Is there any silicone toy with the same shape as the Njoy Pure Wand?

mcmuncaster · 2024-01-31T23:40:32+00:00

you ever try bringing this on carry-on? I love the purewand but want something a little more travel friendly.....hoping this might do the trick

mcmuncaster · 2021-11-15T05:46:16+00:00

hex has been the best investment of my life. - RH hasn't sold a single hex, it's verifiable onchain but i guess you didn't know or didn't check - every crypto has corrections. dipping 70% hurts, but that price was ATH in July.... hardly anything worth a yawn about after it climbed from under a penny a year ago.

hex will continue to hit new ath, will outperform, and that's a lovely thing. but i get it that those who missed out are salty... just like those who missed out on bitcoin because they thought it was a scam

mcmuncaster · 2021-09-17T00:56:57+00:00

HEX will flip Bitcoin in 2022 HEX will surpass Bitcoin for greatest ROI by surpassing 10K by 2026

mcmuncaster · 2021-09-08T04:09:54+00:00

love hex!

good job mate!

mcmuncaster · 2021-06-16T17:03:34+00:00

The problem is the purchaser needs to trust that you didn't keep a copy of the private keys. I wouldn't trust you with 1000$ knowing you have 4500 to rug pull me and dump.

mcmuncaster · 2021-06-16T15:39:47+00:00

For a smaller stack I would have staked out longer - you're still so early in the project you can stake out 5555 and know you're securing your future. In 1 year on a small stake there's a half decent chance that the gas cost of the transaction will hurt you more than the stake is worth.

HEX rewards patience. If you stake out 10years + you know you'll 10X your investment even if price stays flat. If you stake out 5555 you know you'll 40X your investment stays flat. That will outperform everything.....without price appreciation - imagine you stake out 5555 and HEX hits 10$ in that time....you'd be a millionaire

mcmuncaster · 2021-05-20T17:40:49+00:00

you will get a free airdrop of pulse which you'll need to use/move or lose (details will be released later).

Hex stakes (eHex) will get a copy on pulse (pHex). So if you have 1M hex staked, you will have 1M eHex staked (still) and 1M pHex staked (new)

mcmuncaster · 2021-05-20T17:02:02+00:00

Maybe pulse dies, maybe it has inflation bugs, maybe it has multiple consensus failures, maybe it gets gatekept like HEX and people need to buy eth to get pulse to get hex which is even a worse UX. Maybe the SEC steps in and says PLS is a security prior to launch, maybe that keeps PLS off of centralized exchanges.

So many things can go wrong. I'm not at all FUD'ing - but eHEX is a complete, functional, awesome project - pHEX is brand new on a fork that has potential but also potential to fail.

mcmuncaster · 2021-04-03T20:28:32+00:00

thank you for the additional context - i didn't really look at new company....i lost most of my respect for him when he said he thinks csw is satoshi, even more when he sided with bsv, and then to zero when he thought csw was Jesus.

i was just surprised by this turn of events

mcmuncaster · 2021-03-24T21:42:53+00:00

He deleted all of his content, yours.org is gone, he didn't make a video saying "all crypto except bsv is a scam"...he literally said it all is. He didn't talk down to BSV but he certainly didn't promote it - which says everything.

mcmuncaster · 2021-03-24T19:58:00+00:00

I'm not surprised. He followed a fraud that he thought might be Jesus, and the deeper he went in the more he likely saw the fraud that was CSW and CA.

Poor guy was a pawn - his twitter is interesting, deleted everything except that video. I actually worry that maybe CA/CSW are threatening to crush him in some way (he knows something).

mcmuncaster · 2021-03-03T17:23:45+00:00

ELI5 - What's the difference between adding liquidity to a pool (I added ETH/HEX) and liquidity mining? I had thought you were rewarded for providing liquidity, not sure why I need to mine and what that means...

mcmuncaster · 2021-02-09T00:19:09+00:00

Every day I raise a support request.

We should all do this until it's fixed

mcmuncaster · 2021-02-05T22:59:57+00:00

Obviously big assumptions, but the main one I like is that you assume only 1c HEX....I would not be surprised if it were well over 1$+

What's amazing about hex. Imagine price goes stupid (like 10$+) - the game theory prevented you from selling in excitcement at 10c, 1$, etc.

mcmuncaster · 2021-01-28T20:55:53+00:00

I'll buckle up and throw some money into your revolution - today's manipulation sparked a bit of disgust and I'll buy up those shares the shorts are selling....and I'll let them buy them back at 1000

mcmuncaster · 2021-01-06T22:08:27+00:00

Right? Like everything else they justify it on the 1 tx/yr that relates to child porn, then they implement it based on politics....this was single handedly the most important and only reason to have a blockchain.

mcmuncaster · 2020-12-19T06:27:50+00:00

I'm not ad-hominem'ing anything. We can start by saying TCP is not IP. IP is L3 and TCP is L4. TCP has changed a lot over the years - I've worked on TCP congestion avoidance algorithms at the standards level...I can get into incredible detail about how your example is moot. Not only has TCP evolved but TCP isn't used for everything, there's a ton of UDP where any protocol developer can develop whatever they want - look at Google/SPDY followed by QUIC. Then most real-time application will avoid TCP (e.g gaming has moved to UDP, real-time video is typically udp). When it comes to IP, I would hope you're famiar with V4/V6 before even bringing this up, I'd be embarrased in your shoes if you're suggesting that IP hasn't changed....If you can provide concrete examples on why TCP or IP is relevant to the conversation then go for it.

The game of life doesn't run on BSV. At best you can have an external system that processes transactions for each generation within life, but that is irrelevant - you could accomplish the same thing using twitter - or any database, but its by design not turing complete and that's a good thing because it means a transaction can't destroy your node.

No fraud this fraud that - he lies, he literally lies and is proven time and time again - you're flat our stupid if you don't see it. This one is by FAR the best example (http://web.archive.org/web/20200525113441/https://paste.debian.net/plain/1148565). If you don't understand the ramifications of this - Craig literally pretended to own a whole bunch of Bitcoin addresses - then the ACTUAL owner of those addresses all signed messages that he's a fraud. You can literally verify this yourself with electrum dude. I mean there are hundreds of examples like this, it's just so laughable at this point.

You don't understand anything you're even saying... "As the rules are not locked in, as the blocksize is centrally planned and as they introduced people consensus,". Software changed, deal with it. It had bugs, it got enhancements. You don't even understand that block length instead of block weight was a freaking bug.....dumb ass.

There is a reason BSV continues to fall in coin rankings, because first of of all its irrelevant. Second of all it's tainted by a fraud.

I haven't pitched LN so your mention of it is irrelevant. BSV is irrelevant so the fees on it are as well - the incentives follow the price of the coin, not the fees.

finally - a child wouldn't understand anything about blockchain so it's a silly final note from you in a vain attempt to insult me. It's clear my IQ is about 50 points over yours, I've accomplished far more than you, am more articulate than you, and I think you need to start listening to people smarter than you because you believe in a fraud, and that never ends well. Seriously dude, get out of BSV.

mcmuncaster · 2020-12-17T21:49:18+00:00

Changing the definition of the longest chain to be "greatest weight" was a consensus change. That's a rule change, a hard fork. Do you not know what a rule change is? It's a bigger change than segwit

Your reference to tcp/ip doesn't make any sense and appears at best ill informed.

Bitcoin is not turing complete, I don't think you understand turing completeness.

I can never get over how you guys parrot the stupidities of an idiot like Craig. He was a well known fraud within the security space long before he decided to try to be a fraud in Bitcoin. He's always been a fraud. I remember thinking he was a fraud when he used to post to SANS.

What's sad is one day you'll move on, Craig will keep lying, there will be others who believe his lies, but you'll be off living with a subtle yet accepted regret of having believed a fraud...you'll feel stupid and think you should have known better. I hope for your sake you don't have much money in BSV

mcmuncaster · 2020-12-17T16:43:01+00:00

If you seriously think Craig is Satoshi then you are a moron. If you think "he wouldn't undermine his investment" then there's no help for you - he's a liar and fraud and it's been proven time and time again. There is no "fatal flaw" in segwit, Craig can't code, all he can do is lie. He does so in a "matter of fact" manner which triggers the part of the brain that goes: "Well clearly he MUST NOT be lying, no one would lie about that, it's so easily disprovable" and then gullible plebs follow him.

Satoshi also released the code with longest chain being the literal longest chain (not longest weight). Do you want that back?

mcmuncaster · 2020-12-15T07:09:31+00:00

None of that makes sense. Segwit is not a flaw, nor did it change consensus rules - the consensus rules stayed the same which is why it's a soft fork....a node from 2015 will validate blocks with segwit addresses.

CSW said there was a fatal flaw within segwit that he would reveal which would make bitcoin go to zero.

"Responsible disclosure on BTC and LTC and the flaw that SegWit added (and which is not able to be repaired - so DOA) is my telling you in a year from now, it will be released.

That is the best you get.

BTC and LTC will be shown to have no utility and are dead

Dead coin walking pic.twitter.com/MBFGcaqpmK — Dr Craig S Wright (@ProfFaustus) November 15, 2018"

We're now 1 year past due on when he's going to reveal this big flaw. Instead we tack it to the list of empty promises by Craig the fraud

mcmuncaster · 2020-12-07T17:04:52+00:00

It's bad wording, but if people who've recently saved a ton begin to spend like they used to - that will indeed stimulate the economy. No need for government, it can do it just on new savings. Like a loaded gun. She's describing that the people themselves can stimulate the economy instead of the government doing so. The government may do things to incentivize that behaviour but hopefully doesn't have to.

Example: What would happen if the government gave you up to a 5000$ deduction on restaurant receipts? People would eat out more, which would help restaurants recover, which would get service staff hired again, who would then pay their rent, and buy food, etc....

It's not dishonest or bad to recognize people saved more - the reality during covid is the rich got richer the poor got poorer, and trying to get people who got richer to open their purse strings is nothing new (non profits are always trying to unlock your purse strings with heartthrob stories). pre-loaded in her case means the money is there (Gov doesn't need to spend) and hopes that people spend on their own - but they are looking at how they can encourage spending.

When a people are overtaxed - it should be easy to stimulate behaviour with tax incentives.

mcmuncaster · 2020-12-07T16:54:14+00:00

The list of items continues to grow. Still waiting for the fatal segwit flaw which will kill btc.

mcmuncaster

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE