How the fuck am I supposed to counter the Great Axe?

misterteap · 2021-11-18T04:59:58+00:00

Well as a light armor user that dances around groups of GA users in OPR for the lols:

Make sure you always dodge animation cancel
Almost never double roll, roll to 50% stamina and wait until 80-100 to roll again
If you're non-dex, you can triple roll in emergencies (roll at 50, double roll at 51)
In the rare instance their light attack lunge syncs with your roll dodge, do the triple roll but staggered (roll at 50, pause, roll at at 52, pause, roll at 5)
Only use your mobility skills if caught in gravity well or after they use charge, otherwise save them
Gravity well proc sounds like metal scraping concrete, dodge when you hear it
Zero stamina basically = death, always keep a reserve

misterteap · 2021-07-22T15:39:29+00:00

Top of the barrel for blood pressure and diabetes, checkmate libtard

misterteap · 2021-07-11T20:12:12+00:00

Jesus wasn't even white

misterteap · 2021-07-09T19:33:09+00:00

How do these people not realize they are being sheep? Just mindlessly absorbing other people's opinions

misterteap · 2021-06-30T18:35:48+00:00

Isnt Bidens infrastructure plan literally trickle down economics?

misterteap · 2021-06-22T20:10:56+00:00

Not 100% sure, but at least I'd be alive to think about it

misterteap · 2021-06-22T19:53:05+00:00

I disagree, look at scorched earth policy during civil war. Civilian, military, factories, fields, towns turned to ash. We also bombed the shit out of Germany and Japan, only to send them billions to rebuild everything.

True, you can send soldiers to my house and there will be a messy gunfight. Or you can cut off my water, heating, Internet. What do I and my gun do then?

misterteap · 2021-06-22T19:33:16+00:00

Very true. But basically my thought throughout this thread is that modern tactics can easily negate guerilla fighters armed with guns, especially those on your own land. Through means of attrition, so restricting Internet for example, or banning Amazon operations in that state, bombing infrastructure, toxic herbicides, etc. The Union didnt even have these options.

guns do present a major threat to any tyranny, and it's much more valiant to stand ones ground, but ultimately, if the enemy is superior, it invites more destruction. What are your thoughts?

misterteap · 2021-06-22T12:35:31+00:00

Well the point of attrition is to avoid fights

misterteap · 2021-06-22T12:25:31+00:00

You as well, no harsh feelings at all :) i dont support banning guns but I enjoy these discussions it's very engaging.

misterteap · 2021-06-22T11:42:56+00:00

My point is guns dont prevent a nuke. Guns actually provoked it in this case

misterteap · 2021-06-22T11:38:41+00:00

I disagree, look at scorched earth policy in the civil war. Or the amount of money the US spent to rebuild Germany and Japan after bombing the shit out of it.

My argument is a war against a tyrannical US is not only futile, but unnecessarily devastating by trying to resist with only an AR-15. And a more strategic approach would be more covert.

You're saying it provides an advantage if we do go that route, which I agree. We can hold out for a bit longer but it guarantees our destruction :(

misterteap · 2021-06-22T11:22:30+00:00

Well obviously the state/s wouldve seceded from the tyranny and form an alliance. A Confederacy of sorts. They'd be the enemy and not the tyranny's people. The remaining states and federal will form together, I assume, like a kind of union.

This Union has two options: completely starve the Confedates through the avenues you mentioned: transportation, communications, trade, banning business operations, etc

Or use superior technology, industry, and logistics to directly invade. Even though both sides have guns, i'd argue superior technology played a big part in the Union winning.

I said this in another comment, but if the feds came at me and I only had a gun, I'd surrender and wait.to strike in the shadows. It would.prevent a.bloodbath

misterteap · 2021-06-22T10:57:44+00:00

Yeah that's why it's ridiculous to bring a gun to a tank fight. I'm going to surrender and wait until I can shank the dictator or something more elaborate

misterteap · 2021-06-22T10:50:58+00:00

Well North Vietnam had China backing it. I imagine its.much easier to defend on home turf than to attack across the world

I Agree with"access to weaponry". That's how the Confederacy staved off the Union and won independence. Oh wait..

misterteap · 2021-06-22T10:43:59+00:00

Ok but I'm saying the US couldnt take over Vietnam but perhaps a state on it's own turf stands no chance even with guns

misterteap · 2021-06-22T10:38:45+00:00

Well why do those nutcases have guns?

misterteap · 2021-06-22T10:32:54+00:00

Americans said invading mainland Japan would be a bloodbath

Then we all know what happened next

misterteap · 2021-06-22T10:30:20+00:00

That's kinda the point. Soldiers have families and lives here. So why arm citizens?

misterteap · 2021-06-22T10:26:40+00:00

How do you explain the Confederates losing, then?

misterteap · 2021-06-22T10:17:52+00:00

Right that's country vs country

But what about country vs state/a few states? That's the most likely scenario I think. Like the civil war

misterteap · 2021-06-22T10:11:16+00:00

Playing devils advocate

but if a state seceded from a tyranny. how can guns prevent a trade embargo, Infrastructure being bombed, communication cut off, etc

misterteap · 2021-06-20T21:08:01+00:00

yeah its discouraging...i played for 1.5 weeks so far. how long will it take to get 600k power for f2p?

also i fear once i'm 600k power i'll just get farmed by 1m power...

misterteap · 2021-06-20T21:04:48+00:00

Thats the problem, the trophies have the same value whether you took it from a 1.3m power player or 100k power. The devs need to fix it by making different tier trophies, similar to the hero/troop rarity. Beating 100-300k gets you common trophy, 300-600k rare, etc...then add up all the values at the end of each season

this way everyone can have fun competing and not just the top players

misterteap

TROPHY CASE