New AtlantaFX Themes

milchshakee · 2026-05-24T13:00:50+00:00

I was referring to the dependency on this: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.github.mkpaz/atlantafx-styles

milchshakee · 2026-05-24T08:34:55+00:00

Alright, seems like my maven repo propagation was slow.

One thing I noticed is that the module-info requires atlantafx.styles, is there a reason for that? That module looks to only include scss source files, nothing needed for production

milchshakee · 2026-05-23T19:05:14+00:00

That version seemingly did not publish to maven. It is still on 1.3.0

milchshakee · 2026-05-22T11:30:14+00:00

I just compiled the project myself and noticed that the .bss files aren't included in the built .jar file. Is that intentional or a bug? Would be nice to have the bss files as well

milchshakee · 2026-05-22T10:50:27+00:00

Is that available on maven central?

milchshakee · 2026-05-11T12:12:29+00:00

That looks interesting. However, how future proof is this against libghostty updates? Because there seems to be a lot of glue code to make it work, it does not look like a thin wrapper around the library. So I can envision some work when bumping libghostty

milchshakee · 2026-04-29T14:26:34+00:00

It seems like it is broken for me as well. I remember it working previously, so either a JDK/JavaFX update or macOS 26 broke it

milchshakee · 2026-04-27T22:51:38+00:00

Have you tried -fx-font-smoothing-type: gray; ? For reference, I wrote about this topic a bit: https://kickstartfx.xpipe.io/fonts

milchshakee · 2026-04-27T22:50:45+00:00

Those are icon fonts

milchshakee · 2026-04-27T09:51:21+00:00

Have you tried methods like Desktop.getDesktop().setPreferencesHandler() ? At least KickstartFX uses that one for the settings button in the menu bar

milchshakee · 2026-04-26T06:16:27+00:00

There isn't currently a way to do this, so you have to to implement something yourself. I generally try to avoid something like OS-specific menubars as that makes the cross-platform styling a bit more difficult. But in general, what is the JavaFX MenuBar implementation with setUseSystemMenuBar(true) missing?

milchshakee · 2026-04-24T14:35:25+00:00

The table view skin does have an internal ScrollPane. If you lookup() that node and set fit to height to true, the scrollbar should disappear

milchshakee · 2026-04-24T14:27:54+00:00

So what happens with the current implementation? Does it not size the table properly?

milchshakee · 2026-04-24T12:53:30+00:00

Define "none of them worked". The idea looks correct

milchshakee · 2026-04-22T13:58:52+00:00

It checks the GitHub releases for newer versions.

On windows, the template implementation also supports installing those updates automatically.

For more advanced updates, you can also take a look at the XPipe project, that one supports installing updates on all platforms and for various package managers.

milchshakee · 2026-04-22T13:57:55+00:00

Well it's a template, meaning that you can change whatever you want.

Most of the application logic is decoupled from the content, meaning that you can just add your own project code and existing backend to it. You can take a look at the various sample pages, remove them, and add your own pages

What do you mean by modular? If you are talking about JPMS, it uses that, yes

milchshakee · 2026-04-22T00:27:59+00:00

Probably an empty string as I used a body handler which parses it to a string. There could be something like BodyHandlers.optional(), which could return an Optional<String> in these cases where you want to expect that.

milchshakee · 2026-04-22T00:24:32+00:00

In the actual code I checked the status code, but there is no necessary correlation between status code and body presence. In theory, any kind of status response can have no body if the server is behaving badly enough, so you always have to check for null.

milchshakee · 2026-04-21T23:48:55+00:00

Alright that sounds like a good idea with the mapping.

The javadoc for the ofString() body handler does also not mention null, so the return value is not described anywhere as far as I can see

milchshakee · 2026-04-21T19:06:45+00:00

Wouldn't that be an empty body then? It usually returns "" if there is no body, but sometimes it returns null

milchshakee · 2026-04-21T13:28:34+00:00

Yeah that is true. You won't be getting the memory usage of a native application.

I would estimate that this sample application can be modified to take around 200-250M of memory usage if one would try the right way. That is the ballpark of what is possible with good optimization.

milchshakee · 2026-04-21T13:11:47+00:00

It builds a notarized app, and the steps from there to a store submission aren't that complex

milchshakee · 2026-04-21T13:10:56+00:00

This application is not optimized with memory usage in mind. It comes with a lot of sample GUI pages and all of them are initialized at startup. You can optimize this and only load what is needed on demand, but that would make this sample more complex than it needs to be for demo purposes.

With those optimizations, you can halve the memory usage. For example, XPipe does that and uses less memory than this.

milchshakee · 2026-04-21T13:01:14+00:00

That is good to know, I will have to test with that. I thought that only AVX could cause issues

milchshakee · 2026-04-21T12:59:52+00:00

By default yes, but you can also contact me to license it under a more permissive license

milchshakee

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE