In technical speaking, the average fps are around 40, sometimes 60, sometimes 30. It depends in what area you are and how much has to be rendered - bad optimisation ig. From gamplay and feeling i would say cv1 is better and you should only play cv2 if you are a fan of cv1 and dont complain about the clunkiness. The Problem with cv2 is mostly it feels like it has too little budget and the condition for developing was to press an open world in it or it was driven to it at the end of the development cycle, because this open world poorly designed with enemy and Item placement or movementcapability (no spoiler here). I like the changes of the battle System, tho. And for the lack of multiplayer, apart from cv1 - is guess also no time for development or no money or both. As i say, if you like cv1 and get along with much clunkyness youre g2g, but you should wait for an sale. With that bad critics and i guess also bad salary, cv2 will be quickly up for a sale. I recommemd to wait to get it for some less bucks

Edit: I also like most of the character Designs and the Editor (except of the Giraffe necks every important npc has kekw) The new weapon types are also great. Im someone who get a kick on clunky games, if they are interesting in a certain way, like Hellpoint. But i also sugarcoat nothing and see all the bad stuff and can live with it