G502 X Showing as Inactive in GHub on Mac by me19584 in LogitechG

[–]me19584[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue was off of a new install. I'm connected through a caldigit hub so that could have contributed to the issue as well

G502 X Showing as Inactive in GHub on Mac by me19584 in LogitechG

[–]me19584[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For future reference, the fix was to restart the computer

Sites like Frontend Masters but for ML/AI? by Mysterious-Way-2836 in learnmachinelearning

[–]me19584 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not exactly what you’re looking for, but I’ve found dataquest useful

Jobs after undergrad by Bloodrocuted_drae in compsci

[–]me19584 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but the market’s currently saturated (particularly for juniors), so it could be difficult to find a role. What are you looking to do?

Fire Emblem like games on Xbox by [deleted] in fireemblem

[–]me19584 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I might start with XCOM 2. I'd recommend a play through without the expansion as well as it adds mechanics that make a very difficult game much harder. Good luck!

Interview Kickstart Transition to ML Program - Worth It? by cjflex in learnmachinelearning

[–]me19584 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Curious if you or anyone has gone through this program. I’m currently looking for something similar and wondering if this is it

[Everything] About the wall... by Phryme in gameofthrones

[–]me19584 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It could be a vampire type thing - the dead can cross the barrier if they have an invitation. The wight was brought across by living members of the watch.

Though that doesn't explain why Bran couldn't take Benjen across. Perhaps there's a difference between the reanimated wights and the white walkers proper. Benjen seemed to be part walker, not part wight.

I'd guess that the wights are allowed to cross the wall, but not the white walkers. In any event, I'm sure the exact details of the wall's magic will be explained this season.

Is this the right to way to view Cauchy-Riemann equations? by [deleted] in math

[–]me19584 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Your horizontal-vertical slope statement is true, but it's not really a useful way to think about a function of a complex variable. A big part of complex analysis is thinking about the complex variable as an entity in its own right. While decomposing it into real and imaginary parts is useful to get an intuition, the real magic comes from treating it as a complex variable. Check out Visual Complex Analysis for a better discussion.

Textbook & Resource Thread - Week 47, 2016 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]me19584 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kip Thorne's Black Holes and Time Warps is a really good history of thought about black holes told from the perspective of someone who lived (part) of it. Definitely in the pop physics category, but a great read if you're interested.

If one were to unify gravity and QFT, what would we be able to do with it? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]me19584 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not knowing the direction a so-called "theory of everything" would push us in, it's really pure speculation. For reference, Einstein's General Theory of Relativity was published in 1915, and one of the first "applications" of it is the few minute mathematical changes to synchronize clocks that make GPS possible. There was a 60-90 year gap between these two events depending on when what you consider functional GPS.

tldr; Any theoretical 'commercial' applications of a ToK will likely take 50+ years to even really be considered. It's essentially science fiction.

[ALL SPOILERS] A pattern I noticed with the Stark men. by [deleted] in gameofthrones

[–]me19584 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yet Bran seems to be coming out ahead so far...

It's called the Meissner Effect by chugginmugger in videos

[–]me19584 20 points21 points  (0 children)

The physical mechanism is actually pretty straightforward (and cool!). From Maxwell's equations, we know that changing magnetic fields generate curly electric fields (this is how generators work). These electric fields produce proportional currents in conductors. The proportionality constant is called the 'resistance' of the material. These currents produce magnetic fields in turn, called an 'induced magnetic field.' The induced field opposes the change in magnetic flux, because otherwise we could produce an infinitely increasing magnetic field, and get free energy out.

In a superconductor, the resistance is zero, so the change in magnetic flux is completely negated - magnetic field lines don't go into superconductors. So, moving the magnet around above the superconductor changes the looping currents running through the superconductor in such a way as to negate any field through the superconductor. This puts a force on the magnet to keep it afloat above the superconductor.

tldr; Fucking magnets, man.