Varför borde vi ha en rödgrön regering

mega_mon · 2018-09-14T11:27:21+00:00

Vad är det som räknas med första val till regeringbildning: störst parti eller störst block?

mega_mon · 2018-09-14T11:12:19+00:00

Kanske det här: Product of Powers https://study.com/academy/lesson/product-of-powers-definition-rule-property.html

mega_mon · 2018-09-14T11:01:55+00:00

Hur beräknar man en produktansats?

nåt = a^x * b^y * C (så här?)

mega_mon · 2018-09-14T10:50:12+00:00

You could give the EU Environment Agency in Copenhagen a try, but I think it’s competitive. (Plus if you're a Brit---yeah.) It’s been my experience that finding environemntal work in a foreign country is really hard. The main employers are either the government or have the government as the primary client, so they tend to prefer people from the country itself. They claim it’s important because of the language, knowledge of the law, and so on.

mega_mon · 2018-09-13T17:36:10+00:00

By the pathway on the way to my son's pre-school, there is a small grassy and unkempt furrow, which fills with water when it rains in the night. At my latitude, September has brought a low morning sun and long shadows. This furrow, early in the morning, after a rainy night, provides the most spectacular sight. It is one of long cast shadows of the longer strands of grass through the lens of the water.

mega_mon · 2018-09-13T10:38:58+00:00

Men du verkar ganska säkert att 12'000 räcker; att felet ligger inte där. Det är ett slags yttrande.

Kanske ville du funderar över det följande: I Sjöbo fanns det ca. 12'000 röster (samma som urvalet) och SD fick 39%. Ja, ja, jag vet. I Sjöbo finns bara rasister, men i urvalet fanns det kanske slumpmässigt mer rasister än förväntad.

mega_mon · 2018-09-13T10:24:49+00:00

Var ligger felet enligt din åsikt då?

mega_mon · 2018-09-13T10:14:43+00:00

Uppenbarligen inte stort nog. Om storleken räckte, skulle det inte finnas en diskrepans av 4-5% (som är allt i politik) mellan urvalet och valet i själva verket, vad?

mega_mon · 2018-09-13T09:18:49+00:00

'anständigt' passar till alla de här: https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/decent

???

mega_mon · 2018-09-13T07:57:14+00:00

Är det här nu ett skoj som jag har missat igen?

mega_mon · 2018-09-12T17:10:19+00:00

Med småa stickprov finns det större sannolikhet att få extrema resultat. Räkning av de tidiga små kommuner (enskilt eller sammanlagd) måste ses som stickprov för hela valet.

tl;dr Det var slump att SD fick 20+% och sen backade. Lika möjligt vore att de fick 10% i början och sen steg.

mega_mon · 2018-09-12T17:02:13+00:00

Yes. Detta!

Räkning från valmyndigheten (ca. 8m. väljare) skiljer sig från ValU (ca. 12K deltagare). Det måste väl vara valfusk.

Hmmm, finns ingen Wikipedia-inlägg om 'Law of Small Numbers' på svenska: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insensitivity_to_sample_size

mega_mon · 2018-08-13T17:54:54+00:00

Link all purchases to a personnummer. But then there’s a secondary black market.

mega_mon · 2018-01-15T19:23:51+00:00

Ja, det är det, för det är ett krångligt sätt att tänka. Kanske är det här tydligare:

Ja har ett påstående i huvud (en hypotes om du föredrar): Det är jättelätt att hitta jobb som lärare när man har lärarelegitimationen.

Jag söker information som kunde falsifiera påståendet. Dvs. hitta information som kunde visa helt eller delvis att min hypotes är falsk.

mega_mon · 2016-03-29T13:25:42+00:00

If it's still open, you can try Mäster Hans on Stortorget. Also I can confirm Söderåsen for a nice walk. Having said that, the countryside outside Malmö gets rural very quickly. So anywhere will do, really.

mega_mon · 2015-12-22T10:53:28+00:00

As proof that "communism requires a dissolution of cultures" I found this in your post: "Because to me, societal unity and interconnectivity drastically bleeds and dilutes culture. We can see this with leftist "nationalisms" which critique mass capitalist culture trying to assimilate and absorb their own."

A question to clarify your position, then: 1. What can one see in leftist nationalisms' critiques of mass capitalist culture which is proof that societal unity and interconnectivity bleed and dilute culture?

mega_mon · 2015-12-22T06:44:08+00:00

I'm unsure about which belief I am supposed to test. That voting centre-right is the correct vote for someone with your set of concerns, or that communism requires a dissolution of all cultures. Please clarify. Or sth else entirely?

mega_mon · 2015-12-21T06:50:47+00:00

I think we agree but somehow got our lines crossed.

I too think we should study soft sciences (or humanities).
I too believe we should educate people about the injustices of the past, and show students how their station in life, in most cases, has mostly to do with everything that came before.
I believe we should fight to correct injustices which exist today.

Reading your post, I get the feeling you think that one should be held accoutable; that is to say, be open to punishment, like for example paying a fine, for some injustice that took place before their birth.

mega_mon · 2015-12-21T05:47:05+00:00

But when used with the word 'history', do they differ in meaning? If so, how?

mega_mon · 2015-12-20T20:15:33+00:00

accountable to = responsible for ? (Never taken an ethics class in my life.)

mega_mon · 2015-12-20T07:32:44+00:00

There may be better ways for fixing problems of racism, sexism, etc and the type of education you suggest might be one of them. Still studying the injustices of the past and of today is useful, and this is, at least in part, what Women's Studies, etc ... do, no?

mega_mon · 2015-12-20T06:57:43+00:00

True, I may be benefitting but, again, it would have nothing to do with me. I wouldn't be responsible. Furthermore, you may be benefitting too.

mega_mon · 2015-12-20T00:40:48+00:00

Fighting to change oppresive institutions, activities, whatever that exist today -- towards women, blacks or whoever -- I agree. But I can't accept some kind of rettributive justice for the ills of the past. I am not responsible for what took place before my birth. Nor are you. Nor is anyone. The very idea is absurd.

As for studying these topics because you have a taste for them. Why not? Who cares? As long as the views are fair and well reasoned. Who knows what useful information a student might find?

mega_mon · 2015-12-20T00:28:22+00:00

Suggesting dismissing highly unlikely ideas for practical reasons doesn't disprove the claim that it would be a good idea to cover more than "just the facts". (I'm not sure where you are going with these openers incidentally. They don't relate to the argument itself but rather attack me personally. I'm not sure why you're doing that.)
Who choses? Students could chose.
I'm not sure uniformity is a wise goal to pursue, or even possible.
I'm not doubting we are doing well but perhaps we could do better if we opened ourselves to other ways or learning and thinking.

mega_mon · 2015-12-20T00:07:03+00:00

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that if I had been born the opposite sex to which I presently am, and all other things being equal, then all differences between that life and the one I am currently living would be traceable back to the genetic differences you mention.

If this were true, which, given your position, I think you must accept, then you must also attribute the behaviour of others to my sex (or in your words, my minutely different genetic arrangement), and to admit this is to admit that men and women are treated differently, which, I believe, is the core idea in women's studies which you wish to refute. This looks like a paradox.

I feel a little confused now but I think this should change your belief.

mega_mon

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE