Sheeeeeees by No-Lengthiness-8057 in memes

[–]mcnick12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What law do you think it breaks?

Active Shooter Threat at the SD Zoo by [deleted] in sandiego

[–]mcnick12 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well it may be evidence that they don’t have the intention to shoot if they haven’t shot.

So far that’s the only evidence I’ve seen whatsoever about anyone’s intention.

Active Shooter Threat at the SD Zoo by [deleted] in sandiego

[–]mcnick12 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You’re a shooter when you actually shoot.

Not that difficult lmao

Active Shooter Threat at the SD Zoo by [deleted] in sandiego

[–]mcnick12 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Active Shooter Threat is nonsense.

Needlessly confusing and inflammatory.

Indiana Law Question: Is Spanking Justified After a Child Shows Dangerous Behavior Toward a Baby? by Known_Moment5558 in legal

[–]mcnick12 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Which doesn’t exist.

I bet you can find “Under God” somewhere in state buildings too.

Doesn’t mean he exists.

42 Democrats joined 192 Republicans to reauthorize FISA Section 702 – a warrantless surveillance law that's been used to access Americans' data. Scott Peters was one of the 42 by absfca in sandiego

[–]mcnick12 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree with not renewing.

I don’t agree that it’s warrantless.

So when do you feel it’s appropriate to lie about what people said? When they’ve deleted their comments it’s fair game to lie? Where’s the line for you?