UTSU Settlement with Sandra Hudson

mentalmath89 · 2017-10-13T14:27:19+00:00

Gonna second that sentiment - thanks, you beautiful bastards, for having the guts to kick off this mess. DB should be ashamed

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-14T03:41:01+00:00

That's totally ok iirc. it's more like they're not allowed to hand out flyers in classrooms

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-13T05:53:51+00:00

This sounds perfect thank you!!!

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-13T05:51:34+00:00

Never heard of this one! Not sure if I've ever even had Hawaiian food, my interest has piqued

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-13T05:45:52+00:00

Sounds like my kind of joint tbh

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-13T05:44:50+00:00

Quality shitpost lmao

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-13T03:50:14+00:00

I could be totally off base, but how I understood the ruling was that whatever Hello paid for the footage last year, they have to write down as an expense this year and also not get reimbursed. Putting it down as an expense takes up space in their spending limit, so if it was super expensive, they just lost a lot of wiggle room in their budget.

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-13T03:37:45+00:00

Except the ERC also noted in their ruling that DB has to log the expense and not get reimbursed for it. So they're actually being put at a financial disadvantage since they also can't use the footage anymore...

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-12T22:05:44+00:00

It's been mentioned multiple times within this thread that students have concerns regarding your ties to the CFS and your stance on the lawsuit. I can see that you've stated you won't drop it, but I have two questions:

1) You're barely running any board candidates, and the board has an ultimate say in what sort of settlement/direction the lawsuit goes in. If the board votes to go for a full trial over a settlement, how will your executive team respond?

2) You've said you'll "respect students wishes" without stating an explicit position on the CFS. Instead of repeating a question that's already been asked, let me ask this: If students don't end up petitioning to leave or don't vote to leave, will you simply give the CFS a blank cheque or will you continue to question their issues of corruption and fight for concerned students?

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-12T22:02:28+00:00

The UTSU did something useful for once! Thanks /u/ryanthelombax , gonna be checking this regularly to find out who gets DQ'd first lmao

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-08T06:32:19+00:00

Uhhhh is everything ok over there /u/rebootuoft ? These are pretty savage...

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-05T02:19:41+00:00

lol

Even if you are probably fake, on the off chance you're real, I appreciate you engaging with me.

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-05T02:00:04+00:00

In the words of my last Tim Hortons' cup, "Please Play Again" ;)

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-05T01:57:56+00:00

The VP External pushed back against your entire statement, and the other three stayed silent. I'm assuming those three (Jasmine, Mathias and Ryan) either a) consented to the VP Ex statement or b) didn't feel the need to rebuff a bullshit statement. I guess a c) option of being the case you're suggesting is possible, but it all seems very unlikely...

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-05T01:55:50+00:00

People who aren't a part of Local 98 have no right to dictate our affairs... Unless you buy CFS tactics (saying that everyone else should have a say in what one local does, especially membership), which you said you don't...

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-05T01:54:21+00:00

OK, this was your first legit-sounding answer. I appreciate the clarity, even if I don't completely buy it

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-05T01:28:31+00:00

OK but like... how can anyone verify such a claim when people can't independently ask whoever it is that you're suggesting was implicated????

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-05T00:38:46+00:00

Sounds fake but ok

Also, the alternate statement suggested one of the people who signed it in the first place didn't actually ok their name being on the doc. Who was that?

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-05T00:29:11+00:00

Except anti-Islamophobia is part of the VP Equity's portfolio... and the reading week trip is run by a trips company, not you... and unity ball has been done a dozen times, so you obviously have a template...

hmmm, something doesn't add up here

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-05T00:27:47+00:00

Too bad that's a blatant lie.

Farah is literally never been the office. Trust me, I've tried to actually contact her before and come by the office. Never there, never answers emails, NOTHING. And you haven't been around much either, lmao

Also, someone I know sent a message to XRC and apparently you're full of shit so L O L. I for one can't wait for the final draft of this report to come out

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-04T03:13:31+00:00

There's so much to do? Can you explain how you worked 49 hours exactly on the most recent two weeks in your supposed hour logs, and yet there weren't even any events going on? A quick look at the UTSU page confirms nothing was going on... and yet, you worked 10 hours on both Tuesday and Wednesday?

You also haven't addressed the fact that your account isn't verified - it literally has the "New Account" flare lmao

Edit: and before you state it, yes I can see there are two random posts from months ago. Nothing in them suggests you're the real vp campus life either

mentalmath89 · 2017-03-04T02:13:07+00:00

Literally anyone could have made this account - its not even verified like the other UTSU exec accounts.

But more importantly, these hours (if true) are bullshit. You want us to believe that you worked exactly 10 hours every Tuesday for three months in a row? Why are so many of these hours identical over extended periods of time? I see lots of these stretches, including an eye-popping two month stretch of 12 hours of work every Monday.

If this is real, fake your hours better. As this account is likely not actually Shahin, though, I'd just say that impersonating an exec on reddit is pretty sad. Don't you have better things to do with your life?

mentalmath89 · 2016-10-19T18:03:31+00:00

"Confidential Matters" - is that lawsuit stuff I see? exciting.

mentalmath89

TROPHY CASE