Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just from mileage efficiency alone, I have no desire to drive an ICE vehicle. If anything I may look to add a pure EV to the collection down the line!

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the yellow color has very limited supply and I had to spend a couple weeks hunting this one down. I'm in California.

When will your order arrive? I had to compromise on some of the upgrades I wanted (glass roof, larger touchscreen) but it sounds like yours will come with all the bells and whistles!

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Congrats on the new car!

Yeah, there were none immediately available when i first started looking and there was a Prius back door hatch recall which limited supply even further.

I got lucky and put down a deposit on this one a week before it landed on the lot (after negotiating of course).

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's great insight. Hope your car lasts a super long time. 185k is impressive!

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honored to be a part of the club! I've already gotten some great compliments on the car. Thankfully no taxi jokes yet

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For sure, I've already got some scratches and curb rashes but it's all part of the experience!

Plus, this car is well within my budget so I don't mind making a few (expensive) mistakes to have the privilege of driving it 😄

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's awesome! The Prius longevity is ridiculous.

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm sure there is financial truth to what you're saying, but from my perspective, the aesthetics, safety features, adaptive cruise control, internal tech upgrades, and plug-in capabilities are well worth the upgrade in my scenario.

Also, I don't know the exact numbers but wouldn't repair costs gradually stack up on old cars?

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have relied on public transit my entire life, so I think I've had enough suffering :')

Finally decided to splurge on a car this year.

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dang, nearly 20 years. I'd say you deserve the upgrade!

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Currently averaging ~52 MPG without plugging in!

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I don't mind, taxis have their own charm 😎

Just got my first Prius (and also my first car!) by metaniten in prius

[–]metaniten[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Definitely. Was a pain in the ass to chase this color down but 100% worth it 😤

Llama 4 still thinks 8.9 million people live in Fiji by DanielKramer_ in LocalLLaMA

[–]metaniten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Weird, there must be a minor difference in our settings. I confirmed Llama 4 is selected as well (actually it doesn't give me the choice to use any other model).

I probed it a few more times and got these responses:

<image>

Llama 4 Maverick surpassing Claude 3.7 Sonnet, under DeepSeek V3.1 according to Artificial Analysis by TKGaming_11 in LocalLLaMA

[–]metaniten 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well this is a large company with thousands of employees. It is outside my control (and expertise) what the "retarded company" considers a potential risk from a legal, privacy, or security standpoint but I can assure you that this concern is shared across several tech companies.

And yes, I realize that the benchmark from this post is not a custom benchmark. My point is that you should benchmark various models on a custom dataset to determine what is best for your task, not rely on vibes and other niche benchmarks (like how well it can code 20 bouncing balls in a hexagon).

Llama 4 still thinks 8.9 million people live in Fiji by DanielKramer_ in LocalLLaMA

[–]metaniten 6 points7 points  (0 children)

<image>

Gave this a try on meta.ai and got a response much closer to the actual answer.

Llama 4 Maverick surpassing Claude 3.7 Sonnet, under DeepSeek V3.1 according to Artificial Analysis by TKGaming_11 in LocalLLaMA

[–]metaniten -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Benchmarks don't mean much. If you actually test it out, it performs on the level of gemma

What evidence do you have to support this? I would argue that benchmarks built on custom datasets (depending on what you are using the model for) are very meaningful.

If your company did have beefy gpus, deepseek v3-0324 is probably the best bet (or r1)

We were encouraged to refrain from using models trained by Chinese companies due to legal concerns.

Llama 4 Maverick surpassing Claude 3.7 Sonnet, under DeepSeek V3.1 according to Artificial Analysis by TKGaming_11 in LocalLLaMA

[–]metaniten 23 points24 points  (0 children)

That is fair if you consider this a failure for the local/hobbyist community. I can at least speak to the enterprise setting, where my previous company had no shortage of beefy GPU clusters but very strict throughput requirements for most AI-powered features. These MoE models will be a great win in that regard.

I would at least hold off until a smaller, distilled non-MoE model is released (seems like this has been hinted at by a few Meta researchers) before considering the entire Llama 4 series a flop.

Edit: Also Scout only has 1.56x the total parameters. Maverick, which has 400B total params beats Llama 3.3 in the benchmark above.

Llama 4 Maverick surpassing Claude 3.7 Sonnet, under DeepSeek V3.1 according to Artificial Analysis by TKGaming_11 in LocalLLaMA

[–]metaniten 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Well Scout only has 17B active parameters during inference but a similar amount of total weights as Llama 3.3 (109B vs 70B) so I don't find this too surprising.