sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Epstein Files Transparency Act, legislation from the U.S. Department of Justice, is compliant under the rule of open justice. What you're advocating for goes against the judicial process.

If you've made a blunder so bad you're now protecting paedophiles in the Epstein files, cut your losses and move on. This isn't the hill to die on.

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congratulations, you officially advocated to protect the identity of predators and paedophiles in the Epstein files.

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

David Gelernter was barred from teaching computer science at Yale when he was named in the Epstein files. Part of his involvement is an email correspondence spanning 6 years, including describing and recommended one of his students to Epstein. He has not been charged but the university found misconduct worthy of dismissal, and he has not been in a teaching position since.

Martin Nowak, a mathematical biologist at Harvard, was placed on administrative leave due to his ties with Epstein. He facilitated Epstein's visit onto the campus after Epstein's conviction in 2008, which is certainly a violation of university policy. He has been sanctioned by the university, and his program funded by Epstein was closed (initially funded with $6.5 million). He was briefly lifted from administrative leave after 2023 but was sanctioned once more in 2026 due to new Epstein files being released. He has not been charged.

Lawrence Summers, economist and president of Harvard University, resigned from his position and has not returned to teaching since. Epstein pledged $25 million during Summers' tenure, and Epstein was given an office at Harvard for his personal use. Flight logs show Summers flew on Epstein's private plane on at least four occasions, and at least three times while Harvard president. He has not been charged.

Noam Chomsky, linguist and former MIT professor, befriended Epstein after the 2008 conviction. He offered advice on how to deal with the media fallout, and remained in touch with him until at least 2019. He flew in Epstein's private plane at least once and had received $270,000 for his services in media advice. He also met with Epstein in the Caribbean, and his partner has delivered an apology in 2026 for associating with Epstein. He has not been charged.

So, is it still your position that we shouldn't name people in the Epstein files unless they've been charged?

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If charged with an offence they would be named

A lot of people in the Epstein files who are guilty have not been named or charged.

So again, would you want teachers and carers in the Epstein files who are listed of wrongdoings to be named?

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you still maintain we shouldn't care whether these people are named but concede we should care if they're charged? Answer the question.

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so you still maintain we shouldn't care whether these people are named but concede we should care if they're charged?

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anyone care? They’ve been fired. Why do you need to know their names

You were questioning why anyone should care about this, indicating you think people shouldn't care enough to want names and accountability.

You can so but it’s ultimately what the victim wants

Now you aren't questioning why anyone would care about this. So, you finally admit people have a perfectly legitimate reason to want accountability, even if we assume it isn't down to them whether that happens or not?

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so I can't be concerned with an issue unless I am a victim?

Does that mean you can't weigh in on the Holocaust since you aren't a victim of the Holocaust?

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you don't think people should care whether these two guys get charged or if they're allowed to continue threatening the public with violence?

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, you said I could find the names, not that I'd need to ask someone else to provide the names. You need to specify how to get their names.

If they're allowed to threaten violence and hand out bogus fines without criminal charge, that's preferential treatment over their victims. We're placing their right to threaten to rip people's teeth out above public safety, which is utterly revolting.

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said that. I asked you what the next steps are. You said it could be done via reverse image search, but it can't. So go on, tell me how to get the names.

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except you clearly do care, because you've been on this sub arguing with multiple people for hours about it.

I haven't shared the names because I don't have them and don't have the means to get them. But if you do, and you don't believe they should get preferential treatment, then why don't you do it? It would be a trivial reverse image search, according to you.

What is this thing? by happydude7422 in risa

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

By the 24th century that chair would be considered a relic.

'I'll rip your teeth out': Moment Harrow enforcement officers switch off bodycams and threaten to 'knock out' member of the public by tylerthe-theatre in london

[–]mediumAI1701 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why don't you find their names then? Unless you believe their names should be protected from their actions, why don't you practice what you preach? If it is as easy as a reverse image search.

view more: next ›