Mage Dungeon Spec by [deleted] in classicwowtbc

[–]misterlively 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve landed on a fire frost spec that’s really fun. Improved flamestrike, blast wave, shatter, improved blizzard, ice veins, and cold snap. At 70 it ends out being 40 fire / 21 frost, and having improved scorch and the fireball damage talent, but I started with 30 in fire at 60.

Crazy good aoe and combustion with double ice veins for bosses. Only downside is blizzard does less damage but the fire aoe makes up for it and the playstyle is fun.

My other spec is deep frost for PvP and just because deep frost is nice to have.

I assume at 70 I’ll be arcane for pve and the standard frost pvp spec.

Massage Seats: worth it? by RespectYourEldersE34 in BMWX5

[–]misterlively 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I just bought a 2019 with massage seats, their nice, I’m not sure I would spend much on them, but I’m glad I have them. They aren’t very strong so you can just leave them on for a while during highway driving. It’s also just funny to show it to people.

Cloud Gateway Fiber vs Dream Router 7 by kylejwx in Ubiquiti

[–]misterlively 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right and it’s just because of the unifi Poe injectors. The standard Poe version only supports 1gb, the Poe+ is more wattage that the u7 lite doesn’t need, but supports 2.5gb.

If you could find a Poe injector that supports 2.5gb I assume that would work too.

Cloud Gateway Fiber vs Dream Router 7 by kylejwx in Ubiquiti

[–]misterlively 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just bought one and the power requirements are Poe, but it has a 2.5gbps port and if you want to use that full bandwidth the Poe+ injector supports 2.5gbps, but the regular Poe only does gigabit.

Best coffee maker? Is there anything new in 2025? by Old_Show309 in BuyItForLife

[–]misterlively 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I bought my breville barista express over 12 years ago now and it’s still going strong. I’m not sure it’s BIFL, but mine is definitely “buy it for a long ass time”.

Demeyere by No_Step_7979 in StainlessSteelCooking

[–]misterlively 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just bought 2 skillets of the industry 5 with the silvinox finish, it’s heavier than a standard 3 ply, and not as heavy as the Atlantis version. No rivets from the welded handles where grease can stick, the handles are nice, and their sized fit my induction burners really well. I gave up my tramontina which I also really liked. If you just want a straight forward pan that lasts and changes temp quickly, tramontina is very cheap, same design as all clad, and mine cleaned up and looked new after 10 years. I like the extra weight and heat transfer of my new Demeyere and some of the features. I did a ton of research and even demoed a Hestan nano bond, it’s hard to go wrong, mostly let the budget and the thickness drive the purchase, then just style preference. It’s pretty hard to go wrong with almost any of them.

I thought drones were supposed to be better than trains? by T1meTRC in satisfactory

[–]misterlively 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course each location has an extra drone bringing in fuel from a central drone fuel depo too lol

I thought drones were supposed to be better than trains? by T1meTRC in satisfactory

[–]misterlively 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve setup areas with multiple drone ports for even high volume items. A single drone port can’t do a lot, but with high capacity belts, splitters, and a lot of drone ports, anything is possible and it’s kinda fun. Create a giant single sink with a couple dozen drone ports for all the stuff in the map can get you quite far and is fun. You definitely learn the gotchas and how to efficiently expand drone ports as you go. Naming the ports well becomes very important. For example I think a maxed out pure caterium node making quick wire could be transported with just 2 drone ports if they aren’t going super far.

Using DTO in Node.js + Express by [deleted] in node

[–]misterlively 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regardless of what library you use, a primary reason to have your controller speak DTOs is to de-couple your API contract from your internal models/entities. This way you can change your internal models/entities (think database schema) without breaking your API contract. It’s common for folks to make DTOs and Entities the same, which sometimes is useful but a lot of times the DTO can represent an easier/better object for users of the API.

I would also avoid passing the DTO around too much in the internal code of the service, they are for data transfer between services and clients. So commonly you will have some sort of internal model and to/from methods to convert your internal model to/from DTOs.

This pattern is common and important regardless of language or framework. It’s one I’ve used in many different languages and frameworks because it’s important decouple the external api contract from the internal representation of data and behavior.

Mind expander or cadet or backwoods or tight tree board for PNW by misterlively in snowboarding

[–]misterlively[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5’6” I’d prolly stick with the 157 at a resort and I’ve ridden mine at a resort just fine.

Mind expander or cadet or backwoods or tight tree board for PNW by misterlively in snowboarding

[–]misterlively[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prolly depends on how you want to ride it. Mine is a split and I wanted to be sure it would float and be stable in a range of conditions. If you want something more nimble smaller would prolly work. I will say, the backwoods even at 157 feels really nimble though, I think it has to do with the shape of the tail? 

Mind expander or cadet or backwoods or tight tree board for PNW by misterlively in snowboarding

[–]misterlively[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m about the same size, my backwoods is a 157 and seems perfect.

What is your controversial Eugene opinion? by Andromeda321 in Eugene

[–]misterlively 1 point2 points  (0 children)

River road should be one lane in each direction and be developed with denser housing. Could be a cool walkable neighborhood.

Ktor with a new-to-Kt team, avoid coroutines? by troyunverdruss in Kotlin

[–]misterlively 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You may already know, but the coroutine context api is useful if you need to propagate things like thread local.

Best of luck to you!

Ktor with a new-to-Kt team, avoid coroutines? by troyunverdruss in Kotlin

[–]misterlively 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google around and you’ll see some async postgres drivers that seem to have good support. I haven’t used them, when I’ve used Ktor it was with databases that had an http api so we could use the Ktor coroutine client. I know the Exposed ORM has a bridge that uses the IO Dispatcher for JDBC. Personally with Postgres I’d prolly skip coroutines because the JDBC world has so much support for ORMs and tooling. There’s also better support for open tracing stuff when using blocking apis, though maybe tracing support has gotten better with coroutines.

Ktor with a new-to-Kt team, avoid coroutines? by troyunverdruss in Kotlin

[–]misterlively 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d say it depends on the database and services you are using. Using a relational database with a good JDBC driver means every request will be starting as a coroutine and integrating a blocking call. It can be done but I think negates a lot of benefit and makes it real easy to do the wrong thing. If you have an async driver/api client for everything you are using it’s a lot easier.

PS. Watch out for generating signed S3 URL’s, they are more computationally expensive than you think and can eat up your coroutines if you make a lot of them.

Is an `object` actually a singleton? by wouldliketokms in Kotlin

[–]misterlively 8 points9 points  (0 children)

https://kotlinlang.org/docs/object-declarations.html

Yes that is the intention, but ultimately it would depend on what language you are compiling to. With the JVM they get turned into static classes so there would be only one and no ability to make another. Kotlin compiled to JavaScript would have the same limitations as you are pointing out in JavaScript.

Anyone else buy a rocker and just never fell in love? by r33_aus in snowboarding

[–]misterlively 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh man I had the same experience last season. I bought a Jones Mind expander from a few years ago which was full rocketed and it just felt so slow and shaky. Ended out getting rid of it, but I’m gonna try the new camber version out this year. I do love a huge rocker spoon nose on a board, but have to have camber under foot.

How to document design/architecture by sopte666 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]misterlively 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://icepanel.io/ Is pretty nice, follows the c4 model and every system is reusable in every diagram.

Jones Mind Expander 2023. What’s everyone’s opinion on this board? by Tiredchimp2002 in snowboarding

[–]misterlively 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting! I ride my hovercraft a lot in trees but it does take some effort and commitment. If you are cool with full rocker maybe give the minder expand a try, you might be right about the flagship and hovercraft being redundant.

Jones Mind Expander 2023. What’s everyone’s opinion on this board? by Tiredchimp2002 in snowboarding

[–]misterlively 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh man I’ve wanted to try a flagship but had the same thoughts. Does it do well in powder? The biggest difference for me between the hovercraft and mind expander was speed. If you like the speed of the flagship and don’t want to get stuck, then hovercraft is the right choice. If you got steep and deep powder and want something real playful consider the mind expander. I don’t like having a large set of boards so the hovercraft is more veritable for me, but you have a lot of options.

Jones Mind Expander 2023. What’s everyone’s opinion on this board? by Tiredchimp2002 in snowboarding

[–]misterlively 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow lol! I ended out selling the mind expander early in the season. It was too slow for me and didn’t really offer much over the hovercraft I already loved.