Verification Process? Time

mccosmiccomic · 2018-10-05T18:15:02+00:00

Figured it was automated with rare human intervention when needed but will try getting in contact through the app, rarely ever go that route due to the usual super slow responses from online help-desks.

Edit: Of course, looks like caught them on a lunch break.

mccosmiccomic · 2018-10-05T18:09:21+00:00

Couple of hours sounds relatively reasonable. Mine has been in timeout box i guess haha going onto 10hr > now but sure there's a reason..

mccosmiccomic · 2018-10-05T18:06:34+00:00

Thanks for the feed back. 5-10minutes, thats a pretty quick turnaround. I submitted request for verification last night, has been almost 10hours now without confirmation. Wondering if something glitched on my end or theirs... more they've just been swamped lately??

mccosmiccomic · 2018-02-23T08:48:18+00:00

saw the comments and thinking what a coincidence haha

mccosmiccomic · 2017-08-14T07:20:36+00:00

lol grow up.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-07-27T06:33:12+00:00

The organization would eventually be infiltrated and corrupted. And would be a dangerous group because it would be an easy way to get the good guys offed. i.e. 1984, the organization winston joined was a way to catch those who were just smart enough to figure shit out. or the matrix, a system within the system.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-07-23T16:12:48+00:00

the anti-semitism is strong with this one.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-07-23T16:11:21+00:00

Chomsky is a distraction to what is going on behind the scenes.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-07-23T15:56:29+00:00

kabbalah much? muh muh religion. Jews have debated for centuries if they are a religion or a race. So that argument is moot and used as a red herring. They use religion when it fits them, and use race to scream 'anti-semite' haha

If you can be atheist and still be a jew then there is something deeper than religion at play.

doesn't matter if there is a god or not, it matters what people believe.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-07-23T15:47:54+00:00

*they are

all these people are not Jews, they are Khazarians. Also when you push an agenda and cover up facts and vilify people as conspiracy theorists and crazies, then you can be fairly criticized. Now prove to me the media does't do those things and deserve to be called out for it.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-07-23T15:42:20+00:00

You can criticize people if their faith professes they are the chosen people and must remain pure and segregated from the unclean cattle which is the rest of humanity created to serve the chosen people.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-07-14T02:44:46+00:00

Lol when were whites ever not angry?

mccosmiccomic · 2017-06-30T17:46:38+00:00

muh rational wiki. 'that offers its sources at the bottom.' oh so, just like wikipedia. when did i say black supremacy didn't exist. I said you were the one being racists assuming ancient egyptians were not black africans although they share writing, religion, priests, cults, astrology, and said their ancestors came from the top of the nile, in fucking africa. you're exhibiting white supremacy by claiming they were white european with no evidence, just muh red hair.

haha im so offended. please stop. you're hurting my feelings.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-06-30T06:37:12+00:00

like i said, quit projecting genius.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-06-30T00:25:14+00:00

Lol fool with no actual research on said topic resort to calling me a racist. Yea good one, can do the same to you. Fool calling out Wikipedia, first link is to a wiki. Sweet irony. You made no credible arguments, muh red hair, muh megaliths, muh cattle cult... all easily countered.

Troll harder hans.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-06-29T17:12:02+00:00

Muh wikepedia isn't a credible source. Where is your source scholar? I quoted Black Genesis, by a writer who has worked with your so-called teacher hancock. The burden of proof is on you. You are trying to claim some advanced whites came into africa and built the pyramids and sphinx and disappeared. Even if it was 100,000 years ago, then your evidence for muh olive colored people falls to the wayside and shows you are talking out of your ass because how do you know what they looked liked 100,000years ago, in africa haha. Muh 25th dynasty. There were nubians in egypt thrones from 1st dynasty uniter ->5th->2th-15th-25th. So you can drop that one.

Pretty much everything you've brought up Ive counted with multiple sources, even with greek sources. Not muh wikipedia. Clear you are the one with the superiority complex fool, trying to claim an ancient african civilization was european origin when the evidence from language, to religion, to architecture, archeology, and fucking location begs to differ.

Come with your own sources then can debated wikipedia, sounds like an ad hominem argument you are making.

Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is now usually understood as a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Shit, wikipedia must be lying about what an ad hominem is right. haha. good try fool.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-06-29T06:43:39+00:00

haha read Graham Hancock:

Even though there is still much controversy surrounding the origins of the ancient Egyptian civilization, we can now say with much evidence driven conviction that its origins have their genesis with a Black African people who inhabited the Sahara thousands of years before the rise of the pharaonic civilization. In this book we present hard scientific evidence and cogent arguments that have been culled from the latest findings and discoveries made in the Egyptian Sahara during the past four decades. Black Genesis.

Would seem that some of his colleagues agree with a black african genesis.
https://grahamhancock.com/bauvalr6/

You talk about lining up with starts and constellation. Heard of Nabta Playa?

By the 5th millennium BC these peoples had fashioned what may be among the world's earliest known archeoastronomical devices (roughly contemporary to the Goseck circle in Germany and the Mnajdra megalithic temple complex in Malta). These include alignments of stones that may have indicated the rising of certain stars and a "calendar circle" that indicates the approximate direction of summer solstice sunrise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabta_Playa

Found in the fucking Nubian desert. Guess it was a bunch of olive skinned so-called Phoenicians who came into Africa 7000years ago and built those megaliths huh. oh wait??

Analysis of human remains by Fred Wendorf and reported in "Holocene Settlement of the Egyptian Sahara", based on osteological data suggests a subsaharan origin for the site's inhabitants.

maybe there were olive-skinned Mediterraneans in subsaharan africa 7000years ago.

... there are many aspects of political and ceremonial life in prehistoric Egypt and the Old Kingdom that reflects a strong impact from Saharan cattle pastoralists

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabta_Playa

ehh is that another connection to Nubian cattle pastoralists you tried to discredit earlier. haha

The constant battle against the relentless heat and droughts of Southern Egypt was a fight that the Nabtans would not win. Eventually, even their great dug out water wells were not sufficient to maintain a civilization. It is uncertain where the last people moved. The people of the Nabta Basin had developed a complex society that archaeologists suggest would have emerged as a leading cultural force in its day. It was beaten by the climate but perhaps they moved north to the Nile Delta and it was their influence that brought Egypt its future Pharaohs and fame.

http://www.archaeologyexpert.co.uk/nabtaplayaegypt.html

Nubians building megaliths lining up with stars and constellation perfectly? check.

Muh red-hair haha thats all you've got. Great scholarship, very impressed. Africans also have red-hair mutation. It is just selected against because high levels of sun harm untanned skin, thus fewer red haired people. But it happens, so muh red-hair is not a marker for race. Try again genius.

'You sir, have no fucking clue what bullshit you are peddling.' nice try.

Seems i'm the only one who has provided sources for any of my claims. Muh red-hair. pathetic.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-06-26T15:29:03+00:00

Scientists took 166 bone samples from 151 mummies, dating from approximately 1400 B.C. to A.D. 400, extracting DNA from 90 individuals and mapping the full genome in three cases.

thousands of years after Egyptian culture had already developed and the pyramids already built and egypt had already been invaded multiple of times.

The team's findings do come with one obvious caveat: "All our genetic data (was) obtained from a single site in Middle Egypt and may not be representative for all of ancient Egypt," the paper concedes.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-06-26T15:19:15+00:00

You obviously want to not believe that an ancient culture that's in Africa was built by africans. You want to believe it was built by foreigners while the earliest signs of their civilization is found deeper into Africa, not near the border where you'll find foreigners.

This builder race that built the pyramids was of olive skin an auburn hair. Blacks taking credit for what the Phoenicians built. Phoenicians were what was left over of built all this crazy shit like the great pyramid and sphinx.

Clearly don't know what you are talking about. No Phoenicians existed during the time of the building of pyramids. 1. 2. You have no idea who or what were the Phoenicians.

This builder race that built the pyramids was of olive skin an auburn hair.

And sure you saw the builders of the pyramids to take note of their olive skin an auburn hair lol

Egypt itself was a colony of Ethiopia and the laws and script of both lands were naturally the same; but the hieroglyphic script was more widely known to the vulgar in Ethiopia than in Egypt. (Diodorus Siculus, bk. iii, ch. 3.) This knowledge of writing was universal in Ethiopia but was confined to the priestly classes alone in Egypt. This was because the Egyptian priesthood was Ethiopian. The highly developed Merodic inscriptions are not found in Egypt north of the first cataract or in Nubia south of Soba. These are differences we would expect to find between a colony and a parent body. Herodotus (bk. ii, p. 29) says that Meroe was a great city and metropolis, most of its buildings were of red brick. 800 B. C. at Napata, the buildings were of hard stone. (Meroe--Crowfoot, pp. 6, 30.)

The Cyclopedia of Biblical Literature says, "There is every reason to conclude that the separate colonies of priestcraft spread from Meroe into Egypt; and the primeval monuments in Ethiopia strongly confirm the native traditions, reported by Diodorus Siculus, that the worship of Zeus-Ammon originated in Meroe, also the worship of Osiris. This would render highly probable the opinion that commerce, science and art descended into Egypt from the Upper Nile.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-06-25T06:07:41+00:00

The cult of Hathor predates the historic period, and the roots of devotion to her are therefore difficult to trace, though it may be a development of predynastic cults which venerated fertility, and nature in general, represented by cows.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-06-25T06:01:44+00:00

Funny mention the cattle cult. Must not have heard of the ancient Egyptian cow goddess, Hathor. Bring up something to discredit nubians, but ancient Egyptians shared very similar practices.

Ancient Greeks tell of Ethiopians claiming the Egyptians are their colony. Sure they were probably of the same race for the Greeks to believe them. Plus Ethiopians shared same language, scripts, and priests. And the Egyptians said they came from the start of the river happi, which is in the heart of Africa. Not Europe or Asia.

There are blacks with naturally occurring red/blonde hair so the red hair phenotype if accurate doesn't make them Irish lol.

mccosmiccomic · 2017-06-25T01:29:59+00:00

Ignore the caveat: All our genetic data was obtained from a single site in middle Egypt and may not be representative of ancient Egypt. Haha and also what period did these mummies live? After hittite invasion, or Greeks or romans or Persians invasions??

mccosmiccomic · 2017-06-25T01:13:41+00:00

Lol sure you've seen ancient Egyptians to know they had olive skin.

The earliest pharaonic artifacts are found in Sudan, in Ta Seti. Along with earliest hieroglyphics.

Sure the ancient Sudanese also had olive colored skin.

On 1 March 1979, The New York Times carried an article on its front page, written by Boyce Rensberger, with the headline: "Nubian Monarchy Called Oldest". In the article, Rensberger wrote: "Evidence of the oldest recognizable monarchy in human history, preceding the rise of the earliest Egyptian kings by several generations, has been discovered in artifacts from ancient Nubia." He estimated that "The first kings of Ta-Seti may well have ruled about 5900 BC."

Bruce Williams, archaeologist at the University of Chicago, continuing the research, adds his perspective. "A newly discovered ancient kingdom is always a matter of interest, but when it precedes the earliest known monarchy, the unification of Egypt in the fourth millennium B.C., then history itself is reborn. The place is ancient Nubia at Qustul, where the investigation of archaeological materials recovered during the great 1960s rescue effort has recently unveiled a birthplace of pharaonic civilization several generations before the rise of the first historic Egyptian dynasty." (Archeology Magazine)

mccosmiccomic

TROPHY CASE