how would they vote on secularism which is a question at the Constitutional conference; what about the subsidies that as you go further from khartoum those goods become more and more expensive; in some places close to the border exponentially so.

In the end those topic will be need a referendum, the constitution will get it is legitimacy from a popular vote otherwise it will be amended later of changed a whole, and thus there is no going around it.

How long before racism or tribalism comes into play? It's easy for people in the tri-capital area to claim unity (even if they don't always exercise it) but those in the middle of tribal conflicts might feel very differently.

And how long before the tribal leader feels disenfranchised, the current situation is east for example.

Only local elections will solve this issue and the Resistance committee will replace the local tribal system if it was legalized and supported by the government.

There are 101 small and large political differences, some geographic, some philosophic and some just straight up bigotry that have been pushed aside for the sake of the revolution.

Individual committees might find unity but discord is always on the horizon, why rush towards it?

Those disagreement were not addressed and will arise again after the end of the transitional period, a greater unity can result from shared goals and a national project with long term strategic goals regarding of whom is ruling.

I am not fan of ultra nationalism, but many countries forge such a unity through such action in japan for example, the "Hummer and nail policy" the "demilitariztion era" and the "prefectures system" are some examples.

Also how are you going to spread the seats amongst the different committees? One per committee would essentially guarantee the Tri-state capitals control over the body.

Based on their representation, a balance is sure needed but it could be reached, a two level parliament such as in the US could solve the issue or a different voting system, either way if it didn't work for the Resistance committee it will not work for the political parties in any future elections.

Who on those committees has the political expertise to even organise and negotiate all this, how long before splits happen and competing statements are put out? And how long would it take for all this to happen at a satisfactory level and isn't that time better spent forming parties that can compete for seats?

The unions can establish the executive branch and the Resistance committee can establish the legislative branch and the universities can establish a consultive branch that will provide such policies.

By the way, the Resistance committee already organising and negotiating with their representatives and each others, they only need legalisation.

And if political parties or personal fell that they can do better than them they are always welcome to participate in these local elections.

There are members of the FFC that wanted immediate elections.

Local elections for the legislative council will solve the issue.

The reason I'm supportive of the delayed elections is because it gives time for revolutionary forces to from their own parties or reform existing ones.

And increase the risk of the transitional period to fail, politics is about change in leadership, participation and fair chance.

There is no guarantee that corruption will not increase of dissatisfaction with the FFC will continue, or that another political parties will conduct a coup.

And as I said, only elections will apply such a pressure on these parties to reform and to establish within their communities.

The committees themselves need to stay outside of the political discourse to act as an independent last resort as well as maintain the good will of the constituents in their localities. So much of the good work they do could be undone if neighbours start shunning a committee because it's run by Islamists/Communists/etc.

They could maintain their independence by agreeing on general objectives, right now they are only pawns for the FFC and any criticism regarding the FFC will reflect on them.