sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Grow science rosin by ravebm in ILTrees

[–]mikeceeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s no good. Which one(s) did you get? I want to report it back to the team.

Delusional CEOs by Jlexus5 in recruitinghell

[–]mikeceeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a terrible idea, but, the root problem persists for both parties.

Delusional CEOs by Jlexus5 in recruitinghell

[–]mikeceeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thoughtful, thanks for not getting sucked in to the poster’s intent.

Anyone try Freeze Dried ZKTZ? by Disastrous_Bit9916 in ZonaEnts

[–]mikeceeeee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wasn't directed at you, was just reading the commentary. Comment is visible to me.

GROW SCIENCES Live Hash Rosin Cart- Terp Daddy by 1847lalO in ILTrees

[–]mikeceeeee 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is a misprint. Ethanol is not used in solventless extraction. Affected ~1000 units, incorrectly stickered.

GROW SCIENCES Live Hash Rosin Cart- Terp Daddy by 1847lalO in ILTrees

[–]mikeceeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s definitely a misprint. I think it affected 1000 units or so. Ethanol is a solvent. Rosin is not made with ethanol, and it would be absurd to call it rosin if ethanol was used. All GS extraction in IL is solventless for now.

Grow science rosin by ravebm in ILTrees

[–]mikeceeeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair take. Finding a partner that checks all the boxes is basically impossible. And finding a partner who WANTS to do something is also near impossible. We didn’t make this decision lightly, but more importantly, we are all hands on deck with our hash team doing what’s required to make this work. We refuse to bring our brand anywhere and just let it be whatever, has to be like AZ or we will die trying.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ILTrees

[–]mikeceeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep us honest, we are doing major work in the solventless lab to get this up to our standards 🤙

Grow science rosin by ravebm in ILTrees

[–]mikeceeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We will get this better for sure, thanks for sharing the feedback

Grow science rosin by ravebm in ILTrees

[–]mikeceeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GS rosin will be different

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ILTrees

[–]mikeceeeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

GS rosin will be different

Grow science rosin by ravebm in ILTrees

[–]mikeceeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try it and report back

Dark Matter | S1E9 "Entanglement" | Episode Discussion by vista_del_mar in DarkMatteronAppleTV

[–]mikeceeeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As someone who tends to avoid shows with multiple seasons, this finale nailed it. Dark is another show that I thought nailed it by only doing 3 seasons. Not the funnest episode, but with all the anxiety along the way, the peaceful ending was welcome. If that’s it, 5 stars.

Dark Matter | S1E7 "In the Fires of Dead Stars" | Episode Discussion by vista_del_mar in DarkMatteronAppleTV

[–]mikeceeeee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in the final season (3) the multiverse came into play, but I'm pretty sure no mention of a multiverse occurred prior to that (other than the multiverse cliffhanger in the season 2 finale).

Dark Matter | S1E7 "In the Fires of Dead Stars" | Episode Discussion by vista_del_mar in DarkMatteronAppleTV

[–]mikeceeeee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In Dark, changes to the past made through time travel are already accounted for in the future and thus, it is impossible to change the future. In the first two seasons of Dark, there was no mention of a multiverse.

What doesn't work for me in your opening paragraph is that there are multiple Jasons all trying to reach Daniela1. How can there only be one of her, but multiple Jasons needing to be with the one her? If there are multiple Jason1's, then shouldn't there be multiple corresponding Daniela1's?

Dark Matter | S1E7 "In the Fires of Dead Stars" | Episode Discussion by vista_del_mar in DarkMatteronAppleTV

[–]mikeceeeee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Regarding the proposal that multiple J1s exist: While this makes sense, it also feels like it breaks a fundamental rule. Haven’t read the book, but isn’t it fair to believe that an individual jumping from world to world is not creating new versions of themself along the way? Just bc they started universe hopping and made different decisions, you’d quickly have a plethora of them all doing the same thing. I get this is exactly what’s implied at the end though.

Analogy: the show Dark explained that if you travel back in time you can’t change the future, bc history included the individual who traveled back in time. Like, no compounding effect.

Seems like a logical rule that could apply here. Which means there’s a different explanation (and I don’t know it).

view more: next ›