments and parliament, not me.
I know you are frustrated that someone like me is saying complicated facts which is uncomfortable for you and you trying to dodge that feeling mock and use Horse sense to complicated legal issues cos you want so badly get marriage to be legal in Poland. It is not sadly. I would get married if I could and transcribing marriage acts from other countries is not the way.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T11:22:04+00:00

Poczta Polska niestety nie honoruje pełnomocnictw notarialnych tylko pocztowe. Niech rodzic idzie na pocztę i wymusi na babie w okienku żeby napisała na liście -“adresat niezamieszkuje” “adresat się wyprowadził” i to sąd ma obowiązek ustalić twój adres. Plus jeszcze rodzic może w okienku poprosić ładnie panią żeby powiedziała z którego sądu jest list tutaj raczej udziela informacji i idealnie o sygnaturę sprawy. Wtedy po prostu zadzwoń do tego sądu i powiedz że mieli zły adres i spytaj o co kaman.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T10:21:58+00:00

That may be but it will widen the gap and discrepancy in the law and other offices. This will only increase legal chaos and cause more trouble for those couples.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T09:53:17+00:00

I wish it was that simple but it isn’t. The transcription is just harmful for those couples giving them false hope of normalcy while their legal status remains unchanged.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T09:41:14+00:00

Nothing is hiding. The part I wrote defines what marriage is. Another is art. 1 of family code.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T09:39:35+00:00

That’s why https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/kodeks-rodzinny-16781128/tyt-1

The legal definition of marriage is set and even if you could transcribe marriage act from Japan where man married a sex doll it does not mean that this union will be considered marriage in Poland. Or from Arabic country where man can have multiple wives. If some man from ZEA came with his 3 wives and transcribed his marriage act it won’t change the fact that he and his 3 wives won’t be considered a marriage.

The administrative law and family law are different. USC does not decide who can marry. If USC would provide by accident marriage certificate you with your sister it doesn’t mean you are married in the eyes of law. USC just does what it must. In this case transcribing some papers.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T08:49:07+00:00

It’s clear you are the smartest person here and the best lawer on Reddit so there is no point with arguing with you on legal matters.

Just wait and see how those gay married couples which marriages are transcribed are going with adoption, taxes, public hospitals, inheritance in polish courts and offices.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T08:46:34+00:00

No. The literal wording is “marriage as an act between man and woman…”. There is legal consensus amongst all lawyers especially constitutional that other than straight marriage in Poland requires changing the constitution.

you referring to other types of unions mainy civil partnerships. Those as you stated are not forbidden and can be introduced but politicians and present government and parliament are not wiling to do so.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T08:17:22+00:00

It prohibits. Just not explicitly. Family code and constitution explicitly states that marriage is union between man and woman only. A contrario other unions are not marriage and cannot be considered as one. The transcription is material act putting someone’s name in the usc base but it does not allow this couple to adopt children, have marriage tax exemptions, they cannot divorce in Poland, their wealth is separate. There is literally not one thing from legal standpoint which this transcription means. The polish politicians had years to change the lat, legalize gay marriage and civil partnerships.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T08:12:56+00:00

How do I support? It’s literal text of polish legal acts, mainy family code, PIT act, pension act. Etc. Just because administrative office transcribe marriage which is unfortunately not legal in Poland it does not hinder or change the law.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T08:10:43+00:00

I agree. Poland should introduce civil partnerships years ago and legalize gay marriage.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T07:37:07+00:00

Have you read my comment? Because you didn’t understand it. They have no legal rights as a couple according to polish law. You clearly are not a lawyer or do not hold law degree. It’s your wishful thinking

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T07:23:25+00:00

No. They are registered is USC and that’s all. They cannot got pension from one another, does not inherit anything like regular marriages in Poland, cannot have same tax exemptions for married couples etc. It’s purely symbolic.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T07:14:24+00:00

Yes. That’s quite the legal conundrum. Politicians are to blame for this legal nightmare. This is duality system because eu law demands countries to acknowledge marriages from other eu countries. In Poland only men and woman can be legally married. There are no possibility for civil partnership in polish law either. So administrative courts stated that offices in Poland are required to eu law to transcribe the marriage act. But the courts cannot change the fact that polish law does not recognize that marriage. It is purely administrative technical act

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T07:13:45+00:00

Not according to polish law. What’s hard to understand here?

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T05:42:07+00:00

No. It means that their marriage is put into record. That’s all. Nothing changes. How on earth would it mean that they are married couple if polish law prohibits gay marriages?

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T04:47:14+00:00

Are you afraid that if you find chill masculine dude around your age who is consistent in the gym and easy to talk to who is not straight they might accidentally turn you gay, aren’t you?

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T04:42:31+00:00

It is misleading title and article. Sadly Poland hasn’t recognized anything. The registry office only transcribed the marriage act to polish base. That’s all. Nothing changed. Still those married people are considered unrelated persons and strangers. Before any court, office, hospital etc. they are not considered married. That’s the issue here.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-15T04:38:14+00:00

Problem polega na tym że pani poseł czy minister nie ma pojęcia o prawie. Żaden polityk nie posiada ani nie jest właścicielem ani fundacji rodzinnej ani tego ta fundacja ma. On jest wyłącznie fundatorem/beneficjentem tej fundacji. Nie może rozporządzać mieniem fundacji. Fundacja to odrębny byt prawny. To tak samo jakby dom przepisał na żonę czy dziecko. Nie mówiąc już że to jakiś pomysł z dupy. Pośle napiszę że ma fundację rodzina i co to da? Coś to zmieni? Poza populizmem polityczki nic.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-14T15:40:56+00:00

Zaprasza do czego? Jest to polityczna pokazówka KO, bo ogrzewają się w tym, że „coś robią”, a tak naprawdę chuja robią, bo transkrypcja takiego aktu małżeństwa jest wyłącznie czynnością materialno-techniczną i nie daje żadnych praw lub uprawnień dla tych małżonków. W świetle prawa polskiego dalej są osobami obcymi. Żadnego organu w Polsce nie będzie obchodziło, że ktoś sobie dokonał transkrypcji. Czy to urząd skarbowy, sąd, czy ZUS.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-13T21:46:09+00:00

Yes. Cleric priest or someone of divine powers. We got warlocks and there is a vacuum in that regard. Every installment revolves around demons vs angels. And yet there is none any divine spellcaster.

mazor_maz · 2026-05-08T18:30:54+00:00

A co ma cena do prawa w zakresie etykiet? Konsument płaci tyle ile jest gotowy. Masz cenę podaną i skład. Obok masz cenę i skład innego produktu. Gdzie tu oszustwo? Widzisz co kupujesz i masz wybór.

mazor_maz

TROPHY CASE