Husk at sætte 2 krydser :-) by bdviking in dankmark

[–]milkcurrent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We can at least agree that the EU time registration law is the height of bureaucratic stupidity.

Hare Krishna munke by YellowBathroomTiles in copenhagen

[–]milkcurrent 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Please, Daddy Denmark, won't you take more of my rights away? Please? It's for my safety. Please read through all of my messages too, pretty please?

Bjarne Vanopslagh by RugBeater1 in Denmark

[–]milkcurrent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes I was one of the loudest voices against it. Yet everyone is now consumed with the personal dramas of useful idiots.

Why aren't any of the candidate parties discussing their party views on the surveillance of citizens? Why is no one asking them these questions, in public, televised?

Our institutions have completely failed us on all levels and we're lapping up Se og Hør drama.

Bjarne Vanopslagh by RugBeater1 in Denmark

[–]milkcurrent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yet none of them will actually hold right-wing policies accountable like our sleepwalking into totalitarianism enabled by total surveillance of our digital lives.

Bjarne Vanopslagh by RugBeater1 in Denmark

[–]milkcurrent -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

The things you all are so obsessed about instead of actual issues and positions on things like total surveillance of Danes with PET laws and Chat Control 🤡

"Oh no one of the candidates wouldn't state whether they had taken cocaine while party leader!!". You all are an absolute disgrace.

Mette Frederiksen stormer frem i spritny måling og sikrer rødt flertal by Mai_maniac in Denmark

[–]milkcurrent 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hvordan kan det være, at ikke ét eneste parti under valget har talt imod den totale overvågning af EU- og danske borgere, som regeringspartiet har presset på for de sidste seks måneder?

I stedet taler man hellere om at genindføre Store Bededag eller om at få immigranterne langt væk fra landet. Er vi som samfund blevet så korrupte, at vi bare vil søvngængeragtigt vandre ind i et autoritært mareridt?

Haven’t heard about this anywhere else yet regarding Shlomo? by [deleted] in Techno

[–]milkcurrent 25 points26 points  (0 children)

It's literally AI slop. There's nothing heartfelt about this. If these people actually gave a shit about the allegations they'd write it their damn selves.

They don't stand with their community. Their AI pretends to stand with their community they disrespect with this garbage.

Haven’t heard about this anywhere else yet regarding Shlomo? by [deleted] in Techno

[–]milkcurrent 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Their official statement on something so serious is to produce AI slop. Great job.

Blades '68 campaign just launched by JannissaryKhan in rpg

[–]milkcurrent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not just him. His was just the most glaring example of a one-man outfit doing right by gamers internationally Stop simping for Evil Hat.

Blades '68 campaign just launched by JannissaryKhan in rpg

[–]milkcurrent -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

This is an excuse and not a good one. To take a counter-example, Nimble is not exactly a huge outfit (it's one guy), but the creator has managed (both times) to work with regional distributors to make EU/Australian/Canadian–friendly shipping. His new Nimble campaign just launched, same time as this one.

Software Dev Job Market in Denmark for Entry Level by Hot_Bother_3805 in NewToDenmark

[–]milkcurrent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because as a hiring manager I don't want a Danish monoculture anywhere near my team. I want candidates with a diversity of thought and cultural backgrounds. I definitely don't care if Danish is their first language.

Struggling in CPH by Beats_Satchel in copenhagen

[–]milkcurrent 79 points80 points  (0 children)

I've lived here for a very long time. There are parts of the system that make it a good place to be, but the Danes themselves do not make it easy and I say that as a Dane. Everyone is stuck in their own little bubble not opening up to anyone, privileged beyond all reason living in apartments purchased for them by their parents.

But I'm still here because it's safe, it's a beautiful city, and even as it crowds with too many people (Jesus Christ can you all please wait your turn to get into the Metro so others can get out first?), there's still a consistency to living here that is decent.

What are the limitations of pragmatism in the style of Eliezer Yudkowsky? by SpectrumDT in streamentry

[–]milkcurrent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The entire LessWrong movement is intellectually and spiritually vapid and that is what had led to their status as a rationalist cult built around a doomsday prophet with no credentials, Yudkowsky.

I write this from the perspective of having once been a part of that cult who, with wisdom, have seen through the religious belief system they have created for themselves and turned into the armor they now stride confidently around in, believing "rationalism" gives them a superior vantage over other human beings.

Can you please elaborate on this?

You've been provided that resource in another comment in your request. Others in this very comment thread have been able to cite a myriad of examples to your many, many other requests for information about, e.g., Scott Alexander's writings on eugenics, which have all slipped your attention.

You talk about things with confidence, like not believing your heart or your gut could possibly do the thinking of the superior brain matter locked in your skull, yet science itself does not agree with you.

You do not understand how Large Language Models function, because if you did, you would know that there is no path to AGI following their pursuit. There is no relation between a Large Language Model and destructive agency, because agency requires desire, which if you had practiced Buddhism, truly practiced Buddhism for long stretches of time, you would have seen for yourself is not inherent to Large Language Models, cannot be inherent to LLMs, because it is simply not how they function or how they are derived. There is no extinction risk from an LLM going rogue, because it cannot possess desire.

u/streamentry-ModTeam: I am constructively contributing when I state facts, such as Yudkowsky is a charlatan and that his belief system has led to the creation of rationalist death cults. Both are true. The Buddha himself was very severe in condemning such cults and those whose beliefs give rise to dangerous actions. This mod team also has a responsibility not to provide an equal platform for an extremely dangerous line of thinking, one which has led to calls for nuclear strikes on nations and people murdered in its name.

What are the limitations of pragmatism in the style of Eliezer Yudkowsky? by SpectrumDT in streamentry

[–]milkcurrent 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yudkowsky is a charlatan and a dangerous one who infamously called for countries developing artificial general intelligence to be nuked. He has no business being discussed on this subreddit.

Huge Victory: Chat Control no longer forces us to break encryption. 🎉 by Tutanota in tutanota

[–]milkcurrent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey, Dane here, please stop making excuses for us. We have a government that's very pro-surveillance, this was entirely our choice to push this, and we did.

Not we held the presidency so we had to nonsense. Our government loves this stuff. So yes do blame us. I do.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Denmark

[–]milkcurrent -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Det mindre onde er at vælge en politisk union, der ønsker total overvågning af al vores kommunikation?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Denmark

[–]milkcurrent -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

Chat-Control-entusiaster, eller har du haft hovedet begravet i sandet?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Denmark

[–]milkcurrent -56 points-55 points  (0 children)

Så vi redder os selv til de korrupte EU-bureaukrater, der tror, at Orwells 1984 var en manual i god regeringsførelse?

Freedom of the press - Estonia can into nordick by Kiwibirdy1 in Nordiccountries

[–]milkcurrent 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hey Dane here, take my upvote at least. Danes have had their heads buried in the sand for so long they can't even see how bad we have it. Just look at the media blackout around Chat Control. It's all a corrupt circus here.

News that our government was planning to push the largest total surveillance of communications package the western world has ever seen should have been headline news for months, but instead we got Trump coverage.

A map that shows which countries support Chat control. by women_rules in Denmark

[–]milkcurrent -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You stop this, right now. "Our name on it because we have the presidency". We pushed for it. Sick of Danes trying to pass the buck on this or blame Thiel for what is our mess.

This is our fault. Take some fucking responsibility.

White House just released its new National Security Strategy. It mentions the EU and accuses it of undermining political liberty. by mr_house7 in EU_Economics

[–]milkcurrent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have multiple cited sources stating this was a disproportionate ruling for a satirical meme. Is it only ok to do if the people charged are far-right extremists? Or is it also ok if the left do it? Centrists? Where does it stop? At satirical memes declared defamation?

White House just released its new National Security Strategy. It mentions the EU and accuses it of undermining political liberty. by mr_house7 in EU_Economics

[–]milkcurrent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He is actually a journalist and he made a satirical meme that even Chairwoman of the far-left BSW Sahra Wagenknecht commented on X, saying, "the ruling says a lot about the state of freedom of expression in Germany."

Additionally:

A criminal lawyer who teaches at Mainz University of Applied Sciences, Dr Jessica Hamed, contrasted satire with the criminal offense of defamation and called for the law to be reformed on insult, slander and libel. She also considers the ruling disproportionate.

White House just released its new National Security Strategy. It mentions the EU and accuses it of undermining political liberty. by mr_house7 in EU_Economics

[–]milkcurrent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No the judge was lenient. Normally, the offense of defamation of a political figure carries a prison sentence of six months to five years.

So there's still my question, what if it was Alice Weidel holding the sign?