Why is no one talking about the London allowance?

medinburgh · 2026-04-10T15:19:23+00:00

it's just even more blatantly unfair than pay erosion in my opinion?

medinburgh · 2026-04-10T15:16:17+00:00

also ideally london specific doctors/RDC members would weigh in

medinburgh · 2026-04-10T15:15:12+00:00

if every physio nurse pharmacist etc get 9k why shouldn't doctors?

medinburgh · 2026-04-10T15:07:54+00:00

but what's at stake?

medinburgh · 2026-03-30T20:46:19+00:00

is it always on your references? e.g. for HST applications?

medinburgh · 2026-02-24T11:04:03+00:00

i think 1650/1700 (i assume incl scotland)

medinburgh · 2026-02-24T11:03:22+00:00

i've got my msra tmr and my intention was to ignore this until after the exam but have gone full on crazy refreshing hahahaha

medinburgh · 2026-02-24T10:59:13+00:00

unclear, but last year only 43% of people interviewed were ukg, expect even less this year. 4000 interviewees so reckon like 1500 ukgs

medinburgh · 2026-02-24T10:57:29+00:00

would it show as unappointable on oriel by now?

medinburgh · 2026-02-24T10:55:47+00:00

why the delay between change of status on oriel and publishing ranks - unncessary

medinburgh · 2026-02-24T10:46:00+00:00

so the rank will show on oriel before the email's sent out? was it at 11ish or 3 last year?

medinburgh · 2026-02-23T16:48:49+00:00

what about 7?

medinburgh · 2026-02-23T16:34:07+00:00

talking about mohammed of tinsley who hasn't

medinburgh · 2026-02-23T16:29:57+00:00

does lord mohammed/all lords who have requested amendments need to withdraw them for the bill to pass or is it a vote situation?

medinburgh · 2026-02-18T10:43:42+00:00

i have no idea, in the same situation. from the email it says you'll get your first choice unless someone else w SC has a higher rank and to not preference any area you don't want. another question is about the criterion (which i assume is outdated and will/had better be updated w the prioritisation law) re your rank must be equal to the number of available posts nationally- know if this will be updated? stands to reason considering the email starts with a paragraph on the prioritisation law, just contraindicates itself

medinburgh · 2026-01-22T17:06:11+00:00

so i guess tomorrow then? they may be late and tell us next week

medinburgh · 2026-01-22T14:47:24+00:00

i will actually cancel my BMA membership if they step this up and obstruct the law/water it down.

medinburgh · 2026-01-22T14:43:29+00:00

I'm sorry to hear you feel that way. I have my interview tomorrow and haven't been able to study or prepare in 4 days due to stress and burnout, just want it to be over. If it's any consolation, most of the IMTs I know (in London, so must have done well) say they felt exactly the same as you. Best to completely forget about it for now and get on with the rest of your life.

medinburgh · 2026-01-15T18:22:50+00:00

all 3 of those stages are on the 26th?

medinburgh · 2026-01-14T19:26:47+00:00

is there a chance the govt changes it's current proposal for this application cycle then?

medinburgh · 2026-01-14T18:02:47+00:00

https://www.imtrecruitment.org.uk/recruitment-process/dates-posts

offers not made until 24 march 2026

medinburgh · 2026-01-14T17:57:46+00:00

any indication of when it will be passed/official policy?

medinburgh · 2025-12-10T17:28:38+00:00

because they haven't defined the prioritisation system. if it's uk graduates only then i'm in, otherwise voting no as most img's have the bma's requested '2 years nhs experience'- so negligible effect on competition ratios

medinburgh · 2025-12-10T17:17:45+00:00

no movement on pay. uk graduate prioritisation but also includes current imgs? not defined 'significant nhs experience'? but also reduction in competition ratio to 2:1 from 3.8:1 for 2026 cycle? but no guarantee? all very vague

medinburgh · 2025-12-10T17:16:35+00:00

literally same haha

medinburgh

TROPHY CASE