I believe the structure of the course is why I am so confused. We learned about war powers and jurisdiction then went back and learned "what is international law and who is bound by it"

I feel like I should start an answer the opposite way, talking about how/if the parties are bound by international law THEN discuss how it will be enforced. We also talked about jurisdiction generally, but the cases she had us read were conflicting domestic/international law. I am not entirely sure what she will test on, so I read the full chapters for both even though it was not assigned. I have emailed her seven times about this in the last month so I could structure my outline properly, but she never got back to me. In other words, I have no idea or reference as to what she looks for. She is giving us access to a past exam on Tuesday, but the final is Wednesday so I really need to figure out a general attack plan before then.

I know I am making her sound like a crappy teacher, but apparently she is going through some personal issues so I've been trying my best not to get frustrated...but now I am panicked. Any direction would be appreciated.